Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡

20.3K posts

Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡 banner
Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡

Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡

@cpk

Dad. Storyteller. Software guy. Gen-Xer who does have time for any of this shit because there's work to do. Also: every right-wing accusation is a confession.

Seattle, Washington Katılım Kasım 2007
981 Takip Edilen608 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡
To expand: 1/the law is to protect their allies but not bind them; it is to bind their enemies but not protect them 2/every conservative accusation is a confession, either in the past or future 3/bottom line: the felt experience of power, rooted in bad faith
English
0
1
14
0
Master Alpaca
Master Alpaca@mralpacalips·
Likewise, I am neither fervently pro-life nor fervently pro-choice, more of the old-school approach that abortion should safe, legal and RARE. But if I were to believe that life begins at conception, then everything pro-life people say and do makes sense to me. I would say that overall right-wingers have a better theory of mind about the way left-wingers think not for any other reason than how much of leftist beliefs and discourse dominate culture, particularly media and academia. It's impossible to escape. Not the same for right-wing views, you are much more likely to encounter gross caricatures than the real thing.
English
2
0
2
169
Cassie Pritchard
Cassie Pritchard@hecubian_devil·
Libs love to talk shit on Stalin and collectivization, and sympathize with the kulaks—“they couldn’t have been that bad!”—but look at Americas farmers today, and tell me, Ezra Klein listener: you don’t long for the purges?
English
54
35
745
70.8K
cmg1973
cmg1973@Apologetics941·
Another stupid verse from the Book of Mormon(for thus it is called).
cmg1973 tweet media
English
21
1
30
1.8K
Neil
Neil@neipate96·
@cpk @HistoryBoomer the first paragraph is mostly true. the latter isn’t clear at all, plenty of cases of former slaves becoming slave owners. the few records of former slaves ( pre 18th century) don’t say much against slavery itself @realLPBeria @BamaExpat
English
1
0
3
94
Carl
Carl@HistoryBoomer·
Wanye's annoying conceit is that he's the liberal whisperer. He can read the minds of liberals and describe their strange ideas to his followers! But his liberals are straw men created to feed the vanity of his audience that they are smart, and liberals are dumb. It's a popular shtick, but it's dumb. (And wanye should know better. He's not a dumb guy.) You could find some liberals who fit wanye's caricature of all liberals, but most liberals (like the students I teach) agree that people in the past had a different understanding of morality. This is just nutpicking. There are fair generalizations you can make (and criticize) about liberals (and progressives, and conservatives), but that's not the game wanye's playing.
wanye@xwanyex

The primary conceit of the modern liberal is the belief in their heart that something like slavery is obviously, transparently morally repugnant and that therefore any people, including those in the past, should be able to see that. The only way to accurately understand the world is to have the courage to say that this is not correct. It’s not at all obvious. I would expect that if you played out human history 10 million times, you’d have slavery in almost every instantiation. This is because it would very clearly not be obvious to early people that slavery is universally wrong. In fact, I think it would be obvious to early people that slavery makes a lot of sense and so you’d have to work very hard over many thousands of years to develop a universal ethics that forbids it. This is not a minor confusion. I think it’s a pretty important aspect of the way modern people conceive of and evaluate history. But you can reject it!

