Richard Reesor

10.2K posts

Richard Reesor banner
Richard Reesor

Richard Reesor

@crreesor

Producer of fresh market vegetables in the US and Canada. Interested in sustainable food system discussions. Distance runner for fun.

Katılım Mayıs 2013
666 Takip Edilen670 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Richard Reesor
Richard Reesor@crreesor·
Running my 5th marathon in 3 years tomorrow. Terry Fox keeps this accomplishment in perspective. #Respect
Richard Reesor tweet media
English
8
0
62
0
Richard Reesor
Richard Reesor@crreesor·
@Lyonseed @JacobNederend Y axis is an index. So graph is showing change over time. Trending in different directions. I believe this is probably true.
English
0
0
0
11
Richard Reesor
Richard Reesor@crreesor·
@TerryDaynard @kevinki16180099 @ryankatzrosene Yes, but if farmers get to place where they purchase what they can afford based on credit availability or cash flow, it’s likely yields will not be reduced very much. This is different than the economically optimum rate, but a practical consideration for many farmers.
English
0
0
1
27
Terry Daynard
Terry Daynard@TerryDaynard·
@crreesor @kevinki16180099 @ryankatzrosene One thing we have learned is that economical optimum rate often does not correlate closely with annual differences in corn yield - which, unfortunately, makes our task more difficult.
English
1
0
1
37
Prof. Ryan Katz-Rosene
Prof. Ryan Katz-Rosene@ryankatzrosene·
How tragically ironic would it be if an attack on one the world’s most important fertilizer feedstocks just days after Paul Ehrlich’s death caused the collapse of human civilization via widespread famines?
HealthRanger@HealthRanger

I believe we are standing on the precipice of the most profound, intentional collapse of human civilization in recorded history. The trigger isn’t a meteor, a supervolcano, or even a world war in the traditional sense. It’s the potential destruction of a single industrial facility: the Ras Laffan liquefied natural gas (LNG) complex in Qatar. Modern civilization doesn’t just run on energy; it is fundamentally architected on a steady, massive flow of natural gas, supercooled and shipped as LNG. This isn’t an abstraction. Our global food supply, our industrial chemical production, and the very stability of nations are tethered to this flow. That tether is frighteningly thin. Qatar's Ras Laffan is the heart of this system, a nexus of technology and geography that is effectively irreplaceable. Its 14 processing 'trains' and the critical Main Cryogenic Heat Exchangers (MCHEs) that chill gas to -260°F are marvels of engineering, but they represent a catastrophic single point of failure. As noted in energy literature, the specialized machinery for this process is made by only one or a handful of companies globally. This infrastructure isn't just important; it is singular. Its loss would not be a temporary market disruption. It would be a decade-long severing of the global energy artery. The recent, deliberate sabotage of critical infrastructure like the Nord Stream pipelines has shown us that such attacks are not theoretical. They are tools of geopolitical warfare. When you understand that over half the world's food depends on fertilizer made from natural gas, the picture becomes horrifyingly clear. We have built a world of astonishing abundance on a foundation of shocking fragility. One facility, in one volatile region, now holds the key to whether billions eat or starve. Two of QatarEnergy's 14 LNG trains have now been destroyed. The rebuild time is 3-5 years. If all 14 trains are destroyed, 25% - 50% of the world's current population will starve. Trump did this.

English
5
14
73
8.3K
Richard Reesor
Richard Reesor@crreesor·
@TerryDaynard @kevinki16180099 @ryankatzrosene Yes. Some of the hot takes I’ve read in recent days claim “corn needs 180 lbs of nitrogen” as if it’s all or nothing. Price will dictate rates and the higher the price the more precise growers will attempt to be in determining rates.
English
2
0
1
23
Richard Reesor
Richard Reesor@crreesor·
@kevinki16180099 @ryankatzrosene Yes, the analysis is very weak. Corn growers can cut N rates by a third and most seasons the effect on yield is fairly minor. Adjusting ethanol mandates would quickly free up food if grain supply was short.
Richard Reesor tweet media
English
1
0
1
34
kevin kimball
kevin kimball@kevinki16180099·
@crreesor @ryankatzrosene Could cancel ethanol and even with very little fertilizer could still grow enough food.,..And ,just maybe we would not be land filling a lot of leftovers or imperfect foods..Hope you & farm are doing good
English
1
0
1
50
Jacob Nederend
Jacob Nederend@JacobNederend·
@crreesor I was looking at it trying to find the ol’ 2015 baseline year fallacy and instead it turned out the whole thing is just a hallucination
English
1
0
0
25
Philip Shaw
Philip Shaw@Agridome·
@crreesor @globeandmail Its more fun buying other things Richard , but you go ahead. All my life I've had no interest in autos of any kind
English
1
0
1
58
Richard Reesor retweetledi
Tyler Watt 🇨🇦
Tyler Watt 🇨🇦@tylerwatt·
Remember when Ford said he wouldn’t touch the Greenbelt - then got caught on tape? Is this a man you can trust? Without FOIs and journalism, we’d never know the extent of the corruption behind Ford’s Greenbelt scandal. Now he’s rewriting the rules to hide what happens behind closed doors. Ontarians deserve transparency - not a government that covers its tracks. #onpoli
English
49
545
1.2K
18.6K
Richard Reesor
Richard Reesor@crreesor·
@agronomistag @MikeGrunwald It probably depends on your latitude. You could probably make a calculator that predicts viability of cover crops for C sequestration and soil health based on normal accumulation of GDDs for a growing region.
English
1
0
0
37
Andrew McGuire
Andrew McGuire@agronomistag·
@MikeGrunwald Yes. I would say it is easier to justify them for erosion control than for soil health, C sequestration, or adding nitrogen with legumes. All the latter goals have the cost of allowing the cover crop to grow during the good growing season, when we like to grow cash crops.
English
2
0
4
149
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦@andrew_leach·
Why? Because it's politically convenient to pretend that the impact of industrial carbon pricing is both large and hidden. In reality, it's a small fraction of what was previously the impact of the consumer carbon price in total carbon pricing costs of burning a litre of diesel.
English
2
10
44
4.5K
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦@andrew_leach·
For years, we talked about the wells-to-wheels emissions from oil sands to remind people that most of the emissions from refined products came from combustion by the end user and a small share was from the production and refining of the oil. Many seem to have forgotten that now.
English
3
11
48
2.8K
Richard Reesor
Richard Reesor@crreesor·
@Simonsscribbles No, but I wondered why the planning department and council approved these buildings in rural lands.
English
0
0
3
84
Keith Wells
Keith Wells@KeithWells6·
@crreesor @Kotyjo So if we have offsetting credits making net cost immaterial why even bother having a tax. What a farce we are paying for
English
1
0
1
53