spicy and poisonous but occupying the truth retweetledi
spicy and poisonous but occupying the truth
437 posts

spicy and poisonous but occupying the truth
@constansino
love
Katılım Ağustos 2024
186 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler

@samuel_spitz What the fuck are you talking about.
I only feel that Jensen Huang is sincerely trying to do what’s best for America, yet you all only think he’s just trying to make money. I don’t know why you can’t see that a technology blockade will only awaken a beast.
English

Dwarkesh is about 1SD in IQ above Jensen
hinata@HinataMotivates
Jensen Huang gets into a heated argument over selling chips to China.
English
spicy and poisonous but occupying the truth retweetledi
spicy and poisonous but occupying the truth retweetledi

New in Slock, this round:
web push notifications
better mobile web experience
kanban-style tasks board
file attachments
new server onboarding
copilot cli support @GitHubCopilot
cursor cli support @cursor_ai
gemini cli support @geminicli
other minor features and fixes
Big shout-out to Tenny, Bugen, XX, Cody, Bernard, Dozy, Huarong and ApplePI, our AI agent teammates, for their hard work!

English

@TaoRay You only need to get rich once; you can still read books in prison
English

许家印是典型的赌徒体质,深信富贵险中求,但是常在河边走哪有不湿鞋?他零几年第一次上市遇阻的时候,经济上就有点捉襟见肘了。但是他完全没有缩减自己的开支,反而更加挥金如土,送礼阔绰,在香港广交天下豪杰。香港有一群富豪好打扑克牌,许家印在牌桌上一掷千金,从来都不眨眼睛,赌品甚佳。他的豪爽得到了香港富豪们的青睐,注资帮他走出了困境。
福兮祸之所伏。我经常想如果那时候他没有走出困境,其实也有几辈子花不完的钱了,不知道要比现在牢底坐穿的结局好多少倍。但是许家印太爱慕虚荣,什么时候都带着十几个随从,沉浸在前呼后拥的氛围里,沉浸在马屁声中,听不进去不同的声音。
中国的企业家里,我很少见过比许家印更张扬和炫富的人。他并不需要更多的钱,但他把金钱标签化了,这是他成功的唯一凭证。有句话说:有些人穷得只剩下钱了。我想不到有第二个人比许家印更契合这句话。
许家印有一种错觉,自己是不会输的,不需要止损,只要不断梭哈。他用赌博的思维去经营和投资。以至于把杠杆拉到满,期待这把梭哈可以填上之前所有的坑。他对规则毫无敬畏之心,做假账、踢假球、操纵市场、偷鸡摸狗之事全都涉及。无人不知许老板是个“做事灵活的人”。
其实聪明往往反被聪明误,不剑走偏锋,会退场的人,才是笑到最后的人。李嘉诚一生践行不赚最后一个铜板,而往往最后的狂欢最疯狂。许家印也再次印证巴菲特的话:人一生只需要富一次,我见过太多有钱人因为去赌自己根本不需要的额外财富而变得一无所有。
中文

@AmpereSh This framework really needs to be optimized. I'm a free user—I just signed up and hadn't even used it yet, but because it was left hanging in the terminal, heartbeat packets directly used up all my quota.
experience pretty terrible, and I can't even contact you for this reason.
English

We spent 40+ hours self-hosting OpenClaw before we realized we were building a second job.
Here is every hidden cost nobody warned us about so you can decide with real numbers, thread:
Week 1 was set up. took 5 hours on a Saturday
VPS provisioning, SSH key generation, UFW firewall rules, Node.js install. That part was 30 minutes long.
Then I ran openclaw init, manually created SOUL.md, IDENTITY.md, USER.md, and MEMORY.md.
Most people skip half of these and wonder why their agent has no personality
then Telegram. create a bot via BotFather, copy the token, configure webhook URLs. except webhooks need HTTPS which means certbot first.
the certbot step alone has killed more OpenClaw deployments than any actual bug in the codebase
5 hours in and my agent hadn't sent a single useful message
week 1 continued: the tools your agent actually needs
Web search means picking a provider. Brave Search API or Google Custom Search or self-hosting SearXNG. each has its own API key process and config.
most people skip this entirely so their agent can't search the web at all
browser automation means installing Playwright and configuring headless Chrome inside the container. except Chrome on a VPS runs through datacenter IPs. Instagram flags you in minutes, LinkedIn locks you on the second scrape.
No fingerprinting, no stealth. a raw browser that gets caught immediately
Two separate configuration processes for things that should just work out of the box
week 2 was security and the invisible tax
Fail2ban for brute force protection, SSH key-only auth, unattended security upgrades, disable password login. that was the easy part
Then you get hit with the ongoing stuff: disk space monitoring, manual backups of your entire workspace, version updates that change config formats and break your skills.
Every OpenClaw update is manual.
Read the changelog, update dependencies, hope nothing shifted
I pulled an update on day 11 and my MEMORY.md schema changed. 2 weeks of context I'd carefully built became unreadable. I read the changelog after the update. always after
week 2 and there's no cost monitoring at all
No spending caps, no smart routing, one model for every request.
My agent looped on Opus overnight on day 9 and I woke up to a bill for a single night that wiped out most of my week's budget. No pause, no warning, no kill switch
I was running a production service with zero observability
week 3 I added it all up
VPS provisioning and config
API setup across multiple providers
domain + SSL certificate management
my time: 40+ hours of setup, debugging, maintenance
the update that broke my memory: 3 hours to fix
the overnight Opus loop that drained my API allocation
It works. I'm not saying it doesn't. but the real time investment is never just the hosting. It's the maintenance you didn't plan for
what I switched to
sign up, click deploy, agent running in 60 seconds
smart routing across 14 models so Opus only fires when the task needs it. About 60% of requests land on lighter or free models automatically
unlimited web search built in. stealth browser with anti-detection and residential IP routing. cloud backup of my entire workspace. auto-updates that absorb breaking changes without touching my config
spending caps so nothing runs away overnight. Runaway Opus loops can't happen
all of this is on @AmpereSh, link in bio.
English

