voted for PPC (Allegedly white supremacist party)

@LoganLancing Tjat’s?

They think they own your children. Tjat's their impulse, here.

@ConceptualJames why does MAGA need an elite contingent in the first place? Trump is for those who are Americans as in those who uphold American values. Isn't it unlike MAGA to have elites I mean it's make AMERICA great again, not make the nominally right-wing gentry get what it wants....

Watching the entire society fold to the radical Left is the most disorienting thing I've experienced in my entire life. Watching Elite MAGA get pulled entirely into to the radical Right has been the most depressing.

@GadSaad or their saving face and pretending like they aren't at fault as the psychopaths and sociopaths and cowards they are

I’ve been invited for upcoming speaking engagements at Yale, UC-Berkeley, Columbia, and University of Chicago. Some in academia are waking up.

@JeffYoungerShow so anybody in the Lincoln Brigade during the Spanish civil war? They faught againsts Franco which was warm with HItler at the time

@FarazPervaiz3 is this a snippet of a video? If so, what is the original one?

“Five #Pakistani Muslim men harassed and raped me by touching my private parts. I tried to fight back but they hit me with a glass bottle breaking my lip and teeth!”

@LoganLancing That’s only if there’s no slow-moving traffic: britannica.com/search?query=M…

Cars are freedom.

@BillboardChris What about the times you were assaulted and continued to do this nonetheless

This man is representative of so many. He completely agrees and wanted to stop to say it was brave of us to be out here doing this. Honestly, this is my only disagreement with him. I don’t think it’s brave. I think my grandfathers who fought Nazis were brave. I’m holding a sign. I’m speaking truth about child abuse. This is not brave. It’s the minimum I can do. But yes, I get that people fear getting attacked and fear personal economic consequences, but fear is usually irrational and we can’t allow it to stop us. Anyway, very nice of him to stop and to encourage. His wife is a physician at the hospital. Hopefully this video starts some much-needed conversations inside, where kids in the gender clinic are being harmed.

Subversion: 15 Min Edition Demoralization: Infiltrate & undermine institutions, amplify antisocial Destabilization: Create internal conflicts & radicalize, leads to clashes Crisis: Collapse ➜ civil war | invasion Normalization: New authoritarian rule, discard old change agents

@ConceptualJames @Eamon_USA @BretWeinstein it sounds like woke is against the notion of a society seeing it as inherently oppressive

@Eamon_USA @BretWeinstein Woke is EXTREMELY EASY to understand in general. It means being culturally counter-hegemonic (with culturally revolutionary intentions). Sadly, it takes a lot of explaining to explain what that actually means.

People want a "simple" explanation of "Woke" that they can understand. There's a problem, though. You cannot define "Woke" without understanding the not-easy concept of "cultural hegemony." You cannot understand Woke Left or Woke Right without understanding cultural hegemony. You cannot understand why Tucker Carlson is Woke Right without understanding cultural hegemony. You cannot understand why the post-liberal Right is Woke Right without understanding cultural hegemony. You cannot understand why CRT, Queer Theory, radical feminism, or all the rest are Woke Left without understanding cultural hegemony. You can reduce it down to identity politics, victimhood centrality/culture, cancel culture, smearing, mob abuse, a "based ritual" or "Woke ritual," or whatever else, but you will never understand it until you understand cultural hegemony. Woke means having "woke up" to the "realities" of cultural hegemony. It is cultural Marxism or a kind of quasi-fascist reaction to cultural Marxism that plays on the same turf. When we say "Woke means having a critical consciousness," what it means is "having a critical consciousness of cultural hegemony." Woke Left is therefore Left-wing Cultural Marxists, i.e., Left-wing Gramscians. Woke Right is therefore Right-wing Cultural Marxists by Reaction, i.e, Right-wing Gramscians or Right-wing Counter-Gramscians, if you want. (Note: I frequently use the term "Woke" more generally for all these sociognostic dispositions including classical Marxism, Fascism, etc., but to be specific, it's this particular variant that became "Woke" rather than using the old 19th and 20th century terms.) Cultural hegemony means believing society is completely rigged against you through its culture by dominant groups who are seeking to maintain their illegitimate basis for their own power. That's all it means. It doesn't matter who the "dominant groups" are. We're familiar with the Leftist screeds: wealthy, straight, white, male, Christian, blah, blah, blah. The Rightist screed is that it's "liberals" and the Woke Left, who are then deliberately conflated as though they're the same thing when they aren't. So, Woke Right means believing the Woke Left has rigged society for the maintenance of its own illegitimate basis for power down to the very fabric of society and its culture (and that something must be done about this). What is to be done about the problem is always the same from the Cultural Marxist perspective: wage "counter-hegemonic" cultural warfare including by infiltrating the culture-producing institutions and converting them from within and/or building parallel culture-producing institutions (which can also be leveraged to achieve the infiltration). It's always this. Therefore, because being "Woke" is primarily a state of mind (lit. "awakened"), most of what being "Woke" means boils down to two things: 1) Believing some dominant group has rigged the entire societal and cultural game to its own illegitimate benefit, including down to what we should believe is "true," "false," "valid," and "invalid" (i.e., we live under unjust cultural hegemony); and 2) Believing that anything outside that rigged game that also challenges its dominance is therefore more "true" and "valid" while anything that supports it is more "false" and "invalid" (i.e., pushing cultural counter-hegemony). When CRT uses "counterstories" and "counternarratives" to challenge "existing dominant narratives" about race and "racism," it is identifying a "white supremacist" cultural hegemony (in a Woke, conspiratorial, lunatic, culturally Marxist way) and then challenging it with an outsider-knowledge counter-hegemonic play (again, based in a Woke, conspiratorial, lunatic, culturally Marxist way). Being "Woke" means preferring and advancing the counter-hegemonic (Cultural Marxist praxis) to the hegemonic (deemed to be illegitimately dominant). That means being "Woke" means preferring and advancing "other ways of knowing" or "just asking questions" (that which is outside the existing cultural hegemony and that challenges it) over "established knowledges" or "what we're allowed to talk about" (that which is inside the existing cultural hegemony and that maintains it). Do you understand? I am sorry that it cannot be made simpler than this if you want to understand it. You have to deal with this fact. Now look at the whole "just asking questions" or Tucker Carlson's whole shtick. Is it this? Yes. It is. Now look at the whole "postwar consensus" narrative, which allegedly only allows certain very limited right-wing thought to be considered legitimate ("valid"). That is a theory of cultural hegemony, people. A Woke Right theory would posit that the postwar consensus as a cultural hegemony needs to be challenged and overthrown. It would decry anything that disagrees as being motivated by a desire to keep the current cultural hegemony (postwar consensus brain, and particularly "Boomer mindset," since Boomers were the first children raised in the "postwar consensus"), or a functional inability to see outside of it ("false consciousness"). Thus it prefers counter-hegemonic narratives challenging and critiquing it. Thus it also alleges that anything that disagrees with their analysis is motivated by a corrupt desire to maintain the status quo of the current consensus, or that it comes from the false consciousness engendered from being within it (cultural hegemony as cultural capture). The goal of a Culturally Marxist (Gramscian) move is to occupy the positions of cultural dominance with counter-hegemonic thinkers and actors and displace thinkers and actors who "maintain" the current alleged cultural hegemony. Does that look like how the Woke Right acts? Yes, of course it does. Why? Because that's what they're doing. Are they doing it on purpose, though? Yes, in many cases, they are. Is it Woke? Yes, Woke af.

