Controversies of Science

112.9K posts

Controversies of Science banner
Controversies of Science

Controversies of Science

@controscience

I track scientific controversies

San Francisco, CA Katılım Ocak 2018
863 Takip Edilen4.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
The documentary I'm putting together is VERY long, + is really more like a freshman-level university course on scientific controversies. First of its kind. Will include curated reading materials, short videos, thought-provoking conversations + some relevant comedy.
English
3
0
14
618
Controversies of Science retweetledi
Saul Sadka
Saul Sadka@Saul_Sadka·
The IRGC can definitely hit the UK with a missile that can hit Diego Garcia, the distance is the same, and if it hadn’t been for the efforts of the United States and Israel, all of Europe would have been under a permanent jihadi nuclear cloud, since just as they were lying about the missile range, they were lying about building the nukes to put on the end of those missiles: nukes to destroy London, Paris, and Madrid, and bring about the Armageddon they are religiously bound to crave. No need to thank Israel and the United States for literally saving the world, but history will know what they did, and how the childish leaders of Europe stood on the sidelines and whined as the adults saved them from their own stupidity.
Piers Morgan@piersmorgan

So not only has Iran brazenly lied about its ballistic missile range capacity, but this means it can probably hit the UK with them - and we have zero, I repeat ZERO, defence against these missiles. Very worrying.

English
242
1K
3.5K
190.3K
Controversies of Science retweetledi
Chaos Coordinator
Chaos Coordinator@idontexistTore·
Elections are not REAL for over 2 decades. Selection, not election. Have you looked at your EXPERTS on this? Pilots, Green Berets, Infantry ... trashy CON INC pundits, fake patriots ... all with no ACTUAL hands on knowledge of RIGGING elections... Having you to look here and there rather than JEH JOHNSON SELF DECLARED CISA, and they FEDERALIZED THEM - Cares ACT gave all STATE IPS to CISA. CIS SECURITY (NGOish) all ELECTIONS. Come on - are we still chasing ballots? They did that on PURPOSE... The certifications are the ONLY direct hit, but they ignored that because it didn't make them money-now they decided to start looking that way -- I did say they would in 2020....when they can rack cash for it. IN OTHER WORDS - it was on purpose-- WHY? There are two answers: ONE: to run the clock on the statute of limitations while they parade around the US, taking your money and "canvassing" and hearing them speak while you buy a TWC product. LOL TWO: The PREVIEW is tonight.
English
20
280
470
10.9K
Controversies of Science retweetledi
Bluntly Put Philosopher (BPP)
Toroidal flask plasma transitions, so dope
English
3
26
144
6.5K
Controversies of Science retweetledi
Hans Amato
Hans Amato@HansAmato·
$8,400 on a gastroenterologist, an allergist, and 14 months of elimination diets before someone tested his zonulin levels Had a client come to me after being told he had IBS, possible Crohn's, maybe a "sensitive stomach." He'd cut out gluten, dairy, eggs, soy, corn, nightshades, histamine foods. Was eating 7 foods. Lost 22 pounds he didn't need to lose. Still bloating after every meal. Still waking up looking 6 months pregnant by dinner The allergist ran a skin prick test. Came back negative for everything. The GI ran an endoscopy and colonoscopy. Both clean. "Must be stress-related." Gave him a prescription for dicyclomine and told him to try yoga Nobody measured intestinal permeability. Nobody checked what was happening between the cells of his gut lining. Nobody even considered that the barrier itself was the problem, not the food passing through it We ran zonulin. Through the roof. His tight junctions were blown open. Every food he ate was triggering an immune response not because the food was the problem but because his gut wall was letting partially digested proteins into his bloodstream where they don't belong. His immune system was attacking food particles like foreign invaders because to his body they WERE foreign invaders The issue wasn't removing more foods. It was fixing the barrier. What we did: Stopped all further food restriction immediately. Reintroduced foods one by one while supporting the gut lining. Bone broth daily for collagen and glycine to support mucosal repair. L-glutamine at therapeutic doses for enterocyte fuel. Removed the actual triggers: chronic undereating, excessive cardio, and 4 cups of coffee on an empty stomach every morning (this mf was basically torturing his gut). Added zinc carnosine for mucosal protection. Restored caloric intake to actual maintenance. He'd been eating 1,600 calories at 185 lbs Within 6 weeks he was eating 30+ foods again. Bloating completely gone. The 7-food prison diet that three doctors endorsed was making him sicker by starving the microbial diversity his gut needed to heal $8,400. 14 months. And the answer was to eat MORE, not less btw if you're carrying a list of "safe foods" on your phone and it keeps getting shorter, your problem probably isn't food sensitivity. Your problem is barrier integrity. I go deep on gut permeability, zonulin, and exactly how to repair barrier function on my substack. link in bio
English
57
216
2K
124.7K
Controversies of Science retweetledi
Navid Mohebbi نوید محبی
This is Khamenei himself (with English subtitles) claiming that the regime’s ballistic missile range is limited to 2,000 kilometers & that he has imposed a ban on anything beyond that. You can never trust the regime in any agreement. Lying and cheating are in their DNA.
English
175
827
3.9K
154.5K
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@AI_evangelist42 @EMostaque Academics are already obsolete. The current system already ensures that no large changes can occur. All of the coming scientific revolutions will come from maverick outsiders working w AI - not the academic scientists.
English
0
0
1
6
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@AI_evangelist42 @EMostaque In theory, it could. But, their worst enemy will be their own aversion to against-the-mainstream science. That's where all of the new discoveries will come from. They've been fighting to destroy those competing ideas their whole lives, now they're just going to accept them?
English
0
0
0
5
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@AI_evangelist42 @EMostaque This would mean (a) acknowledging that they are no longer the expert; (b) abandoning their current career path; (c) pissing off all of their peers; (d) losing their grant funds; (d) getting blocked from publication. It would be professional suicide.
English
1
0
1
7
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@AI_evangelist42 @EMostaque Consider the hypothetical scenario where AI notices there are enough problems w our physics frameworks that it decides to abandon them in favor of a different framework that academics currently ignore or label as pseudoscience. Will the researchers blow up their own discipline?
English
1
0
0
9
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@EMostaque What led you to believe that predicting the next word spoken by mainstream science would produce accurate solutions to how the universe works? I am legitimately curious about what's happening in your head here.
English
1
0
2
73
Controversies of Science retweetledi
Katherine Graham
Katherine Graham@KateXGate·
Ghislaine Maxwell's triple agent father, Robert Maxwell, controlled who and what was published in the science world and made big bank doing it. Post WWII Maxwell started his scientific journal publishing company Pergamon Press, completely capturing the budding market. While he's credited with the expansion of scientific publishing and the flourishing of academic papers submitted to his journals, the greatest and most resounding effect he had was on the establishment of the peer review process. The only papers to get through the Maxwell controlled journals' "peer review" process were those that echoed the established narrative. Academic bias and group think was not organic. It was systematically engineered by many means but most resounding is the peer review system. What was allowed to go to print was curated, edited and meticulously cultivated by publishers. Academics and professors who didn't go along with consensus were unable to get published, spelling the loss of accreditation and the end of their careers. This system also resulted in the gradual dumbing down of textbooks, full on oppression of novel ideas and the near academic standstill especially in the sciences. So the answer to the question, why hasn't physics advanced since the 60s? "Peer review" is one big factor. And why would a triple agent be so big on publishing scientific journals? Who had the power to keep major scientific advancements out of print while also actively harvesting and siphoning off for personal use the findings and brilliant ideas presented freely by the best scienctists around the world?
Katherine Graham tweet media
English
0
3
6
125
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@Its_BS I'll have all of the AI researchers rushing to read this book once they get the big picture. And science will never be the same again. Positivism will die once + for all, + nobody will even miss it.
Controversies of Science tweet media
English
0
0
0
7
Controversies of Science
Controversies of Science@controscience·
@Its_BS That’s going to completely take Elon by surprise. None of the Positivists will see it coming bc they still don’t know what Constructivism even is. They’re trapped in the wrong epistemology for doing scientific discovery.
English
1
0
2
11
ItsBS
ItsBS@Its_BS·
Lord, help us... 🤦‍♂️
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@demishassabis There will be a little discovery along the lines of Newton or Einstein, but ~100% of intelligence output in the future will be creation of the new, rather than understanding the basic rules of reality. The pattern of the quarks, leptons & photons is almost everything.

