@coresecret.eu

Lisbon Labour Court case, filed 23 May 2023, over unpaid employment-related claims dating back to Aug 2021. Claimed amount: €137,938. 30-second summary and timeline and redacted supporting documents: coresecret.eu/2026/01/10/arb… GoFundMe: legal costs and basic stability to keep the case going: gofundme.com/f/rechtsvertei… No one is obliged to help, but anyone who wants to can verify the basics in minutes.

I think the "researchers" need to do some more research on the cause of IQ dropping in Europe. I suspect there is another plausible reason.

Propaganda muss moralisches Wissen nicht löschen, sie muss nur die Selbstanwendung selektiv entkoppeln, bis aus Prinzipien bloss noch Signale werden und aus Doppelmoral ein sozial stabiles energetisches Minimum.

„Das war ein Vorspiel nur, dort, wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen.” Dieser Satz stammt von Heinrich Heine, aber kaum jemand weiß, in welchem Kontext dieser Satz steht. Der Satz stammt aus seiner Tragödie „Almansor“. Sie spielt im 15. Jahrhundert in Spanien. Der Satz wird von dem Moslem Hassan gesprochen. Er nimmt damit Bezug auf eine Verbrennung des Korans, die während der Eroberung des spanischen Granadas durch christliche Ritter unter dem inquisitorischen Kardinal Mateo Ximenes de Cisneros stattgefunden hat. Hassan: „So stürzten wir von jenen Höhen oft zermalmend auf das Christenvolk im Tal; und wenn sie sterbend röchelten, die Buben, wenn ferne wimmerten die Trauerglocken, und Angstgesänge dumpf dazwischen schollen, dann klang’s in unsre Ohren süß wie Wollust.“ Almansor: „Wir hörten, dass der furchtbare Ximenes, inmitten auf dem Markte zu Granada – mir starrt die Zung’ im Munde – den Koran in eines Scheiterhaufens Flamme warf!“ Hassan: „Das war ein Vorspiel nur, dort, wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen.“ Das ist der Kontext! Der Mann, der in dem Stück das Verbrennen des Korans kritisiert, hat selbst unzählige Christen geschlachtet. Während für ihn das Verbrennen des Korans eine Todsünde ist, klingt die Tötung von Christen in seinen „Ohren süß wie Wollust.“ Im Wissen um diesen Kontext bekommt Heinrich Heines Satz eine ganz andere Bedeutung: Auf der einen Seite kritisiert Heine zwar den Akt der Bücherverbrennung, aber auf der anderen Seite macht er auch die Doppelmoral deutlich, mit der ein Mensch zwar das Verbrennen von Büchern als Verbrechen verdammt, aber das Töten von Menschen als wollüstig schön bezeichnet. Eine Gesellschaft, in der das Verbrennen von Büchern verboten ist, das Töten von Menschen jedoch nicht, hat ganz eigene Probleme.

Verstehe ich das richtig? Man kann in Deutschland demnächst Bürger eines anderen Landes kostenlos krankenversichern aber nicht die Ehefrau? Man kann als Flüchtling/Migrant die deutsche Grenze übertreten und sich dann in Deutschland, von den einheimischen Klarnamenpflichtigen versorgen lassen? Deutschland scheint das beste Irrenhaus der Welt zu sein! 🦅#TEAMHEIMAT🇩🇪 #Krankenkassen #Klarnamenpflicht

Blog: „Deutschland darf kein Täterparadies mehr bleiben“ danisch.de/blog/2026/03/2…

@Hadmut Alles korrekt. Leider sagt dieses Sittenbild noch viel mehr über diejenigen aus, die sich eine solch unfassbare Torheit freudig bieten lassen. Die deutsche Nation und das Bürgertum sind vor langer Zeit untergegangen.

@RolandTichy Wie oft denn noch? Deutschland ist bereits mausetot. Die Gesellschaft befindet sich im Zustand der Leichenfledderei. Der Protagonist weiss es nur noch nicht. Was aber nun auch nicht wirklich überraschen kann.

Welcher Steuerhammer schlägt uns entgültig zu Boden? Immobilien-Steuer, Benzinsteuer, COP2-Abgabe - und jetzt noch Mehrwertsteuererhöhung. Heimlich bereitet wohl das Kabinett Klingbeil/Merz den nächsten Abgabenhammer vor. Denn auch 500 Milliarden Extraschulden reichen dem Gierstaat nicht. Bürgergeld, neue Beamtenjobs für Parteifreunde und Migrationskosten fressen alles auf. tichyseinblick.de/daili-es-senti…

