Clive Peedell

49.9K posts

Clive Peedell

Clive Peedell

@cpeedell

Consultant Clinical Oncologist. #NHS Campaigner. Steering committee @SABRconsortium & @BTOGorg. Views personal #radonc https://t.co/z25yqk0ERH

North Yorkshire Katılım Eylül 2011
3.4K Takip Edilen39.4K Takipçiler
Clive Peedell
Clive Peedell@cpeedell·
@AmarUKishan @PaulSargos On a positive note, this simplifies the whole approach and makes PSA response assessment to radiotherapy much easier. Incredibly reassuring to have this high quality data. A fantastic “negative” study!
English
0
0
1
24
Clive Peedell retweetledi
Amar Kishan
Amar Kishan@AmarUKishan·
Thanks @PaulSargos . "POSEIDON-2" tackles a question that arose frequently after the initial POSEIDON publication (thelancet.com/journals/lance…) -- would the conclusions of POSEIDON (no clinically or statistically sig OS benefit to adding HT to post-op RT) hold true if we enriched for adverse path features. We do show that adverse pathological features are prognostic, but an increasing burden of them doesn't interact with the OS benefit of HT.
Paul Sargos@PaulSargos

Out in @EUplatinum 👋 IPD meta-analysis of five randomized trials involving >4500 pts ⏩ Although adverse pathological features after RP are associated with worse outcomes, their cumulative burden does not predict the benefit of adding ADT to postop RT sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

English
5
10
33
2.8K
Clive Peedell retweetledi
Scott Lincicome
Scott Lincicome@scottlincicome·
“Another way of saying it is simply that we’re replacing the free market with the market for Trump’s affections.” Must read scoop from the WSJ: wsj.com/politics/polic…
Scott Lincicome tweet mediaScott Lincicome tweet mediaScott Lincicome tweet mediaScott Lincicome tweet media
English
48
626
1.4K
265.8K
Clive Peedell
Clive Peedell@cpeedell·
@henrywinter @IanMWelsh Infantino’s resignation must follow. This won’t stop #FIFA corruption, but it is the least fans of the game deserve. This is an unprecedented response to his autocracy and his position is now completely untenable
English
0
4
16
443
Henry Winter
Henry Winter@henrywinter·
It's over, Gianni. Infantino’s plan to invite venture capitalists to buy a stake in the World Cup and other FIFA tournaments is dead in the water. It's over. CONCACAF follows UEFA in rejecting his divisive plan. So that’s 41 + 55 national associations of the 211 against. So far. Strong statement from CONCACAF, echoing UEFA’s. "CONCACAF is a confederation united by the love of our game, where football comes first. Guided by this philosophy over the past 10 years we have built, from the ground up, an organization founded on service, transparent governance, and the long-term stewardship of football. History has shown FIFA and the football family what happens when the custodians of the game lose sight of these values.” The confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football convened meeting of its 41 members to discuss the “FIFA Forward Enterprise”, Infantino’s plan “to sell interests in the FIFA World Cup to private investors”. Infantino’s handling of the process, rushing decision-making, drew criticism. “During the meeting, the membership expressed deep concerns about the lack of due process surrounding the proposal, the artificially short deadline imposed, and the absence of any review or approval by the relevant FIFA governance bodies. In addition, the need for private equity investment to fund new and existing FIFA Forward programs following the most profitable FIFA World Cup in history was questioned. The discussion reinforced the need for greater transparency and proper governance.” So CONCACAF and its 41 members… “Rejected the proposal; Tasked their FIFA Council Members with engaging FIFA to determine how existing FIFA reserves could be used to increase FIFA Forward funding for football development across our region; And tasked their FIFA Council Members with instructing the FIFA President to ensure that any matter follows the proper governance processes via staff and FIFA Council, in accordance with the FIFA Statutes. “Through these actions, CONCACAF reaffirms that football's future - and its greatest asset - must remain in the hands of our football family.” 🙌🙌
English
369
1.5K
14.6K
1.4M
Clive Peedell retweetledi
Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD DSc(hon)
Hydroxychloroquine did nothing for Covid and studies showed that hydroxychloroquine toxicity was problematic. But no worries, because of climate change in a few years vivax malaria will likely return to the Potomac River and Wash DC and we’ll use the doses then…
English
8
1.1K
4.4K
122.3K
Clive Peedell retweetledi
UEFA
UEFA@UEFA·
Statement on behalf of UEFA and its 55 National Associations
English
7.8K
70.7K
378.1K
34.5M
Faisal Islam
Faisal Islam@faisalislam·
Would surely mean withdrawal from hosting the 2035 Women’s World Cup - interesting because the PM as GM mayor championed hosting final in Manchester at new Old Trafford
Ben Jacobs@JacobsBen

BREAKING: UEFA sources tell @talkSPORT all 55 Member Associations have decided to boycott the men's and women's World Cups in protest at Gianni Infantino's Fifa Forward Enterprise plans. UEFA members agreed on an emergency call that began around 2pm today that they will not support any FIFA-run tournament. 🎩 @martynziegler, who first broke the story.

