cookiek
564 posts


@chronicalguy That’s so funny she make a decent jokes - after all she is married to a man who makes absolutely nasty remarks about women, disabled people, veterans of course anyone who has a different view than his … so that’s a good joke - unless she is serious??? 🧐 no way .. ha
English

@cody_willi65206 Can you provide plan as to how exactly that would happen ?? Where would the money come from? How would you generate revenue? Just leaving well okay but without a plan seems kinda pointless!
English

@MartyOqan B .. but should fire the President & his Epstein collaborator
English

@MAGAVoice Nope .. his remarks were tasteless but no more so than Trumps awful nasty rhetoric or actions when making fun of a disabled person.. he at least apologized so she can it up
English

@MAGAVoice No but y’all should go back to school for some listening skillls - she read a manifesto AT NO TIME DID SHE SAY IT WAS ABOUT TRUMP - however he answered as a guilty person would assuming it is about him so maybe you should ask him why he can to that conclusion??
English

@Ghostofcynthia @KariLake @NorahODonnell Did you miss the part where after she read it-did not say it was about him and he responded as he did she was only asking what his thoughts were but he“assumed”it was about hisself NEVER did she say it was but when he answered as he did she tried to say SO YOU THINK ITS ABOUT YOU
English

You're a horrible person, @NorahODonnell.
Reading a deranged shooter’s manifesto attacking President Trump on national TV, right after another assassination attempt, isn’t journalism.
It’s disgusting propaganda. They never fucking stop. This is why they keep trying to kill President Trump because of evil cunts like her.
They are the enemy of the people.
Go straight to hell, bitch.
English

@JackHayHomes @KariLake Really.. when should it be read? It’s a current news story!
English

@KariLake Reading a shooter’s manifesto on national TV the day after an assassination attempt. That’s not journalism that’s activism 🇺🇸

English

@paul_watkins62 @OccupyDemocrats Well then he should walk the floor to the other side - !!!!
English

BREAKING: Experts SOUND ALARM after Trump issues memo that could allow his staff to delete millions of White House emails in violation of record preservation laws.
The timing alone should set off alarm bells. The Trump administration is currently being challenged in court over its preservation of government documents. And this week, it issued new internal guidance that a leading archives expert says gives White House staff "license to do the exact opposite" of preserving records.
The memo, issued by White House Counsel David Alan Warrington to Executive Office of the President staffers, represents a "significant departure from historical practice" — Warrington's own words. It quietly rewrites the rules around which communications need to be saved and how.
University of Maryland professor Jason R. Baron, who specializes in archives and the law, read the memo and sounded the alarm immediately. The new guidance, he told the Washington Post, provides nothing that "prevents the White House from directing the transfer or destruction of White House records, including tens of millions of emails, either before or after the end of the president's second term in office."
The key sleight of hand is buried in the language. The memo says EOP components are "free to retain" previous record-preservation policies. As Baron points out, that also means they are free not to. Text messages now only need to be preserved "when they are the sole record of official decision-making" — and staffers are merely "encouraged" to memorialize those exchanges in another format rather than preserving the original exchange directly.
Translation: if someone decides a text isn't the "sole record" of something, they can delete it. And nobody has to take a screenshot.
Federal law is unambiguous. Presidents and their staff are required to preserve records related to government activity and turn them over to the National Archives at the end of each administration. Warrington’s memo, however, doesn't clarify whether these records will actually be turned over, and doesn't specify how Trump or Vance will personally preserve their own records.
This is the administration that used Signal to discuss active military strikes in a chat that included a journalist. The administration that has fired numerous inspectors general. The administration that is fighting records requests in court while issuing internal guidance that makes destruction discretionary.
"While paying lip service to the need to preserve White House records," Baron said, "the memo actually gives EOP staff license to do the exact opposite." Nixon erased 18 minutes of tape. Trump's team may be preparing to erase tens of millions of emails.
Please like and share this post if you believe the American people have a right to know what their government did — even after it leaves office.

English

@Mimimouse37 @0nlyk1tt3n He as the Holy Father interprets the word of Christ so that YOU may understand the word of God
English

@cookiek @0nlyk1tt3n Oh but no, he did not quote exactly from Scripture, he twisted the words to suit his person. Easy to check read what he said and then read the actual Biblical text.
English

@MbarkCherguia No not fat - not an appropriate description however beautiful seems to suit
English


@Mimimouse37 @0nlyk1tt3n So ridiculous- the Pope promoted peace & negotiation NOT war he quoted the Bible essentially doing his job as the Pope unlike Trump who has no idea how to be President
English

@0nlyk1tt3n Why would he do that? The Pope leads a Church, Donald Trump is not Catholic and does not differ to the Pope. He is the mist powerful man in the world. The Pope should not be interfering with US policy, but it did and that is a massive mistake.
English

@0nlyk1tt3n Hahaha.. all he does is bluster and lie .. his lips would turn black & his tongue swell if ever he spoke truth!!!
English

@liz_churchill10 Lies .. lies .. and more lies - but the that is all you know how to do as you can’t handle the truth!
English

I was called a traitor today for waving an Alberta flag and collecting signatures.
Think about that.
After a decade of this?
Aga Khan ethics violation
SNC-Lavalin political interference
Justice minister pushed out
Treasury Board president resigns
WE Charity insider deal
Finance minister ethics breach
Cash-for-access fundraisers
ArriveCAN $59M mess
GC Strategies contracts with no oversight
McKinsey sole-sourced consulting
Green fund conflict scandals
Foreign interference confirmed
Delayed and weak response from Ottawa
Winnipeg lab transparency concerns
Money laundering allowed to flourish
RCMP enforcement failures
International student fraud crisis
Immigration system being abused
Billions spent, little progress on First Nations housing
Unsafe drinking water still unresolved
Repeated Auditor General warnings
Multiple ministers violating ethics laws
And somehow… we’re the traitors?
At what point do people stop pretending this is just politics as usual?
This is a pattern. Not one mistake. Not one scandal. A pattern of broken trust, weak accountability, and a government that keeps failing the people it’s supposed to serve.
Calling that out isn’t betrayal.
Refusing to accept it isn’t betrayal.
Blindly defending it is.
At some point, every Albertan has to make a decision:
Do you go along with it… or do you stand up and say enough?
This fall, we will have a chance to make that choice.
Sign the petition before it’s too late and when the opportunity comes, vote YES for independence!

English























