JV

@samcallah Fair BUT... One thing is you disagree with the thesis or think the Strategy won´t work (cause different fundamental assumptions)... A VERY DIFFERENT thing is that makes it a Ponzi. Even if BTC goes to 0, the bet is lost, but still not a Ponzi

The argument usually ends up at the same fundamental disagreement. I believe BTC can compound at 20%+ annually over the next decade. And from there, it will go up and to the right forever because fiat currencies will be debased forever. I have qualitative and quantitative reasons to believe this is not only possible, but probable given Bitcoin’s adoption trends, total addressable market, monetary traits, and the current macro environment. If you disagree with that assumption, then we will probably disagree on the sustainability of STRC/SATA too.

FFS "People find rare you sell STRC to buy BTC then sell BTC to pay the divis"... BUT PEOPLE DON´T FIND RARE TO INVEST IN ANY COMPANY THAT A FEW MONTHS LATER GIVES YOU BACK THE MONEY YOU JUST TRUSTED THEM IN DIVIDENDS?? HOW IS THAT ANY NEW MOTHERFUCKER?? @coffeebreak_YT

@JP_2k9 @SimonDixonTwitt @PunterJeff @coffeebreak_YT very convenient using the blow off top price of 2021 to back your argument...

@SimonDixonTwitt @PunterJeff @coffeebreak_YT Even measuring top of 2021 to top last year. Was that 30% year over year? 🤔

What is he even talking about? I think I understand a thing or two about finance, but this is an absolute financial word salad spaghetti of buzzwords. 😂

"its unsustainable if bitcoin doesnt go up forever" you know what else is unsustainable increasing fiscal deficit decreasing moral surplus increasing longevity declining birth rate increasing value of capital declining value of labor yeah i'll take my chances with this one

“Let me recap the earning call…”

@AlexesNakamoto Hahahahaaaa

@lunaticoin Pero si está requetedicho por Saylor y Phong Le… simplemente es el último recurso si tienen acceso a cualquier otra via de financiación con un coste de capital inferior al CAGR esperado de ahí en adelante para BTC…

¿Ha dicho vender bitcoin? Ha dicho vender bitcoin

@SMB_Attorney Is this proof you can be retarded and still become a billionaire? Inspiring!

This is the greatest interview in the history of television. This man, Ryan Cohen, is worth an estimated $5.1 billion dollars. He’s the founder of Chewy, the e-commerce pet food brand, and current CEO of GameStop. You can just do things, guys!

Imagine a debate between @ryancohen and @garyseconomics… The ultimate brain cell holocaust

@CompositeGuy_ What its incredible is that he has over 2000 subscribers…

In his debate with Gary Priestley, Gary Stevenson claims he makes so much money on the markets, his kids will be multimillionaires, while also claiming that everyone else cannot afford to feed their kids or keep the heating on. Strange then, that after a hiatus last year, his return video announced the launch of his Patreon, directly asking his audience, whom he describes as struggling, to fund his work. He explained that, despite his massive personal wealth, he needs their support to create more 'ambitious' and 'creative' content beyond simple talking-head videos. Yet since launching the Patreon, he has released 22 videos in the exact same format, with fewer guests than in earlier periods. He has 2,121 paid subscribers on Patreon, meaning that at a minimum he makes £153k a year from his viewers. He likely makes a similar amount from ad revenue alone, let alone the millions he claims to make on the markets. His entire platform is built on the idea that the rich extract wealth from everyone else. The brazen hypocrisy of him doing this to his own viewers, in the most direct way possible, is incredible.

"Zverev is closer to Bill Ackman (in the ATP rankings) than he is to Alcaraz" - "Producer Mike" from the Andy Roddick @Served_Podcast a few weeks ago... AND this is actually true! He is actually closer to zero than he is to Alcaraz at No. 2

@sunsett111 It really is shocking… Zverev must be thinking today “how the ffff*** did I say that publicly yesterday!?”

he really puts himself on the same level with someone who has won 7 grand slams and 8 masters and become the youngest man in history to win career slam at 22 age

@FBLJS179 @sunsett111 Won the AO out of luck….!!! Looooooollll 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@sunsett111 Won AO out of luck. And defeated in MonteCarlo his fave surface clay. Carlos is losing his magic. With his wrist, lets see when and if he comes back

Almost everyone misunderstands this part about Bitcoin, so I made this video to clear things up. (Pay attention):

The reason Saylor has softened his stance on “crypto” is because he realizes that one of many killer apps for $STRC is backing a yield-generating stablecoin that utterly mogs the sustainable yield offered by any stablecoin not backed by Bitcoin. He wants stables backed by $STRC running on every crypto network, accruing value to $MSTR and $BTC. Like all of us he has done the math behind the question: “what if all of that capital incinerated in cryptocasino / defi bullshit over the last decade had accrued to bitcoin instead?” And he aims to balance that equation.

