Xultation

1.3K posts

Xultation

Xultation

@cryptoant13

Pulsechain #PLS / #PLSX / #HEX

UK Katılım Haziran 2021
309 Takip Edilen559 Takipçiler
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@RB078_NL I have multiple wallets and only my main wallet got the #HEX airdrop
English
1
0
2
185
RB078 🇳🇱 hexican
They are sending HEX to wallets that are no longer, or never will be, active again... 🤌 What do you call this? 😋
English
9
1
14
2.2K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@PulseDai Surely 0.07% is more then enough cover any impermanent loss risk😂
English
1
0
1
22
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@PulseChainStats Hey Grok "list the top ten proof of stake crypto blockchains by the amount of active validators" VERY Healthy Blockchain
Xultation tweet media
English
0
0
2
105
PulseChainStats.com | PulseChain Stats & Portfolio
1,129 validators have exited in the last day from PulseChain network, the last 1000 to exit just over a week ago were from ValidatorX liquid staking, they sold 1,129 validators $289,000 at todays prices Will they sell or do something else?
PulseChainStats.com | PulseChain Stats & Portfolio tweet media
English
15
12
101
3.5K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@HexStinna Why bring millions of eyes on an underperforing asset unless something big is about to unfold 🚀
English
1
0
4
145
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@GreyhoundWhale Why bring millions of eyes on an underperforing asset unless something big is about to unfold 🚀
English
0
0
6
64
Greyhound Whale
Greyhound Whale@GreyhoundWhale·
Still being dispersed. Up to 3.5M holders on eHex so far. What are your thoughts on this?
Greyhound Whale tweet media
English
8
8
35
1.4K
Brandon - BuildTheTech.com
Six years of building, grinding, sacrificing…time, energy, and effort that honestly can’t even be measured at this point. Yesterday, I broke. I sat there and really thought about everything… and came to a hard conclusion: no one actually cares about what I’m doing. Not in the way I thought they would. Not in the way I hoped. So I’m done. I’m stepping away permanently. No more building. No more pushing. No more trying to force something into existence that people clearly don’t value. I gave it everything I had. Check comments for my donation info.
English
40
6
109
7.1K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
Now up to 3,400,000 #HEX holders and the mass airdrop is still ongoing. This move shouts "take a look at Hex right now!" Yet the chart currently looks awful, so why? I'm guessing there are imminent plans to pump the hell out of it while all of these fresh eyes have it at the forefront of their minds 🚀
English
0
0
6
109
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
Yayy I got my free #HEX and they are still flying out from 0x6357d3843D715496257e338a878Ab0B72040A918
Xultation tweet media
English
0
0
1
31
CryptoCoffee.pls
CryptoCoffee.pls@CryptoCoffee369·
This is a post for the coool kids Only the cool kids can reply
CryptoCoffee.pls tweet media
English
106
72
587
8K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@HexStinna Liquidity providers will move positions out of #PulseX to find more profitable options. Thinner liquidity = much easier to pump the eco
English
0
0
0
147
Stinna
Stinna@HexStinna·
$INC inflation has been reduced by 99%, what are your thoughts on this?
English
15
5
86
7.7K
yourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙
yourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙@yourfriendSOMMI·
❤️💛💚💙 On-chain Censorship is SERIOUS. ⚠️ Tether and Circle have banned $3.2 BILLION DOLLARS of Crypto Funds. ⛔️ USDT and USDC both have Admin Key Blacklist Functions. What if there was a better way? PulseChain might have a solution to this.
yourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙 tweet mediayourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙 tweet mediayourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙 tweet mediayourfriendSOMMI ❤️💛💚💙 tweet media
English
5
21
158
3K
BRUMANA🙏
BRUMANA🙏@jeffersonbruman·
The world needs a decentralized stablecoin - without admin keys , no freeze functions The world needs $pDAI on PulseChain
BRUMANA🙏 tweet media
ZachXBT@zachxbt

@circle @FastCompany Circle unfroze the USDC for the Goated hot wallet a few minutes ago. I expect more hot wallets to be unfrozen soon. The crypto community needs answers from @jerallaire @circle about why this overreach ever occurred to begin with.

