Crypto_X
387 posts

Crypto_X
@crypto13x
Bir öğretmen değilim ama yıllardır bildiklerimi, gördüklerimi, deneyimlerimi, bazen de hayattan süzdüklerimi paylaşmak için burdayım..

Thank you for highlighting this excellent example. We will be publishing a Medium article explicitly detailing how an organization like @CertiK employs deliberately misleading methodologies. This is a recurring pattern in Web3, audit firms essentially 'rent out' their reputations for a price. From Hatch Network to the Multichain hack and the Ronin Bridge there are dozens of projects that were fully audited yet suffered catastrophic hacks. In this ecosystem, an audit signature is no longer a seal of security, it is a receipt confirming that 'money was paid and a report was generated. CertiK's report lacks objectivity. It is a biased document that avoids direct falsehoods while distorting the truth. This isn't science, it is strategic consultancy. The distinction lies in the ability to manipulate the same dataset to produce entirely different narratives. Our definitive stance, While Qubic leverages the '15.52M' (Big Lie) figure in its marketing, they point to #CertiK as the source. CertiK, in turn, buried critical caveats in footnotes while keeping the headline misleadingly clean. Together, they have mastered the art of 'creating a false impression without technically telling a lie.' This is a textbook case of plausible deniability fraud it may pass a legal test, but it is an ethical lie." Certik 🤮

What you will find inside the article, The independent verification of Qubic's 15.52 million TPS claim, run against the public RPC anyone can query. The actual sustained throughput on mainnet measured at 287 TPS over 24 hours, with a 95 percent confidence interval of 253 to 319. The full breakdown of the CertiK Performance Analysis Report, page by page, showing exactly where the headline number came from. Spoiler, one tick, three seconds, one TxHash. The mechanism of the trick explained in three parts. Metric substitution. Single tick generalization. Plausible deniability fraud. The 100 lines of Python that anyone can run to reproduce every number in under three minutes. No CAPTCHA, no funded wallet, no permission from any project foundation. The four predictable defenses pre empted in advance, so neither #Qubic nor @CertiK can credibly walk back the conclusion. A direct verdict on the Web3 audit industry. Hatch, Multichain, Ronin, and now Qubic. The audit signature has stopped meaning security. It now means a receipt for payment. One sentence that sums the whole thing up. 15.52 million was the convenient number. Qubic 287 is the actual one. @mefai/the-52-000x-lie-how-qubic-and-certik-manufactured-the-tps-fraud-in-web3-0ccb09aa313c" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@mefai/the-52-…

Thank you for highlighting this excellent example. We will be publishing a Medium article explicitly detailing how an organization like @CertiK employs deliberately misleading methodologies. This is a recurring pattern in Web3, audit firms essentially 'rent out' their reputations for a price. From Hatch Network to the Multichain hack and the Ronin Bridge there are dozens of projects that were fully audited yet suffered catastrophic hacks. In this ecosystem, an audit signature is no longer a seal of security, it is a receipt confirming that 'money was paid and a report was generated. CertiK's report lacks objectivity. It is a biased document that avoids direct falsehoods while distorting the truth. This isn't science, it is strategic consultancy. The distinction lies in the ability to manipulate the same dataset to produce entirely different narratives. Our definitive stance, While Qubic leverages the '15.52M' (Big Lie) figure in its marketing, they point to #CertiK as the source. CertiK, in turn, buried critical caveats in footnotes while keeping the headline misleadingly clean. Together, they have mastered the art of 'creating a false impression without technically telling a lie.' This is a textbook case of plausible deniability fraud it may pass a legal test, but it is an ethical lie." Certik 🤮








最近很少看推特,今天刷到针对友商创始人的恶意拼图,让人非常反感。 有不同意见,可以讨论;有不同看法,也可以批评。但用这种低俗、恶意、羞辱性的方式去表达,真的让人很难认同。 很多问题都可以回到事情本身去说。产品也好,业务也好,技术也好,这些都可以拿出来讨论,哪怕尖锐一点都没关系。可如果最后只剩下冒犯和恶意,那就已经不是在讨论问题了。 尊重行业,也尊重这个行业里的每一个参与者,这本来就该是最基本的边界。




Another day, another first... Aster listed Asteroid before anyone else. If you’re serious about leverage trading, access to first listings isn’t optional it’s everything. Hyperliquid missed it again...











