Tanis

@Xaveriusoktora I've seen x-rays of feet wearing high heels and the resulting damage after years of wearing them. Regular shoes are doing the same because of the invisibly elevated heel - just slower. As much as I love the look of high heels, I wouldn't wear them outside of my bed. 😉

love it when people are creative with what they like. I really like the design of these high heels. 🥰

Alcohol doesn't cause cancer. But alcohol destroys cells, or body sends specialized cells yo repair the damage. If the person has a certain metabolic disease the repair process can't be stopped and a tumor develops as its symptom. The metabolic disease is the cancer but the pharmaceutical industry managed to label the symptoms as disease so everyone ignores the metabolic disease and its root causes.

Legitimate question: Has anyone actually PROVEN 'alcohol' & NOT something else is 'carcinogenic'-that's NOT probable, attributable, theoretical, strongly associated, estimated, uses questionnaires/models/fake genetic tests? Please provide the reference so I can read it🙏

@IntegralAnswers @LiberateNDs @Pablosquest You did not provide scientific evidence for the existence of a pathogenic entity causing Ebola disease by natural ways of transmission. You provided pseudoscientific studies violating scientific standards. Maybe this helps understanding the issue: drsambailey.com/why-nobody-can…

@LiberateNDs @crianza @Pablosquest I’d put them on the level with flat-earthers. I’ve provided exactly what they’ve asked for. They’ve repeatedly ignored answering a simple question: “tell me what evidence would change your mind?”

1/ Dr. Craig Spencer says this Ebola outbreak in the DRC immediately alarmed many outbreak experts because the initial case count was already larger than many Ebola outbreaks ever become. Within days, it ranked among the largest Ebola outbreaks on record. Key concerns: • spread into Uganda • unrelated transmission chains • delayed detection • conflict zones complicating response • limited healthcare infrastructure “This is definitely going to get much worse.”

@LiberateNDs @IntegralAnswers @Pablosquest Since Enders, virology basically claims Santa exists because when they set up a plate of cookies, eat half of them and pretend having not to, it proves Santa's existence. So maybe you understand why people who know what science actually means are rejecting this bullshit.

@crianza @IntegralAnswers @Pablosquest it’s pointless to argue with virus deniers. They’re actually more ignorant than anti-vaxxers.

@IntegralAnswers @Pablosquest @LiberateNDs Of course you do. Name the study you think fulfills Koch's postulates for Ebola and therefore proves exustence of EBV as cause of a disease.

@crianza @Pablosquest @LiberateNDs I disagree.

@van_eckert @AlexWallasch Das war schon 1933 so und da waren die sogar zu dritt (KPD, SPD, NSDAP). Die Geschichte wiederholt sich offenbar.

@AlexWallasch Es gibt nationale und internationale Sozialisten, die einander nicht mögen, aber ein und dasselbe totalitäre Mindset teilen. „Das Schlimmste, was einem Sozialisten passieren kann, ist, dass sein Land von Sozialisten regiert wird, die nicht seine Freunde sind.“ - Ludwig von Mises

HahHaha

📱𝗗𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗶𝘀 𝗸𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘁 ++ 𝗘𝗨-𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗳𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝘂̈𝗿𝘀 𝗦𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗽𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗯 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲++ 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗵𝘂𝘁𝘇-𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗻 Die Bundesregierung treibt den digitalen Ausweis voran: Künftig soll der Personalausweis direkt am Smartphone gespeichert werden können. Auch Führerschein und weitere Dokumente sollen später in die sogenannte EU-Digital-Brieftasche wandern. Und das könnte bereits ab der zweiten Jahreshälfte 2026 schrittweise eingeführt werden! Offiziell heißt es: Alles freiwillig, alles sicher, alles praktisch. Doch Kritiker warnen: Wenn Ausweise, Verträge, Altersnachweise und Behördengänge immer stärker über eine zentrale digitale Identität laufen, entsteht eine gefährliche Abhängigkeit vom Smartphone und von staatlich regulierter Infrastruktur. Was heute als „Erleichterung“ verkauft wird, könnte morgen zur Voraussetzung für Alltag, Reisen, Banken oder Online-Dienste werden.

@AUF1TV Ich freue mich schon auf den Anruf bei der Hotline, um das auf meinem Siemens A60 zu installieren. 😁

@AnnemitRedhair Das mag in eurem Weltuntergangskult so verbreitet werden, interessiert aber keinen, der weiss, dass es im Mai regelmäßig über 30 Grad warm wird.

So sollte es Mitte Mai nicht aussehen 🥵

@IntegralAnswers @Pablosquest @LiberateNDs The unsupported claim is EBV has been proven to exist by fulfilling Koch's postulates. You didn't provide any evidence for it, you named a few studies you assumed to do the trick. None of them fulfilled Koch's postulates.