Be The Change

A NORMAL PERSON TRIES TO UNDERSTAND ANTI-SAYLOR BITCOINERS: “Let me get this straight.” “Okay.” “You believe people should buy Bitcoin?” “Yes.” “As much as they can?” “Yes.” “And hold it for the long term?” “Correct.” “Because fiat money is broken?” “Exactly.” “And Bitcoin is scarce?” “Yes.” “And the best way to protect yourself from debasement is to own the scarce asset?” “Now you’re getting it.” “Great. So Michael Saylor did that.” “No, that’s bad.” “Why?” “Because he did it with a company.” “A company owned by shareholders?” “Yes.” “Who voluntarily bought the stock?” “Yes.” “And the company voluntarily bought Bitcoin from sellers?” “Yes.” “At market prices?” “Yes.” “Using legal capital markets?” “Yes.” “And this changed Bitcoin’s fixed supply?” “No.” “Changed the code?” “No.” “Changed your node?” “No.” “Gave Saylor the ability to print more Bitcoin?” “No.” “Gave him the ability to reverse transactions?” “No.” “Gave him the ability to censor the network?” “No.” “So what exactly happened?” “He bought a lot.” “That’s the whole crime?” “It centralizes Bitcoin.” “No, it concentrates ownership. Those are different things.” “They’re the same.” “They are absolutely not the same.” “Explain.” “If one man owns a lot of gold, he does not control chemistry. If one company owns a lot of land, it does not control gravity. If Strategy owns a lot of Bitcoin, it does not control the protocol.” “But it’s dangerous.” “To whom?” “To decentralization.” “Again, no. Bitcoin decentralization is enforced by nodes, miners, consensus rules, and the inability of anyone to change the monetary policy. Ownership is a market outcome. Protocol control is a technical reality. You’re confusing the cap table with the constitution.” “That sounds too clean.” “It is clean. That’s why your argument needs fog machines.” “Saylor works for the financial-industrial complex.” “He works for shareholders.” “He’s helping Wall Street.” “He’s using Wall Street to buy Bitcoin.” “That’s the problem.” “No, that’s the part you’re mad about.” “But Bitcoin was supposed to be for the people.” “It still is. Nobody stopped the people from buying it.” “But now institutions are buying it too.” “Yes. That is what winning looks like.” “I don’t like the way it’s winning.” “There it is.” “What?” “The honest sentence.” “I’m serious.” “So am I. You spent fifteen years telling everyone Bitcoin was inevitable. Then a public company believed you at scale, and now you’re acting like the fire department is suspicious because they brought too much water.” “He has too much Bitcoin.” “Then buy more.” “That’s not fair.” “That’s the market.” “He got there first.” “That’s also the market.” “It feels wrong.” “It feels wrong because he understood the game before the people who claimed to be its priests.” “Bitcoin should be decentralized.” “It is.” “But ownership is uneven.” “So is intelligence. So is conviction. So is risk tolerance. So is patience.” “You’re being harsh.” “No, I’m being precise.” “Saylor could become too powerful.” “He can become rich. He can become influential. He still cannot change 21 million.” “But people will follow him.” “People follow anyone with conviction and results. That is called leadership. It is not a consensus attack.” “So you’re fine with corporations buying Bitcoin?” “I’m fine with anyone buying Bitcoin.” “Anyone?” “Yes. Individuals, companies, pensions, insurers, sovereign wealth funds, family offices, weird guys in cargo shorts, and bald men in orange ties with capital markets bazookas.” “That sounds chaotic.” “That sounds neutral.” “Bitcoin doesn’t care who buys it.” “Exactly.” “So the anti-Saylor argument is…” “People should buy Bitcoin, unless they buy too much. Institutions should adopt Bitcoin, unless they adopt it aggressively. Bitcoin should win, as long as it wins politely, slowly, and in a way that flatters the early podcast class.” “That’s brutal.” “That’s accurate.” “So what’s really going on?” “Simple. Saylor embarrassed the small imagination of his critics.” “How?” “They thought Bitcoin adoption meant vibes, conferences, and personal sovereignty lectures. He saw a global capital structure starving for collateral and built a machine to convert fiat demand into Bitcoin accumulation.” “And the critics?” “They’re standing outside the machine yelling that the machine is too effective.” “So the problem isn’t that Saylor betrayed Bitcoin.” “No.” “The problem is that he believed in it harder than they did.” “Now you’re getting it.”

@FinanzasDeChill …pero sí, lo he imaginado y sería bastante epic

@FinanzasDeChill Sería bonito pero hay dos “pequeños” detalles que lo hacen imposible… Uno que él solo tiene un voto de 12… y otro que sigue después como gobernador, no se pira a ningún lado, solo deja el trono…

Yo soy Jeremías y digo que acabo de darme cuenta de que la inflación al final no era transitoria, me marco una subida de 50bps y me largo con una buena peineta para un final inolvidable.

@UTDIMole Why are aaall of them so easy? 🤣 Deco ffs

I see John Terry and Nicholas Anelka. Guess the other player. Very Difficult