English
38
20
74
38.9K
Clive Peedell retweetledi
Clive Peedell retweetledi
Martyn Ziegler
Martyn Ziegler@martynziegler·
BREAKING: UEFA countries unanimously in support of boycotting World Cup in protest at FIFA's plan to sell stakes in tournament to private investors, say sources. Decision taken at emergency virtual meeting thetimes.com/sport/football…
English
357
2.9K
15K
4.1M
Clive Peedell
Clive Peedell@cpeedell·
US leadership is collapsing. Plagued by Trumpism, MAGA cultism, Anti/science, and corruption. America’s enemies are destroying it from within
English
0
1
5
905
Clive Peedell
Clive Peedell@cpeedell·
@JoJoFromJerz @atrupar As a doctor, I just put my head in my hands. The GOP has collapsed into conspiracy theorists and MAGA cultists. Dangerous loonies are in power
English
0
0
1
42
Jo
Jo@JoJoFromJerz·
@atrupar Jesus Christ we are living in the upside down.
English
11
25
565
8.1K
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
Sen. Ron Johnson: "Dr Fauci fear-mongered, scare-mongered just like he did with AIDS. Remember that? 'AIDS is gonna be household transmission.' No, that's not it. But he did that the same way because he's a vaccinologist."
English
467
98
495
279.2K
Valerie Anne Smith
Valerie Anne Smith@ValerieAnne1970·
Fauci was WRONG about absolutely everything. We were RIGHT all along... - Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine worked - Remdesivir was & still is a killer - mRNA jabs are dangerous - Masks were a ridiculous joke - 6 foot 'social distancing' was a hoax - Lockdowns were worthless - PCR tests were 86% false (not real infections) - Case fatality rate was low - COVID came from NIH funded Wuhan lab - Fauci funded gain of function labs Fauci lied about everything. If his lips were moving... he was lying. Fauci lied to profit himself. Fauci harmed YOU to increase his ego, money, and power. Put the degenerate narcicistic villain in prison.
Valerie Anne Smith tweet media
English
807
5.9K
14.4K
345K
Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan·
This is simply not true and people need to stop declaring it, without offering any evidence for this claim: no, ‘the available evidence’ does not ‘overwhelmingly’ point ‘toward a research related incident in Wuhan as the origin of COVID-19’
Jamie Metzl@JamieMetzl

I believe the available evidence overwhelmingly points toward a research-related incident in Wuhan as the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. The U.S. government provided a relatively small amount of funding connected to research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the work explicitly authorized under those grants could not, by itself, have produced SARS-CoV-2. But money is fungible, and the deeper problem was that we were funding research in an institution where we lacked full transparency into what research was being conducted, by whom, and under what conditions. We should never make that mistake again. This matters as we consider broader scientific engagement with China. Collaboration can be enormously valuable, but only when there are enforceable standards of transparency, accountability, biosafety, and access to information. The relationship between scientists, research institutions, and the state in China is fundamentally different from what exists in open democratic societies. We cannot pretend otherwise. I also believe Dr. Anthony Fauci was wrong to argue so forcefully in the early months of the pandemic that the evidence favored a natural origin. As a Democrat and former member of a WHO expert advisory committee, it was clear to me in early 2020 that no one outside China had enough reliable information to reach a confident conclusion about origins. I believed then, as I do now, that a research-related origin demanded serious investigation. But accountability is not the same as vilification. Dr. Fauci has devoted his career to public health, and his work has helped save millions of lives around the world. He does not deserve the abuse and partisan attacks directed at him in today’s Senate hearing. He does deserve, like every official involved in the pandemic response, rigorous scrutiny of decisions that may have been mistaken. The Chinese government bears overwhelming responsibility for obstructing the world’s ability to understand how this catastrophe began, and that must remain the central focus of any serious origins investigation. But examining China’s failures cannot absolve us of examining our own. We should not have funded potentially risky research in laboratories where we could not demand full transparency, and U.S. officials should not have expressed confidence about pandemic origins that the available evidence did not justify. For six years, I have called for a bipartisan national commission on COVID-19. We still need one. I served as the lead Democrat on the Heritage Foundation’s COVID-19 commission, chaired by John Ratcliffe. That work can provide a starting point, but it cannot substitute for the comprehensive national reckoning we still have not had. Five years after the pandemic ended millions of lives and transformed billions more, this should not be about protecting political tribes, institutions, or reputations. It should be about finding the truth. We need to over every stone, follow the evidence wherever it leads, learn from China’s failures and our own, and then use those lessons to prepare for the next pandemic—which could be far worse than COVID-19 and could arrive sooner than we think.