English
5
13
95
2.2K
BRUMANA🙏
BRUMANA🙏@jeffersonbruman·
No one can stop decentralized $pDAI on PulseChain
BRUMANA🙏 tweet media
English
4
10
100
1.1K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@ChartNerdTA There is a clear loop hole. Create tokenized Treasury Bond Funds that create a separate investment product (e.g. tokenized shares in a Treasury bill fund or money-market-like vehicle) that holds US Treasuries and distributes yield.
English
0
0
2
246
🇬🇧 ChartNerd 📊
🇬🇧 ChartNerd 📊@ChartNerdTA·
🚨 UPDATE! #CLARITY: Details have emerged about the latest "Legislative Text" for a compromise on "Stablecoin Yield and Rewards" — The proposal would "Prohibit Platforms" from offering yield "Directly or Indirectly" for holding a Stablecoin or manner resembling a Bank Deposit 🏦
🇬🇧 ChartNerd 📊 tweet media
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett

🚨NEW: New details are emerging about the latest legislative text outlining a compromise on stablecoin yield and rewards, along with early reactions from crypto industry leaders who reviewed it today. According to an internal stakeholder email shared with me, the proposal would prohibit platforms from offering yield “directly or indirectly” for holding a stablecoin or in a manner that resembles a bank deposit. The restriction would apply broadly to digital asset service providers (exchanges, brokers, etc.) and their affiliates to limit workarounds, and would bar anything “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest. The proposal would also permit activity-based rewards tied to user activity, including loyalty, promotional, or subscription programs, provided they are not deemed economically or functionally equivalent to interest. It would also direct the @SECGov, @CFTC, and @USTreasury to jointly define permissible rewards and establish anti-evasion rules within one year. One industry leader who reviewed the text today tells me the draft is a “departure” from what had been previously discussed with the White House, warning the “economic equivalence” standard is vague and could be interpreted more restrictively by future regulators. They also point to limits on tying rewards to balances or transaction amounts, which could make incentives difficult to structure. “Overall, this is a more narrow and restrictive approach toward crypto,” they said. Another says the text is “largely in line with expectations” and reflects a balanced outcome, preserving transaction-based incentives while making clear stablecoins cannot function like interest-bearing deposit accounts. “This is the best possible result,” they said, noting that the text is broader than the initial Tillis-Alsobrooks proposal, which would have been more restrictive on crypto. Up next: Bank reps are set to review the text tomorrow.

English
18
91
510
47.1K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@Cointelegraph There is a clear loop hole. Create tokenized Treasury Bond Funds that create a separate investment product (e.g. tokenized shares in a Treasury bill fund or money-market-like vehicle) that holds US Treasuries and distributes yield.
English
0
0
0
62
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🇺🇸 NOW: Latest proposal outlining stablecoin compromise would ban yield resembling bank deposits while permitting activity-based rewards, per Eleanor Terrett.
Cointelegraph tweet media
English
56
90
542
45.7K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@InvestWithD @EleanorTerrett @BankingGOP There is a clear loop hole. Create tokenized Treasury Bond Funds that create a separate investment product (e.g. tokenized shares in a Treasury bill fund or money-market-like vehicle) that holds US Treasuries and distributes yield.
English
0
0
2
98
Diana
Diana@InvestWithD·
🚨UPDATE: CLARITY Act Compromise Enters FINAL REVIEW — Crypto Leaders Meet Senate Banking Committee TODAY 🤯🔥 According to @EleanorTerrett reports, crypto industry leaders are MEETING with the @BankingGOP TODAY, while banking representatives are expected to review the same compromise text right TOMORROW. 👀 The actual legislative text is still being kept UNDER WRAPS — and even banking sources reportedly say: 🤐 “So far I don’t think anyone has a great sense of what is in it.” 👀 At the same time, one thing is reportedly almost certain: 👉 a BAN on YIELD on idle balances 👉 TIGHTER limits on rewards that look like bank deposit products 😵 That lines up with @SenLummis already warning: “Anything that sounds like banking product terminology will not appear.” 🤯 More to come. I’ll keep updating.
Diana tweet mediaDiana tweet media
Diana@InvestWithD

