Peter Toth

6.1K posts

Peter Toth banner
Peter Toth

Peter Toth

@compulog

Extraterrestrial Power. On the Moon and other planetary bodies

Australia Katılım Mart 2007
1.4K Takip Edilen427 Takipçiler
Peter Toth
Peter Toth@compulog·
As usual don't bet against @CJHandmer. When he talks, shut up and listen. Worst case you'll learn new things, best case he'll change your world view, for the better.
Casey Handmer@CJHandmer

Some thoughts on destruction of oil and gas infrastructure in the Gulf. It is not exactly a new insight that modern economies operate on oil. Oil access, synthesis, and interdiction was a major theater of WW2. 100 years ago oil-poor nations spent heavily and participated in terrible wars over oil. See, for example, the Combined Bombing Offensive, Operation Tidal Wave, and the destruction of the Leuna synthetic fuel plants, not to mention the effectiveness of the submarine war in the waters around Japan. In 2022, energy producer Russia invaded Ukraine, instantly throwing into stark relief the idiocy of European energy policy, where an unholy alliance of heavily regulated energy contractors and astroturfed "green" activists managed to get Germany to shut down their nuclear industry. Even as solar panel production, largely initially developed and funded in the West, grew to overwhelming proportions, Europe insisted on sending roughly $1b *per day* to Russia for access to their oil and gas. If Europe had adjusted course in early 2022, then they would be able to support their power grids and probably some synthetic fuel production by now. The US built nuclear weapons from scratch in 2.5 years in the 1940s in competition with other national priorities at the same time. It's been more than four years since Ukraine's invasion. But no, they did sweet fuck all about ensuring energy sovereignty. Indeed, they even went in the other direction. Britain concentrated government resources on cracking down on free speech and stopped drilling for oil. The continent continued their ill-informed blanket ban on fracking, and working age people continued to pay the price, in the form of ever higher costs, ever higher taxes, ever poorer public services, ever dropping fertility. What about the rest of the oil importing developed world? France and Japan maintained their nuclear industry, their navies, their shipping industries and the fungibility of their supply - to an extent - even as they continued to actively burn up their economies in other more insidious ways. New Zealand shut down their last refinery. Australia exports a lot of crude and gas but mostly lacks the ability to close their supply chain in their own borders, and fuel prices have almost doubled. California continued to ban new drilling and continues to wage open regulatory warfare against their oil refineries, perversely increasing oil-related air pollution in the state from foreign oil tanker imports and pushing gasoline prices ever higher. More of the world has attempted to switch to natural gas supply, with investments exceeding $1t on gas import and export terminals, as though it's some fundamental law of nature that hydrocarbons must cross an ocean before they're used. As though the US fracking boom will last forever, or Asian demand growth won't see European prices continue to increase, further crushing their economic dynamism. I have been in the room with various Asian and European energy ministers and have asked them point blank: What's your plan? I have never gotten a better answer than a shrug, as though they'll muddle through and soon it'll be someone else's problem. The best time to get serious about domestic energy supply chains was four years ago. The second best time is today. The pain will ease just as soon as you say the magic words: I must increase my own energy supply! And yes, it is totally possible to produce synthetic oil and gas pretty much anywhere that people live with a solar-based process we've spent four years developing at @TerraformIndies, it is future proof, it is strategically robust, it is price-linked to solar manufacturing cost, which continues to fall like a rock. It's not entirely trivial to do but, given that Europe spends about 100,000x more on Russian oil and gas imports than they do on (privately funded) synthetic fuel development, I am on safe ground when I accuse Europe's leaders of committing gross capital misallocation. Imagine what the synthetic fuel industry could achieve with $1b/day! If you are an energy minister, now is a good time to reflect on fates worse than losing an election. Get back to work!

English
0
0
2
8
Talan Baker 
Talan Baker @Talanbaker787·
@compulog @SawyerMerritt I think they’re the normal 18” Aperture covers that have been available since day one. Don’t quote me on that though. 😅
English
1
0
0
1
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
Tesla showed up to a community event in my area tonight. They shuttled ~200 people on FSD (Supervised) to and from the parking lot in this Model Y over the course of 6 hours. I’m pretty sure this was the first time most of these people experienced FSD.
Sawyer Merritt tweet media
English
90
227
3.1K
99.5K
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
BREAKING: The larger Model Y L is now officially available to order in Australia and New Zealand. Deliveries start May 2026. Starting price: • Premium AWD : $74,900 AUD ($53,000 USD) Couple unique options: • Cosmic silver paint: $2,600 AUD ($1,800 USD) • Zen Grey Interior: $1,500 AUD ($1,000 USD) Order: #overview" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tesla.com/en_au/modely/d…
Sawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet media
English
97
139
1.7K
124K
Peter Toth
Peter Toth@compulog·
@Tslachan Don't forget 681km range. Performance seats with thigh extensions. V2L. And can still order with full FSD
English
0
0
0
6
Peter Toth
Peter Toth@compulog·
The question is also what Australia can learn from this. 1. Self suffiency is key for national sovereignity. 2. Install way more solar and batteries. 3. Way more EVs. 4. Refine our own hydrocarbons. 5. Increase complexity of economy. Even the notion of "letting Australia run out of fuel" implies a victim mentality.
Rick@Rickaus75