@CBHeresy youtube.com/watch?v=cm4dBA…

1. She’s not a literal fucking communist. 2. I’ve never worried about being on an airplane with a Hindu screaming “Krishna is Great!” before detonating their shoe. So, yes, I’m fine with a conservative Hindu First Lady over a Soviet Communist.

@ImWatson91 fuck the counselor

@MattWalshBlog part of why he's like this is that he's a narcissist.

This dude has the IQ of a pancake. Really a strikingly stupid person. He says that he disagrees with Zohran's platform yet he agrees with his "vision for the city" (which is somehow distinct from his platform, apparently). Then he calls Zohran a "real New Yorker" even though the guy's from Uganda and has only been a citizen for like six years. Just totally incoherent.

@IanAdAstra @ConceptualJames Heretical? Usury is haram. Usury is a fundamental part of commerce. How is anti-capitalism haram ?

@ConceptualJames Someone should highlight the ludicrous alliance between Muslims & woke socialists. Muslims were historically dedicated to commerce as per Muhammad's example. Muslims built trading networks extending over half the planet. NYC's Muslim mayor elect's war on capitalism is heretical.

Remember when I told you the Woke would concentrate their efforts and consolidate inside their strongholds back in November right after the election?

@gummibear737 @ConceptualJames Gnostic dog whistle?

@ConceptualJames Dave admitting that his whole shtick is about people waking up to the real truth! Shocker😂

Dave Smith explains why he doesn't like me anymore. Spoiler alert: it's because he doesn't have the slightest idea what's going on.

@CBHeresy the eyes chico, they never lie

I’m noticing a pattern.

@NiohBerg If you remember where you learned this-What is your source/sources? Not saying you’re wrong.

You did not "put the Shah back in power". Mossadegh was non-democratically selected by the Iranian Parliament, and he proceeded to rip up the Iranian constitution to overthrow the monarchy. CIA involvement was not the defining factor in the Shah removing him. The Iranian army, the clergy, the bazaaris and the upper classes all wanted Mossadegh gone. This would have happened irrespective of what America did or did not do. You did not install the Shah. He was in power since 1941, and had an incredibly brief exile in 1953 which Iran as a nation fought to correct. That wasn't regime change. It was an internal power struggle at best which would have ended the same way regardless. The only regime change I will argue America was involved with, was when Jimmy Carter stabbed the Shah in the back in 1979, told the Iranian army to stand down, and paved the way for Khomeini to return. Your fear and guilt stemming from 1953 has been astroturfed by revisionist mullahs who in 1979 didn't even list it as a major grievance. They are now weaponising 1953 to delude you into thinking there is no way a post-mullah Iran won't be a chaotic mess. Again, I completely understand and respect you don't want America involved in a war. I hope you won't have to. But your reasoning for why is completely flawed. I can't stress enough that Iran is not its neighbours. Don't vilify regime change in Iran as a concept. It doesn't have to be delivered by America, but it must happen for the sake of our people. Thank you.

@ConceptualJames LSE? London School of Economics?

LSE fellow (Fabian Communist) has opinions. Nobody cares.

@PahlaviReza Not my fellow countrymen. First he says “just right now..”

The Islamic Republic has come to its end and is collapsing. What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together we will turn the page of history. Now is the time to stand up; the time to reclaim Iran. May I be with you soon.

@ConceptualJames Operational prep of the environment?

I'm once again telling you that if they can't corrupt Trump, which I don't believe they can, they will turn on him viciously and all at once. They've already laid all the preliminary narratives.

@DanHollaway Noticers? U mean noticing every little thing as somehow it ties back to Jews?

As annoying as the “noticers” are, the right wingers trending towards neocon bs in response is equally annoying. There is very little independent thought amongst the people you follow.