🚨UPDATE: Senators Reach “AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE” on CLARITY Act Yield Fight 🤯🇺🇸 According to @Politico reports, KEY SENATORS and White House officials have now REACHED an “agreement in principle” on the stablecoin yield / rewards issue that has been one of the BIGGEST obstacles holding up the CLARITY Act in the Senate. 👀 The agreement reportedly involves Sen. Thom Tillis and Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, and is aimed at resolving the clash between banks and crypto firms over stablecoin rewards. 😵 “Sen. Tillis and I do have an agreement in principle.” 🚀 @Politico also reports the new language would seek to bar yield payments on passive stablecoin balances, though the full details are STILL NOT PUBLIC. 🤯 More to come.

English
14
211
901
99.5K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@EleanorTerrett There is a clear loop hole. Create tokenized Treasury Bond Funds that create a separate investment product (e.g. tokenized shares in a Treasury bill fund or money-market-like vehicle) that holds US Treasuries and distributes yield.
English
2
0
0
618
Eleanor Terrett
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett·
🚨NEW: New details are emerging about the latest legislative text outlining a compromise on stablecoin yield and rewards, along with early reactions from crypto industry leaders who reviewed it today. According to an internal stakeholder email shared with me, the proposal would prohibit platforms from offering yield “directly or indirectly” for holding a stablecoin or in a manner that resembles a bank deposit. The restriction would apply broadly to digital asset service providers (exchanges, brokers, etc.) and their affiliates to limit workarounds, and would bar anything “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest. The proposal would also permit activity-based rewards tied to user activity, including loyalty, promotional, or subscription programs, provided they are not deemed economically or functionally equivalent to interest. It would also direct the @SECGov, @CFTC, and @USTreasury to jointly define permissible rewards and establish anti-evasion rules within one year. One industry leader who reviewed the text today tells me the draft is a “departure” from what had been previously discussed with the White House, warning the “economic equivalence” standard is vague and could be interpreted more restrictively by future regulators. They also point to limits on tying rewards to balances or transaction amounts, which could make incentives difficult to structure. “Overall, this is a more narrow and restrictive approach toward crypto,” they said. Another says the text is “largely in line with expectations” and reflects a balanced outcome, preserving transaction-based incentives while making clear stablecoins cannot function like interest-bearing deposit accounts. “This is the best possible result,” they said, noting that the text is broader than the initial Tillis-Alsobrooks proposal, which would have been more restrictive on crypto. Up next: Bank reps are set to review the text tomorrow.
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett

🚨🗞️NEW: Crypto and Bank Reps Head to Capitol Hill to Review Stablecoin Deal as Details Remain Under Wraps Some crypto industry leaders will meet with @BankingGOP today, with banks set for tomorrow, to review the product of a long-awaited compromise. cryptoinamerica.com/p/crypto-and-b…

English
332
417
2.2K
594.1K
Xultation
Xultation@cryptoant13·
@BSCNews @CoinDesk There is a clear loop hole. Create tokenized Treasury Bond Funds that create a separate investment product (e.g. tokenized shares in a Treasury bill fund or money-market-like vehicle) that holds US Treasuries and distributes yield.
English
0
0
3
213
BSCN
BSCN@BSCNews·
🚨JUST IN: CLARITY ACT DRAFT BARS STABLECOIN YIELD ON BALANCES A revised draft of the Clarity Act has been revealed. The proposal bans yield for simply holding stablecoins, according to @CoinDesk. Rewards tied to balances would not be allowed. Lawmakers aim to avoid similarities with bank deposits. The move reflects pressure from the banking sector. Debate around stablecoin utility is intensifying. Activity-based rewards may still be permitted. However, the framework remains unclear on implementation.
English
46
46
249
51.1K