Just in case you don’t know: If you want to see a global crisis, let Australia run out of fuel… Did you know that Australia is the 22nd largest exporter on earth. 15th largest country by measure of GDP. As far as minerals go, we are the 3rd largest exporter of minerals on earth but per capita, we are by far the largest. We are the 3rd largest overall energy exporter on the planet, largest of the OECD countries. We are the Largest exporter of iron ore #1 $87,700,000,000 87.7 billion dollars or 55.9% of the global total. Largest lithium producer #1 61,000 tons 46.9% of global supply. Largest exporter of zinc #1 $2,2100,000,000 2.21 billion dollars Largest exporter for barley #1 $2,370,000,000 2.37 billion dollars Largest exporter for Bauxite #1 110 million tonnes Largest exporters of Liquid Natural Gas #1 in volume #3 in revenue. $27,400,000,000 27.4 billion dollars Largest wheat exporter #1 $10,200,000,000 Largest exporter of sheep #1 49% of global supply $1,500,000,000 Largest exporter of opals #1 90% of global supply. Largest exporter of manganese #1 $1,390,000,000 2nd Largest beef exporter after Brazil. 12 billion dollars. $12,200,000,000 2nd Largest gold exporter #2 310 tons annually 34.2 billion dollars 3rd Largest grain exporter #3 14% of global supply. Large exporter of copper #3 $64,200,000,000 - 7.1% 2nd largest exporter of uranium. #2 4.1 billion tonnes We have 30% of the known global uranium reserves. 5th Largest exporter of silver #5 Number 8 exporter of aluminium #8 $4.1 billion dollars 4.5% of global supply 26th Largest exporter of oil #26 $7,540,000,000 $7.54 billion dollars Australia is the 4th Largest coal producer of coal on earth. We are the Largest coal exporter on earth. 50% of worlds sea born coal comes from Australia. 150 million coming from the mighty Hunter which is the largest single coal export port on earth. It is completely irresponsible to allow a country that feeds and powers the world to get into a situation where we may need to pull up trucks because we have a fuel shortage… And you still have to work and get only 50% of your earnings? You kidding me! Where’s the money?

