Jason Patterson

Me explaining to the Marketing Director that the organic content is only getting shared by our own employees.

Have we considered unleashing Space Force on Iran?

Content is really the least interesting thing marketing can do with AI.

Jensen Huang just called out every CEO who’s been firing people “because of AI.” Jim Cramer asked him why companies are laying people off if AI is supposed to make everyone MORE productive. Jensen's answer: "For companies with imagination, you will do more with more. For companies where the leadership is just out of ideas, they have nothing else to do. They have no reason to imagine greater than they are. When they have more capability, they don't do more." Read that again. The man who built the most important tech company on Earth just told you that if your CEO is using AI to cut headcount, it means one thing: They have no imagination. They have no vision for what comes next. They got handed the most powerful tool in human history and their FIRST instinct was to fire people. This is the CEO of NVIDIA. The company whose chips power every AI system on the planet. If anyone on Earth has the right to say "AI replaces workers," it's Jensen Huang. And he said the OPPOSITE. He said every carpenter could become an architect. Every plumber could become an architect. AI elevates capability. It doesn't eliminate it. But here's where it gets really interesting... During the same interview, Jensen revealed something nobody's talking about: He said AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic are seeing their revenues increase by one to two billion dollars a WEEK. And he wishes these companies were public so the world could see what he sees. One to two billion per week. That's a $50 to $100 BILLION annualized run rate. For companies that most people think are burning cash and making nothing. The entire Wall Street narrative that "AI companies aren't profitable" might be completely wrong. Jensen sees their numbers. He sees their compute orders. He sees their growth. And he's saying the revenue is real. So if the money IS real, why are other companies firing people? Because they're not building AI products. They're not creating new revenue streams. They're not using AI to expand into new markets. They're using AI as an EXCUSE to cut costs because they ran out of ideas 3 years ago and need something to tell the board. Jensen's company added $500 billion in new orders in 5 months. He expects $1 trillion in cumulative revenue through 2027 from just two product lines. That number doesn't include the new chips, systems, or partnerships announced this week. And he's not cutting people. He's hiring. Because when you have imagination, more capability means MORE opportunity. Not less headcount. Meanwhile Salesforce cut thousands. Meta cut thousands. Amazon cut thousands. All blaming "AI efficiency." Jensen's response: You're out of imagination. He also said something that stuck with me. Cramer asked if he ever thought he'd build a $10 to $20 trillion company while waiting tables at Denny's. His answer: "I was just trying to make it through the shift." Biggest tip he ever got? Two, three dollars. Now he's building tech that increased computing demand by one million times in two years. He announced OpenClaw, which he says is as big as ChatGPT. And he's got 21 months of new business that isn't even counted in the trillion dollar figure yet. When asked how long he plans to keep working? "I'm hoping to die on the job. And I'm not hoping to die anytime soon." This is a man who believes every single thing he's building. And his message to every CEO using AI to justify layoffs is simple... You're not innovating. You're surrendering. The technology wasn't built to shrink companies. It was built to make them limitless. If your leadership can't see that, the problem isn't AI. It's THEM.

The '80s have now truly ended.

@Haris1728 Therapy is for peopke who've experienced an exceptional event. If your life is just shit, it won't help.

@Haris1728 And everyone is fixated on making more stuff instead.

And the street punks. Whew, there were a lot of street punks.

It’s always quite hard to accomplish something when you’re not remotely sure what you’re trying to accomplish.

That's a good way of putting it. The NBA too often feels like a friendly pickup game.

The meme that keeps on giving.

If the 'concept' can't be understood without full body copy and nearly finished art direction, something is wrong. A concept should be so human that you can 'describe' it verbally, and people get it. Look at what's considered great ads - you'll see that they need no explanation

@tomfgoodwin @vlaurenlee "Gonna have to face it, you're addicted to efficiency."

@vlaurenlee Almost nobody is addicted to efficiency. Normal people spend a lifetime wasting time

The more I use ai the more I’m convinced we’re hardwired as humans to be addicted to efficiency. It just feels good. The fallacy is that we want to make tools so we can relax. The truth is the more efficient you become, the more you want to be EVEN more efficient. It feels powerful. Ai will probably turn more people into workaholics than it will generate lazy people.

@tomfgoodwin Mistake? How can you say that? The name was so elegant.

Perhaps metas metaverse is the greatest corp mistake made since AOL Time Warner ?

People who argue on LinkedIn using AI are the worst.

Too often, the weaker the advertising concept the higher the production costs. It simply takes more crutches to bear the weight a weak concept. Heavy special effects, animation, AI, and celebrities turn into crutches when the work lacks substance.

Click this post if you want to live. linkedin.com/posts/jason-pa…

It's quite interesting seeing people rewrite their bios and corporate experience to appear to be an AI expert. If you were so enthused about AI in 2016, why did you write a book on VR? If you loved AI in 2020, why did you go all in on NFT's?