English
2
0
3
94
Controversies of Science retweetledi
Paul White Gold Eagle
Paul White Gold Eagle@PaulGoldEagle·
THE DOMINO EFFECT NOBODY IS EXPLAINING TO YOU Iran is not just a country at war. It's a funding machine. Since 1979, the Islamic regime has been the single biggest financier of terrorism in the Middle East. Here is what collapses the moment that regime falls: DOMINO 1: Hezbollah (Lebanon) Iran sends them $700M to $1B+ per year. That is their entire war budget. No Iran = no Hezbollah. DOMINO 2: Hamas (Gaza) 93% of Hamas funding comes from Iran. $100-350M per year in cash. No Iran = Hamas has no money to fight. DOMINO 3: Houthis (Yemen) $100-200M per year in direct transfers. Plus weapons. Plus training. Plus IRGC commanders on the ground. No Iran = Houthis go back to being a tribal militia with AKs. DOMINO 4: Iraqi Militias Kata'ib Hezbollah. Asa'ib Ahl al-Haq. Badr Organization. All funded, armed, and directed by Iran's IRGC. No Iran = they lose their patron. Fast. DOMINO 5: Syrian Militias Iran spent $16 BILLION propping up Assad. The entire Syrian proxy network runs on Iranian money. No Iran = no money, no mission. People keep asking why this operation matters. This is why. One source. Five networks. Billions in annual terror funding. Pull the source. The whole network dies.
Paul White Gold Eagle tweet media
English
267
3.2K
5.5K
147.8K