English
0
0
0
26
Peter Toth
Peter Toth@compulog·
@aelluswamy Wen new fsd version in Australia. Took it on a long drive in Australia and was underwhelming. It recognises 100 sign but keeps going at 80. Many times. Almost got rear ended by a truck because it braked too hard when reading a sign incorrectly.
English
0
1
0
56
Peter Toth
Peter Toth@compulog·
@Gwanatu what is your current recommendation for a phone with the following 3 requirements: 1) screen for PWM sensitive 2) non Chinese software 3) flagship or best phone as much as possible. Sad that @ASUS stopped making phones. Rog 7 is the best.
English
1
0
1
27
Ryan's Model Y
Ryan's Model Y@ryanjaycowan·
@SawyerMerritt Model X is not available in Australia, so many Australian families (and NZ) have been waiting for the Y L. Very excited to see it on our roads.
English
7
0
70
4.1K
Peter Toth retweetledi
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
Tesla will be increasing the price of the Cybertruck dual-motor AWD tonight. Only hours left to lock in the $59,990 price.
Sawyer Merritt tweet media
English
138
120
1.2K
83.1K
Peter Toth
Peter Toth@compulog·
Congratulations @ebay you have made the worst experience in selling anything. Together with @Payoneer you have wasted 1 hour of my life. Funny how EBay once bought @PayPal to do these payments. Now it is doing it externally again...
English
1
0
0
312
Peter Toth retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
A groundbreaking medical study revealed that aging may be transmitted through the bloodstream via a protein called HMGB1. When researchers blocked this protein in animal tests, they observed remarkable results: damaged tissues began to repair themselves, and some age-related decline was reversed. This discovery suggests that aging is not simply an inevitable process of cell breakdown but may be influenced by specific molecular signals. If these signals can be controlled, aging could be slowed — or even partially reversed. Such treatments could revolutionize medicine, offering new ways to fight diseases like Alzheimer’s, arthritis, and organ failure, all of which are tied to aging. However, researchers caution that human trials are still far away. The study fuels hope that one day aging itself might be treated as a medical condition, reshaping human health and longevity.
Massimo tweet media
English
56
362
1.8K
79.4K
Peter Toth
Peter Toth@compulog·
@Devon_Eriksen_ Ever since I read this idea it has been living in my head rent free. Same with religion. Just LLM.
English
0
0
1
3
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
This is the typical pushback to my idea of some-humans-are-LLMs-not-real-people. Problem is, it's a not adaptive response. Y'all just fitted what I said into the paradigm of political debate. Being an LLM isn't about having a World-Object Model that's leftist, and therefore wrong. A model that's wrong is still a model. I'm talking about humans who lack a consequential model at all. Meaning that their World-Object Model is so sparse that it rarely ever drives their behavior. And all that behavior is driven by the training data for their language model instead. They essentially are ChatGPT. If you really understand this concept, you will realize that you cannot prove that someone is a Real Person by listening to what they say. There isn't anything that a Real Person can say, as a result of his World-Object Model, that you can't train an Human LLM to say by conditioning it with the right data set. The only way that you can discern the presence of a World-Object-Model is if you present someone with a situation that his training data didn't include. Like, what do you do if your car is surrounded by armed men? Do your actions align to the situation you find yourself in, and your reasoning about it? Or do they align to the ideological language manipulations you were programmed with? A Real Person would be able to construct a Theory of Mind for those officers and try to predict their behavior. That prediction could be wrong, but it would still be a prediction, implying the existence of a model. An HLLM, however, doesn't behave based on models and predictions. It selects behavior which aligns to the torrent of words which were used to train it to talk as if it were a person. But it's not a person in any meaningful sense of the word, because its inner universe is no more sophisticated than a bird's or a dog's. So if it guns the motor on its two ton heavy vehicle and points it at an armed man, with every appearance of the intent of crushing him into paste, then odds are that there is a lot less modeling of what this man will do about that than there is desire to oppose the man because the television said the man is bad. That's HLLM behavior. Over-responsive to linguistic programming. Under-responsive to models of truth. There's a story that AI researchers and developers tell each other a lot. I'm not sure if it ever actually happened, but it illustrates a principle we are constantly reminding ourselves and others of, lest we suffer the consequences of forgetting. Goes like this: Some military development outfit is trying to train a neural net to recognize tank profiles. So they take a tank out to some woods, partially conceal it in various ways, and photograph it a lot. Then the next day, they photograph the same woods with no tank. And then they have a training data set to feed to their neural net. Which very rapidly jumps to 99.9999...% accuracy. Yay. But do you see the problem? Our protagonists, real or fictional, only saw it when they tried different data, to test. Then accuracy fell right to no better than chance? Do you see it now? They photographed the woods on different days. The first day was sunny. The second was overcast. The neural net very quickly found that the most accurate predictor of tanks was sunshine. And our researchers had done nothing, in reality, but train a neural net to spot the whether. This is what AI types call "overfit". No Real Person, in the neural net's position, would make that mistake. Why not? Because Real People have a world-object model. If a Real Person notices that tanks and sunshine go together, he doesn't just run with it because it's in the training data. He asks himself whether tanks cause sunshine, or sunshine causes tanks, and neither one makes any sense at all in the model. So he rejects the correlation as coincidence. HLLM behavior is an expression of inputs. Real Person behavior is a consequence of a model. HLLMs will use words like "diverse" as synonyms for "good", because that's the association they were programmed with. They will say things like "diversity is our greatest strength" because they heard them a lot. But they never ask exactly how diversity is strength, like "what is the mechanism whereby they strengthen us?" They never ask how the people who made a dumpster fire of Hatti are supposed to help the United States. It's not just because they have no answer. It's because they never get as far as asking the question in the first place. Questions like this are meant to feed an internal model of how the universe works, and so for people who have no internal model, questions like this are meaningless. They don't care how the model is supposed to work, or if it works at all. They only care if what is being said aligns with their training data. In humans, we call this "indoctrination". I don't know if it's reversible, but we can't afford to let them vote.
Devon Eriksen tweet media
Launch! - Blue Haired Liberal@DBZYuYuYasha

@Devon_Eriksen_ Yall are overthinking this. We just like diverse immigrant communities and believe America was founded to support the importation and settling of a lot of people. It is extreme high on our hierarchy of values. And we will do almost anything, including die, for those values.