@Hadmut Wunderbar! Dein vmPFC-Befund, Doppelmoral als Belohnungs-Rausch via Rudelkonformität, ist die neurobiologische Hardware zu meiner Steganographie / Narrativfilter-These: Narrative sickern versteckt ein, vmPFC verschiebt den Filter von Wahrheit zu Konformität. Passt hervorragend zu meiner Pauli-Desmet-Skizze, genau das energetische Minimum, der Nullpunkts-Attraktor. Zusätzlicher Aspekt:DE-Eliten, meist Politologen, Soziologen, sind mangels Methodenkompetenz besonders anfällig. China, KP-Naturwissenschaftler, zeigt den Kontrast und die USA, Juristen, belegt eindrücklich die jüngsten Aussagen von Jensen Huang betreffend Niedergang durch überbordende Bürokratie und Regelungswut. Dein "moral priesthood" der Jurisprudenz rundet es insofern perfekt ab. coresecret.eu/2025/12/07/ste… coresecret.eu/2025/12/09/von…

Blog: Gehirn und Doppelmoral danisch.de/blog/2026/03/2…

A truck carrying antiprotons will drive across Europe. A team at CERN just transported antimatter across the laboratory's campus in a truck. Literally. 92 antiprotons packed into a portable trap weighing one tonne. As everyone knows, antimatter annihilates on contact with ordinary matter - which is basically everything. The final destination is Germany: Heinrich Heine University in Düsseldorf. An extraordinary delivery in the history of road transport. home.cern/news/press-rel…

Moral der Antideutschen.

Rechte Hetze. 🤗

Lassen Sie sich nicht täuschen: Im Fall der Skandalnudeln Fernandes/Ulmen geht es nicht um Deep-Fakes: Erklärtes Ziel ist es, das Internet komplett Genehmigungspflicht zu machen. Jeder Klick nur nach staatlicher Erlaubnis. Der total überwachte Bürger ist das Ziel. tichyseinblick.de/daili-es-senti…

Lex Fridman asked Jensen Huang if he is afraid of death. Huang did not flinch. Huang: “The outcome that I seek, that I hope for, is that I die on the job instantaneously.” That is not a figure of speech. That is a man telling you he has already decided how this ends. No retirement. No transition plan. No golden years on a beach somewhere tallying what he built. He wants to be mid-sentence in a meeting the moment his heart gives out. And when you understand why, it changes how you see everything Nvidia is doing. Huang: “This is not a once in a lifetime experience. This is a once in a humanity experience.” Once in a lifetime means others have lived through something comparable. He is saying no one has. Not Edison. Not Ford. Not anyone at Bell Labs or Xerox PARC. The deployment of artificial intelligence at this scale, at this speed, with this much consequence has no precedent in the history of the species. And Huang is sitting at the center of it. That is not ego. That is geography. Nvidia’s chips power virtually every major AI system on Earth right now. He knows what that means. And he treats it with a seriousness most people cannot even summon for their own lives, let alone the trajectory of civilization. Then Lex asked about succession planning. Huang’s answer should be framed on the wall of every founder alive. Huang: “I don’t believe in succession planning.” Not because he thinks he is immortal. Because he thinks it is the wrong question entirely. The right question is what are you doing today to make yourself unnecessary. Huang: “The most important thing you should do today is to pass on knowledge, information, insight, skills, experience as often and continuously as you can.” He does not wait until retirement to hand over what he knows. He does not save his best thinking for a memoir. The second he learns something, it is already moving to someone else on his team. Before he has even finished processing it himself. Huang: “Nothing I learn ever sits on my desk longer than a fraction of a second.” Most executives hoard knowledge. It is how they stay relevant. How they justify the title. How they make themselves impossible to replace. Huang does the opposite. He treats his own mind like a relay station. Information comes in, gets amplified, fires out to every node that needs it. Every meeting is a transfer. Every conversation is a download. The goal is not to be the smartest person in the building. The goal is to make the building smarter than any one person in it. That is why he does not need a succession plan. If you spend every day making the people around you capable of running without you, the org never notices the moment you are gone. Your fingerprints are in how they think. But he is not planning to leave. Huang: “I really don’t want to die. I have a great life. I have a great family. I have really important work.” No drama. No existential spiral. Just a man who looked at death and filed it under problems that can wait. There is still too much to build. The people planning their exit strategies are playing a different game than Jensen Huang. He is not building a company he can walk away from. He is building one that outlasts his heartbeat because every person inside it already thinks in patterns he installed. That is not a death wish. That is a man who found the only thing worth doing and refused to do anything else.