English
186
165
1.3K
86.3K
Jamie Metzl
Jamie Metzl@JamieMetzl·
I believe the available evidence overwhelmingly points toward a research-related incident in Wuhan as the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. The U.S. government provided a relatively small amount of funding connected to research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the work explicitly authorized under those grants could not, by itself, have produced SARS-CoV-2. But money is fungible, and the deeper problem was that we were funding research in an institution where we lacked full transparency into what research was being conducted, by whom, and under what conditions. We should never make that mistake again. This matters as we consider broader scientific engagement with China. Collaboration can be enormously valuable, but only when there are enforceable standards of transparency, accountability, biosafety, and access to information. The relationship between scientists, research institutions, and the state in China is fundamentally different from what exists in open democratic societies. We cannot pretend otherwise. I also believe Dr. Anthony Fauci was wrong to argue so forcefully in the early months of the pandemic that the evidence favored a natural origin. As a Democrat and former member of a WHO expert advisory committee, it was clear to me in early 2020 that no one outside China had enough reliable information to reach a confident conclusion about origins. I believed then, as I do now, that a research-related origin demanded serious investigation. But accountability is not the same as vilification. Dr. Fauci has devoted his career to public health, and his work has helped save millions of lives around the world. He does not deserve the abuse and partisan attacks directed at him in today’s Senate hearing. He does deserve, like every official involved in the pandemic response, rigorous scrutiny of decisions that may have been mistaken. The Chinese government bears overwhelming responsibility for obstructing the world’s ability to understand how this catastrophe began, and that must remain the central focus of any serious origins investigation. But examining China’s failures cannot absolve us of examining our own. We should not have funded potentially risky research in laboratories where we could not demand full transparency, and U.S. officials should not have expressed confidence about pandemic origins that the available evidence did not justify. For six years, I have called for a bipartisan national commission on COVID-19. We still need one. I served as the lead Democrat on the Heritage Foundation’s COVID-19 commission, chaired by John Ratcliffe. That work can provide a starting point, but it cannot substitute for the comprehensive national reckoning we still have not had. Five years after the pandemic ended millions of lives and transformed billions more, this should not be about protecting political tribes, institutions, or reputations. It should be about finding the truth. We need to over every stone, follow the evidence wherever it leads, learn from China’s failures and our own, and then use those lessons to prepare for the next pandemic—which could be far worse than COVID-19 and could arrive sooner than we think.
English
187
97
632
395.7K
Clive Peedell retweetledi
Zara Quinn
Zara Quinn@_Zaraquin·
Dr. Fauci, who saved millions of lives in the USA, is getting treated harsher than all the Epstein perpetrators. USA is fundamentally damaged to its core.
English
4.2K
7.3K
59.6K
1.9M
Clive Peedell retweetledi
Ian L Richardson
Ian L Richardson@ianrich15813274·
There is something unspeakably vile about going after pubic servants who saved countless lives during the pandemic. Nobody liked lockdowns, they were a necessary response in a crisis. For twisted ideological reasons, some people have turned on those like Fauci in the US and Witty in the UK for doing their job. Hawley, Lowe, Paul, you are absolutely disgusting, unfit to clean the boots of the men you shamefully attack.
English
79
188
1.2K
13.4K
Clive Peedell
Clive Peedell@cpeedell·
@Eddie_Ho2025 Fortunately, he’s not as important as he thinks he is or you think he is. Radiology continues to attract high-quality candidates and work alongside AI in an area where it will continue to make huge positive changes.
English
0
1
1
183
Eddie Ho
Eddie Ho@Eddie_Ho2025·
Twenty years from now we won't have radiologists who can read scans. We'll have button-clickers who never learned what they're approving. Jensen wiped out the specialty that taught itself. #Radiology #AIHealthcare
Eddie Ho tweet media
English
1
1
2
286