Hardly, I’ve provided the evidence…you’ve just chosen to ignore it. Probably your best angle, given your apparent lack of knowledge and or comprehension. Rather than making unsupported claims, lay out the kind of evidence you’d want to see to prove yourself wrong? Dare you…

@IntegralAnswers @Pablosquest @LiberateNDs See my other reply to this.

I doubt your capacity to read and understand the published literature, but since you insist: Isolation of Ebola virus from infected hosts Experimental inoculation into healthy non-human primates Development of Ebola disease Re-isolation/detection of Ebola virus from experimentally infected animals These are among the foundational studies used to establish Ebola virus causation in modern virology. ⸻ Foundational Experimental Evidence 1) Jahrling PB et al. — Experimental Ebola infection in rhesus monkeys Jahrling PB, Geisbert TW, Dalgard DW, et al. Preliminary report: isolation of Ebola virus from monkeys imported to USA. Lancet. 1990;335(8688):502-505. What it demonstrated: Isolation of Ebola virus from infected monkeys Viral characterization using microscopy and immunohistochemistry Evidence linking the isolated virus to disease pathology This paper helped establish direct virological isolation methods in primates. ⸻ 2) Jaax NK et al. — Direct experimental infection of healthy rhesus macaques Jaax NK, Davis KJ, Geisbert TJ, et al. Lethal experimental infection of rhesus monkeys with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus by the oral and conjunctival route of exposure. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 1996;120(2):140-155. What it demonstrated: Healthy rhesus macaques experimentally exposed to purified Ebola virus Animals developed classic Ebola hemorrhagic disease Viral infection confirmed post-infection Demonstrated transmissibility and reproducible disease induction This is one of the clearest direct demonstrations that isolated Ebola virus alone can cause Ebola disease in healthy primates. ⸻ 3) Johnson E et al. — Aerosol infection model Johnson E, Jaax N, White J, Jahrling P. Lethal experimental infections of rhesus monkeys by aerosolized Ebola virus. International Journal of Experimental Pathology. 1995;76(4):227-236. What it demonstrated: Controlled exposure of healthy rhesus monkeys to Ebola virus Development of fatal Ebola infection Confirmation of viral replication and disease progression Important because it reproduced disease under tightly controlled laboratory conditions. ⸻ 4) Geisbert TW et al. — Detailed pathogenesis and re-isolation evidence Geisbert TW, Hensley LE, Larsen T, et al. Pathogenesis of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in cynomolgus macaques: evidence that dendritic cells are early and sustained targets of infection. American Journal of Pathology. 2003;163(6):2347-2370. What it demonstrated: Experimental infection of healthy macaques with Ebola virus Progressive Ebola disease mirroring human infection Extensive viral detection in tissues and blood Recovery/re-identification of Ebola virus from infected animals This paper is frequently cited as one of the strongest modern primate models of Ebola disease. After you review these papers and if you are not convinced, do us both a favor and carefully define what evidence you would accept.

None of them provides what I'm asking for. If you think it does, post a link to the full text containing evidence on the fulfilment of Koch's postulates. And don't try selling the virology definition of 'isolation' as isolation. Koch's postulates - just as any other valid proof of a pathogenic entity - require the isolated entity for characterization, not some sample assumed to contain an imaginary virus.