English
47
15
358
22.1K
Jeff
Jeff@JeffWhampton·
@cpk @PaulLeach51 @HistoryBoomer If someone tells me they won the lottery, I could absolutely use Bayesian analysis to figure out the probability that their claim is true.
English
1
0
0
24
Carl
Carl@HistoryBoomer·
This is how the lottery makes money.
Carl tweet media
English
106
90
2.2K
55.6K
Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡
There's no nontrivial application of Bayes' theorem to the lottery. I mean, technically you're doing arithmetic when you repeatedly multiply a number by 1, but this is the mathematics version of digging a hole and filling it in again.
English
1
0
0
37
Jeff
Jeff@JeffWhampton·
@PaulLeach51 @HistoryBoomer Wait, why wouldn’t Bayes theorem apply to the lottery? It’s a method for determining probability, not a statement that says “everything is 50/50.” The fact that we can calculate the exact prior probability would just make bayes more precise.
English
1
0
2
32
Carl
Carl@HistoryBoomer·
How are the words "hors d'oeuvres" pronounced?
English
221
2
54
19.9K
Jim Bennett
Jim Bennett@StallionCornell·
@ion_eyes No, it isn’t. That’s pedantic nonsense. A word’s etymology doesn’t attach some secret meaning to how a word is used in common parlance. Similarly, the word “Christian” as it’s commonly used includes Latter-day Saints on its face, despite your attempts at private definitions.
English
2
0
24
625
Matthew Eklund
Matthew Eklund@ion_eyes·
LDS like to refer to themselves as Christian & Trintarians as "creedal Christians" But "creed" just comes from the Latin "credo" which means, "I believe" So distinguishing themselves from "creedal Christians" is basically admitting they're non-believing Christians (an oxymoron)
English
43
12
198
9.3K
Jared Bell
Jared Bell@jaredadairbell·
Asking for the exact moment the Great Apostasy began is like asking the exact day your grandpa got gray hair. We don’t know exactly when it started, but we all see that it happened.
English
80
8
400
27.7K
Jared Bell
Jared Bell@jaredadairbell·
@Lorenzo_Roybal What did the Protestants protest? Was it not their belief that the Church—institutionally and doctrinally—was corrupted? We didn’t invent that belief, we just confirm it.
English
5
0
13
297
Stacker
Stacker@stackerco·
If I get 20 more followers and reach 4K, I’m going to tell everyone the absolute worst things about my wife! I’m sure that would go over well …
Stacker tweet media
English
25
2
47
1K
Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡
A bunch of "no true scotsman" fallacies up in here. Capitalism is state recognition of private ownership of "the means of production," full stop. It doesn't presuppose free markets or a lack of regulation, or even total private control of capital. Nor does it preclude state or worker control of capital in all instances. Few systems of political economy are "pure". Nazi Germany was more like capitalism than it was communism.
English
0
0
0
16
Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡
@PopePiusIXStan Wait is he denying that Christ died, or is he denying "for our sins?" The latter is not in any historic creed nor in Paul's minimal confession. This is a doctrinal conclusion. I mean, once you've told the Pope to stuff it, you're a heretic either way, I suppose.
English
0
0
0
18
Stacker
Stacker@stackerco·
@KatKanada_TM @grok what is the logical fallacy found with these connections made in the Bible?
English
4
0
15
910
Kat Kanada 🏴
Kat Kanada 🏴@KatKanada_TM·
This is evidence that Scripture did not come from the mind of man. 63,000 connections 1500 years 40 authors 3 continents ONE cohesive story full of prophecies. God wrote this through men.
English
246
1.2K
4.4K
114.9K
Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡
1. The lines are always shorter in the unisex concept and move faster. 2. At the end of the night, the unisex bathrooms were far cleaner and much less likely to contain shit like drug paraphernalia. For some reason, people are more respectful of unisex bathrooms and don't crap them up. 3. Had way fewer problems with people having sex in the bathroom in the unisex case. Counterintuitive but maybe related to the "more respect" angle.
English
0
0
0
10
Brother Charlie ❤️🤷‍♂️🫡
Having worked in nightclubs with both concepts, individual private stalls plus common wash area outperforms two separate bathrooms in just about every possible way. Also if the space is large enough, you can even provide urinals that are shielded from view from the common wash area.
English
1
0
0
26
Rigo Valenz
Rigo Valenz@AlexRigoV·
@cpk @hecubian_devil Well there is actually because single-occupant bathrooms can only be occupied by 1 person at a time. Do I have to explain why that would be problematic?
English
1
0
1
220