English
130
152
1.1K
43.5K
Peter Toth retweetledi
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
A vast number of humans, probably a majority, aren't people. They are large language models. I'm not saying this as a generality, as a clever or funny way of saying, "they are stupid". No. I mean something very concrete and specific, and there are a lot of people who appear very intelligent, maybe even win awards for writing good poetry or something, who are nevertheless not people, not fully sapient, just a large language model walking around in a human body. First, you have to understand what a large language model is. It's a computer (organic or inorganic), which has been trained on a data set consisting solely of language (written or spoken), and rewarded for producing language that sounds like the data set, and is relevant to a prompt. That's all there is in there. This is why ChatGPT and Grok lie to you constantly. It's not because they are somehow just indifferent to the truth — they actually do not understand the concept of "truth" at all. For something to be a "lie", or an "inaccuracy", there has to be a mismatch between the meaning of words, and the state of reality. And there's the critical difference. You see, in order to identify a mismatch between the state of reality, and the meaning of a sentence, you have to have a model of reality. Not just one model, of language. This is why Grok and ChatGPT hallucinate and tell you lies. Because, for them, everything is language, and there is no reality. So when I say someone is a large language model, I do not mean he is "stupid". He might be very facile at processing language. He might, in fact, be eloquent enough to give great speeches, get elected president, win the Nobel Peace Prize, and so on. What I mean is that humans who are large language models do not have a robust world-object model to counterweight their language model. They are able to manipulate symbols, sometimes adroitly, but they are on far shakier ground when trying imagine the objects those symbols represent. Which brings us to this woman. Most conservatives understand her behavior in terms of concepts like "suicidal empathy", or "brainwashing", or an "information bubble", interpreted as reasons why she is delusional, but the truth is far worse than that. To delusional is to have an object model of the world that is deeply and profoundly wrong. But to have an object model of the world that is deeply and profoundly wrong... you have to have one in the first place. To sapient humans, words are symbols, grounded in object model of reality, that we use to communicate ideas about that reality. We need those words because we don't come equipped with a hologram projector, or telepathic powers. But for another type of human, that object model isn't very large or robust at all. It consists only of a grass hut or two with a few sticks of furniture, and it can never be matched up with the palaces in the air which she weaves out of words. And so, to her, there is no reality. Or at least very little. Reality consists only of her and her immediate surroundings in time and space, and words referring to anything bigger or more complicated are not descriptions of reality... they are magic spells which will make other humans drop loot or give her social approval. You cannot correct her worldview with contradictory evidence, because there is no worldview to correct. You cannot confront her with the logical inconsistencies in her worldview, because her object model doesn't actually have any, it's not complex enough for that. The relevant parts of her world-object model can be summed up as follows: "If I say Goodthing, I get headpats and cookies from all the people like me." That model is simply not big or complicated enough to contain notions like self-defense or vehicular assault. She has no theory of mind for a man whose job includes violence. She cannot explain or predict his behavior. It is too far away from her daily experience to fit into her reality at all. And if she can't imagine things like these, how can she possibly imagine concrete meanings for vast and complex ideas like demographic replacement, culture shift, and western civilization? This is not about intelligence or lack of it. This is about what her brain is trained to do. Her upbringing, education, and life did not force, or even encourage, her to develop a robust world-object model. It wasn't necessary for her to get safety, approval, or cookies. She just had to be glib. So it really didn't matter if she had an IQ of 125, or whatever, because if she did, then she was just an IQ-125-large-language-model, and only used that brain capacity for writing clever poetry, and saying things that aligned her to her local social matrix. She couldn't actually understand the world no matter how smart she was, because her brain was trained up wrong. I don't know if this is correctable, or if there was some critical developmental phase that was missed, but it doesn't matter, because once the LLM-humans are adults, they won't sit still for corrective therapy, percussive or not. What's important is that they can't be taught things. They can be programmed to repeat stuff, and if you win a culture war, you can even program them to say the sensible stuff. But even then, they will just be saying it for headpats and cookies. They will never truly understand the sense of what they are repeating, because they don't understand things. They are just Large Language Models. And we have to figure out some way to take the vote away from them.
Devon Eriksen tweet media
Lauren Chen@TheLaurenChen

I just figured out why the Minnesota ICE death is bothering me so much. This liberal woman was willing to take on federal agents, to disrupt ICE operations, in order to protect criminal Somalis. Obviously, she probably didn't imagine she would be killed. But surely, she must have known that, at the very least, she could be arrested. She has three kids. So she was willing to be separated from her kids to protect criminal Somalis. Speaking as a mother, this is insanity. This is not rational thinking. What it is, instead, is the result of liberal brainrot that convinces progressive women they have more of a duty to nurture and protect poor, brown (criminal!) strangers than their own country, and hell, even their own children. I am praying for this woman's soul and for her family. But I mean it when I say this type of thinking is almost wholly responsible for the decline of Western civilization.

English
2.1K
3.7K
22.4K
3.1M