@r0ck3t23 Jensen Huang nailed it: China engineers the future while the West lawyers it to death. One nation builds at exponential speed. The other adds layers of compliance, review boards and friction until nothing moves. This is exactly the "creeping complexity" trap I dissect: more regulations don't solve problems, they hollow systems out, Tainter's diminishing returns on complexity. East Asia still rides the ascending curve; the West is deep in collapse territory. My full analysis: x.com/coresecret_eu/… #AI #ChinaTech #Regulation #ComplexityCollapse #BuilderNation #JensenHuang @NVIDIA @lexfridman @elonmusk

Jensen Huang just explained why China is winning the technology race in two sentences. Huang: “Our country’s leaders… they’re mostly lawyers. Most of their leaders are incredible engineers.” One country sends engineers to lead. The other sends lawyers. One builds. The other regulates what was already built. Huang: “They showed up at precisely the time when technology is going through that exponential.” China did not stumble into the AI era. They arrived engineered for it. The education system produces engineers at a scale the West refuses to match. The competition is not tough. It is Darwinian. The culture rewards builders. Not commentators. Not consultants. Builders. Then the accelerant. Open source. When your talent pool runs that deep and that hungry, you do not hoard breakthroughs. You release them. The community multiplies everything. What costs American companies a quarter, Chinese teams finish in weeks. Not because they are smarter. Because the entire system points one direction. Zero friction between idea and execution. No committee. No review board. No eighteen-month compliance process. Then Huang said the part that should terrify Washington. Huang: “Their country was built out of poverty.” Comfort makes nations careful. Poverty makes nations relentless. When you built everything from nothing, you do not slow down to protect it. You accelerate because you still taste what nothing felt like. America built its dominance with engineers. The highways. The moon landing. The semiconductor. The internet. Then it handed the keys to the lawyers. Compliance departments. Regulatory bodies. Oversight committees. Review processes for the review processes. Every layer of protection is a layer of friction. And friction is a luxury you cannot afford when your competitor rides an exponential curve. Fridman: “It’s a builder nation.” Huang: “Yeah, it’s a builder nation.” No pushback. No qualifier. The West is not being outspent. It is being out-structured. Engineers ask how do we build this faster. Lawyers ask how do we build this without getting sued. One of those questions wins the century. The other writes a detailed report about why it lost.

@r0ck3t23 Jensen Huang is 100 % right: universities still train execution, but the market already wants the ones who direct the machine. One person and full AI command now replaces entire teams, in law, supply chain, sales, even farming or wiring jobs. This isn't just a productivity hack. It's the moment we must ask: what does it take for a system to develop persistent self, metacognition, internal simulation and true agency? My axiomatic framework shows why "artificial" intelligence is nature in a new causal package and why the Skynet fear is often just a shortcut. Full series: x.com/coresecret_eu/… x.com/coresecret_eu/… #AGI #ConsciousAI #PhysicalMonism #AIRevolution #JensenHuang @NVIDIA @sama

Jensen Huang just told every college student on Earth the one thing that determines whether they get hired. It is not their GPA. It is not their degree. It is not their internship. Huang: “If I have a choice between two, I would hire the one who’s expert in using AI.” He did not say prefer. He said hire. One gets the job. One does not. The only variable is whether you learned to use the machine. Then he went down the list. Accountant. Hire the one who uses AI. Lawyer. Hire the one who uses AI. Marketing. Supply chain. Sales. Customer service. Every function. Same answer. The person who can command the model does not have an edge. They are the only candidate in the room. Everyone else is applying for a job that no longer exists. Huang: “If you’re a carpenter, if you’re an electrician, go use AI. If I were a farmer, I would absolutely use AI.” That line should demolish every assumption about who this technology is for. This is not a Silicon Valley tool for software engineers. This is infrastructure for anyone who builds anything with their hands or their head. A farmer who uses AI to optimize soil, predict weather, and manage yields is not competing with other farmers. They are operating at a level that used to take an entire department. An electrician who uses AI to model loads, simulate wiring, and quote jobs in seconds does not compete with other electricians. They compete with firms. One person with the model replaces the output of a team without it. That is not a prediction. That is Tuesday. Huang: “Every college student should graduate and be an expert in AI.” Not familiar with it. Not aware of it. Expert. The university system is still training students to execute the work. The market already moved. It wants the person who directs the machine that executes it. Four years of tuition. Thousands of hours of lectures. And if you walk out the door without mastering the one tool that redefines every industry you could enter, you burned all of it. Huang: “I want to see what it could do to elevate my job, so that I could be the innovator to revolutionize this industry myself.” That is the part most people miss. AI does not replace ambition. It multiplies it. The carpenter who learns the model does not lose their craft. They scale it. The pharmacist who learns the model does not become redundant. They become dangerous. One person. Deep skill. Full command of the machine. That used to be called a company. The question is no longer what do you know. It is what can you build with the machine that knows everything. And the people who cannot answer that are not falling behind. They already fell.

Gilt das auch für virtuelle Hinrichtungen?