Sabitlenmiş Tweet
The Old Count Crow
14.5K posts

The Old Count Crow
@count_crowVT
Computer Science PhD Student. Recently getting into cybersecurity and relearning some of the fundamentals of logic/math. I like foreign languages and cultures!
Flying Higher than Before Katılım Nisan 2024
672 Takip Edilen198 Takipçiler

@LammyTanny60796 @xio999bsky You are an idiot acting in bad faith
Point to where they said there is no horror, go ahead and do that for the class, we’ll wait
English

@xio999bsky no no i hear there is no horror ever guys
so we gotta protect the lolis
English

As a guro artist, I will tell you, very nicely, that you are not the exception if this becomes normalized. They're not going to stop at what you don't like, they'll come for you too. To an outsider, your art looks like lolicon as well, so does a lot of anime art.
Joe 🥩 VGEN open 🥩@arminsfingers
Lolicon and pedobait artwork should not be apart of the art community. That shit is GROSS and you’re sick if you like that art
English

@JadeRiddle12 @theramblingfool But you can’t choose for them
It’s a private vote
That’s the whole point and why people choose blue
If coordination was possible everyone could just agree ahead of time to watch the vote count and push it towards 51+% blue together (because coordinating 100% red ain’t happening)
English

@theramblingfool Right, I have 5 kids. I assumed I'm choosing for them because they're not 18 and can't do basic risk analysis. They will literally chase a ball into a busy street, I'm not allowing them to make this choice.
English

Every Pro-red argument:
(1) Cynicism: "It's impossible for blue to win. Don't be suicidal."
(2) Narcissism: "There is no downside to pressing red."
(3) Changing the hypo: "Babies don't count. That'd be stupid! So there's a blender..."
(4) Psychopathy: "Blue pressers deserve to die."
(5) General poor analytic reasoning: "If everyone just pressed red!"
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Because nature
Without God,
Has no Laws except physics
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter It isn’t self evident
Under natural law the concept of ownership makes no sense
Because people are not property under divine law
If you mean the actual literal laws of nature then sure people own themselves but they can also own others by degrading them to property
English

Everyone presses blue = Everyone survives
Everyone presses red = Everyone survives
Most people press blue = Everyone survives
Most people press red = Red survives, but straight up all the blues get killed
Red is beneficial to only you, you don't even save anyone by choosing it
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Enlighten me, genius
Nederlands

@count_crowVT @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter oh so you Definity have 0 idea on natural law
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Once again
It is literally legal in some countries right now
English

@HumanCone_ @count_crowVT @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter nope that's you
you think rape can be legal. you think crime can be legal
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Ownership is not an objective quality that exists outside the context of a system of property
For a slave to inherently own themselves implies you’ve already conceded they’re property
You aren’t thinking this through
Under “natural law” no one is “owned” to begin with
English

@HumanCone_ @count_crowVT @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter no they would. OBJECTIVELY they would
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Define whim worship
English

@count_crowVT @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter still whim worship
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter No, because I do not worship laws or believe breaking laws is inherently wrong
You’re the one with the frozen abstraction here of “laws” as “justice” it seems
Entirely unable to conceive of someone who doesn’t respect them for their own sake
English

@count_crowVT @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter so your necesarily a whim worshiper
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Mathematical truths enforce themselves
If you don’t acknowledge them you get wrong answers, it’s a simple cause and effect
The NAP does not do this
Someone will obtain a decisive advantage before attacking, eventually
History reveals this
English

@count_crowVT @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter The NAP is unenforceable? Voluntary communities, reputation systems, private arbitration, ostracism — enforcement mechanisms don't require a state monopoly. But more fundamentally — mathematical truths are "unenforceable" too. That doesn't make them nonsense.
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Your failure to even acknowledge the material reality of how legal systems work when they’re not eradicated by space holocaust is further evidence you’re not prepared to exist in a society where they break down
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter No, I’m suggesting “laws” (not law as an abstract concept, but “laws” as actual contracts and rules enforced within society) are created by, you guest it, legislatures
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter A frozen abstraction would mean I didn’t acknowledge the existence of other definitions of law
I do, I just believe they’re wrong
You’re misusing the term
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter No, it isn’t
I even mentioned natural laws and ethics earlier in this discussion
But I also made the point such laws are unenforceable nonsense
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Your argument that laws can not be immoral is manifestly untrue because there are countries with unethical laws
Legal positivism is not a prescriptive position but a descriptive one
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter It’s a simple enough point
What I’m saying is that
Laws are enacted and enforced by governments
Therefore what is legal is decided by governments
This isn’t a frozen abstraction, it’s a position I hold
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter And who decides the legitimacy of a law? Legitimacy isn’t a real thing, it’s a social phenomenon
Rape isn’t always a crime
It’s always wrong under most moral systems but crime is an explicitly legal term
English

@HumanCone_ @count_crowVT @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter rape is always a crime no matter what authority says otherwise. Frozen abstraction of laws do not count as legitment law, they are perversions of truth.
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Citing “the virtue of selfishness” and quoting Ayn Rand really isn’t helping your case
English

@KiraSaku6a2 @HumanCone_ @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter Many forms of rape are actually legal in several countries and in ancient times they had systems where you could rape someone as long as you paid to marry them after
English

@HumanCone_ @count_crowVT @BBAlabandit @ThisismeCassieL @someBKLYNguy @cloud__alter rape is never legal
that is because law is NOT merely what the preferred authority says so
thus I can call any government a criminal organization when it commits OBJECTIVE crime
English