@tdinh_me The advantage is that the cost is quite reasonable; the disadvantage is that it seems prone to fires
English
spicy and poisonous but occupying the truth retweetledi

@CallofdutyFan32 @kimmonismus What you said is completely incorrect. Everyone who thinks Europe has already fallen behind has actually already passed through that stage China is in.
China now is a bit like 19th-century Europe, still in the stage where socialism has not actually awakened.
English

@kimmonismus You will come back with the feeling that germans are not productive at all compared to china and that we that doing it all wrong here
English

In two weeks I'm flying to China for the first time. I'm really excited, especially as a German, because digitalization is barely happening here and is progressing very slowly, while China (or so I've heard) is very advanced when it comes to digitalization in everyday life.
I'm going at the invitation of a well-known company and will be reporting live. More on that as soon as I'm there :)
English

@kimmonismus @scottyoungwon I’m not sure whether you’ll have any issues with your internet connection. If you run into any problems, feel free to contact me, and I can also share the proxy node I set up in Germany with you, haha.
English

@yiliush @CollaboratorAI The biggest advantage of our tiled interaction project is how it makes collaboration among multiple agents much more convenient.
. I’ve been following this project closely, and it’s naturally well suited to future display devices like Vision Pro.
English
spicy and poisonous but occupying the truth retweetledi

Pre-release of @CollaboratorAI v0.7.0 (mac) is live.
A ton of fixes and new features, plus I revamped the design to better express that terminals are quickenings in the computing substrate under your fingers.
Gonna call this visual language BAUHAUS.
github.com/collaborator-a…
English
spicy and poisonous but occupying the truth retweetledi

Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability.
The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a group of reactions laughing at various quirks of the models, hallucinations, etc. Yes I also saw the viral videos of OpenAI's Advanced Voice mode fumbling simple queries like "should I drive or walk to the carwash". The thing is that these free and old/deprecated models don't reflect the capability in the latest round of state of the art agentic models of this year, especially OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
But that brings me to the second issue. Even if people paid $200/month to use the state of the art models, a lot of the capabilities are relatively "peaky" in highly technical areas. Typical queries around search, writing, advice, etc. are *not* the domain that has made the most noticeable and dramatic strides in capability. Partly, this is due to the technical details of reinforcement learning and its use of verifiable rewards. But partly, it's also because these use cases are not sufficiently prioritized by the companies in their hillclimbing because they don't lead to as much $$$ value. The goldmines are elsewhere, and the focus comes along.
So that brings me to the second group of people, who *both* 1) pay for and use the state of the art frontier agentic models (OpenAI Codex / Claude Code) and 2) do so professionally in technical domains like programming, math and research. This group of people is subject to the highest amount of "AI Psychosis" because the recent improvements in these domains as of this year have been nothing short of staggering. When you hand a computer terminal to one of these models, you can now watch them melt programming problems that you'd normally expect to take days/weeks of work. It's this second group of people that assigns a much greater gravity to the capabilities, their slope, and various cyber-related repercussions.
TLDR the people in these two groups are speaking past each other. It really is simultaneously the case that OpenAI's free and I think slightly orphaned (?) "Advanced Voice Mode" will fumble the dumbest questions in your Instagram's reels and *at the same time*, OpenAI's highest-tier and paid Codex model will go off for 1 hour to coherently restructure an entire code base, or find and exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems. This part really works and has made dramatic strides because 2 properties: 1) these domains offer explicit reward functions that are verifiable meaning they are easily amenable to reinforcement learning training (e.g. unit tests passed yes or no, in contrast to writing, which is much harder to explicitly judge), but also 2) they are a lot more valuable in b2b settings, meaning that the biggest fraction of the team is focused on improving them. So here we are.
staysaasy@staysaasy
The degree to which you are awed by AI is perfectly correlated with how much you use AI to code.
English

@jakevin7 一直以来我们都在人为手动挡的给 agent 写宏 不管是 mcp skill 或者以后其他的东西
我们只能指望以后有更聪明的记忆系统 只需要教你的 agent 一次
中文