Here you go… Here is a concise, verified reference list documenting the core chain of evidence: Isolation of Ebola virus from infected hosts Experimental inoculation into healthy non-human primates Development of Ebola disease Re-isolation/detection of Ebola virus from experimentally infected animals These are among the foundational studies used to establish Ebola virus causation in modern virology. 
 ⸻ 
 Foundational Experimental Evidence 1) Jahrling PB et al. — Experimental Ebola infection in rhesus monkeys Jahrling PB, Geisbert TW, Dalgard DW, et al.
Preliminary report: isolation of Ebola virus from monkeys imported to USA.
Lancet. 1990;335(8688):502-505. What it demonstrated: Isolation of Ebola virus from infected monkeys Viral characterization using microscopy and immunohistochemistry Evidence linking the isolated virus to disease pathology This paper helped establish direct virological isolation methods in primates. 
 ⸻ 
 2) Jaax NK et al. — Direct experimental infection of healthy rhesus macaques Jaax NK, Davis KJ, Geisbert TJ, et al.
Lethal experimental infection of rhesus monkeys with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus by the oral and conjunctival route of exposure.
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 1996;120(2):140-155. What it demonstrated: Healthy rhesus macaques experimentally exposed to purified Ebola virus Animals developed classic Ebola hemorrhagic disease Viral infection confirmed post-infection Demonstrated transmissibility and reproducible disease induction This is one of the clearest direct demonstrations that isolated Ebola virus alone can cause Ebola disease in healthy primates. 
 ⸻ 
 3) Johnson E et al. — Aerosol infection model Johnson E, Jaax N, White J, Jahrling P.
Lethal experimental infections of rhesus monkeys by aerosolized Ebola virus.
International Journal of Experimental Pathology. 1995;76(4):227-236. What it demonstrated: Controlled exposure of healthy rhesus monkeys to Ebola virus Development of fatal Ebola infection Confirmation of viral replication and disease progression Important because it reproduced disease under tightly controlled laboratory conditions. 
 ⸻ 
 4) Geisbert TW et al. — Detailed pathogenesis and re-isolation evidence Geisbert TW, Hensley LE, Larsen T, et al.
Pathogenesis of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in cynomolgus macaques: evidence that dendritic cells are early and sustained targets of infection.
American Journal of Pathology. 2003;163(6):2347-2370. What it demonstrated: Experimental infection of healthy macaques with Ebola virus Progressive Ebola disease mirroring human infection Extensive viral detection in tissues and blood Recovery/re-identification of Ebola virus from infected animals This paper is frequently cited as one of the strongest modern primate models of Ebola disease. 
 ⸻ 
 Why These Studies Matter Together, these studies satisfy the modern virological adaptation of Koch’s postulates: Step Evidence Virus associated with disease Ebola consistently found in infected hosts Isolation Virus isolated and cultured Introduction into healthy host Healthy primates experimentally infected Same disease reproduced Animals developed Ebola hemorrhagic fever Re-identification Ebola virus detected/re-isolated from infected animals Viruses required adaptation of Koch’s original bacterial framework because: viruses cannot reproduce without host cells many cannot be grown on simple culture plates molecular methods are often required But the underlying causal logic remains the same. 
 ⸻ 
 Additional High-Quality Reviews CDC Overview CDC Ebola Virus Disease Overview WHO Ebola Fact Sheets WHO Ebola Virus Disease Fact Sheet Comprehensive Review Peters CJ, Sanchez A, Feldmann H.
Filoviruses as emerging pathogens.
Seminars in Virology. 1994. Summarizes the experimental evidence accumulated from primate studies establishing Ebola causation.

@IntegralAnswers @Pablosquest @LiberateNDs Appeal to authority. 🥱

@Pablosquest @crianza @LiberateNDs They may be meaningless to you, but if you spent a few years studying this, a few more in sophisticated labs, you’d probably realize you’ve wasted much of life believing viruses don’t cause disease.

@IntegralAnswers @Pablosquest @LiberateNDs What's the point repeating the OP's idle claims when I was asking for scientific evidence?

@crianza @Pablosquest @LiberateNDs

I'm aware that your post doesn't address the question. The OP claimed Koch's postulates have been fulfilled for EBV. The postulates were created to prove exustence of pathogenic agents in general and of course they can be applied to any pathogen. They tried it with viruses but naturally failed at isolation, so they tried first to change them (Rivers) then redefined 'isolation' and came up with a pseudoscientific method to replace the postulates entirely. Of we've come a long way in the past 100 years. All the worse that in all this time virology wasn't able to provide any scientific evidence on the existence of a single pathogenic virus. This is not about identifying a genomic fragment, this is about isolating and separating a particle and proving its pathogenity and contagion. PCR is useless here as it relies on primers and template derived from the proven to exist virus. You don't have a valid virus, therefore you don't have a valid genomic sequence, therefore you can't PCR test for it.

Hey Tanis, Are you aware that Koch’s postulates were created in the context of bacteria and not viruses…you knew that right? You realize, we’ve come a long way in past 100 years, right? Find your way to Bangkok and I might even demonstrate how we identify viruses literally everyday in one of the biggest molecular biology labs in SE Asia. Do you want to talk about PCR? Do you have any experience using PCR? Or Are you a simple virus denier?

Erinnert ihr euch an den Aufstand als Höcke 'Alles für...' sagte? Weil das die Nazis ja auch sagten? achgut.com/artikel/deutsc…

@JarvisAeneas Climate has been changing forever, no need to fuss about it. The point is 'man made climate change' and that's where Christopher Hitchens quote comes in:

I’m starting to think that I’m the only right-winger on this platform who believes that climate change is a real phenomenon. Not saying it hasn’t been exaggerated in the media, but I just don’t see how you can wholesale reject it.

2030 approaches. Tick tock.

@gerhard_zeiler Fünf Dinge auf diesem Bild versuchen dich zu töten. 😉

Viele reden nur von Ernährungsumstellung – ich ziehe es durch! 50 %-Mayonnaise. ☝️ Das nennt man Disziplin und eiserne Selbstkontrolle. 💪

Honestly, I’m sick and tired of grown adults calling the climate crisis a hoax. It’s not even a debate, the science has been settled for decades. Your ignorance is not just embarrassing, it is actively destroying the planet and every living thing on it.