Cryptojelay
188 posts
@cryptojelay
Accept risk and making growth
Introducing the Open Gas Initiative - a way for protocols to subsidize gas for users, zero-code, for a seamless, frictionless onchain experience. With OG cohort: @eigencloud, @ether_fi, @pendle_fi, @Velvet_Capital. 👇
This has been dismissed
@PrimordialAA commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… This report says “direct capital flow” + “transferring money” “cross chain between wallets”. This is a false accusation as no funds were EVER transferred between these wallets. My account has never transferred funds from one address to another. I am trying my best to prove this to you. All of the BNB Chain to Metis receive address are “0xc1076fb1e15214e7e71792166c0543a345b4d933”. When you look into this address in DeBank, it has NEVER received or transferred any funds between any wallets. Whatever approval contract used has now marked all these wallets as sybil falsely. Digging deeper, you can clearly see all transactions on this list were on different days/times and have no sort of relation. I urge you to do some deeper digging into this whole report and even use Nansen AI if you have time to check for patterns/funding info of all these wallets. I am very confident none of these wallets are sybils and would even put up a 0.5E bounty to prove they aren’t. This contract has done nothing other than Netswap approvals for multiple months on Metis chain. This is why I say my best guess is that it was a temporary approval contract/router (most likely Netswap). This also creates a completely false premise for the report because remember they stated “transferring money” plus “direct capital flow” and not a penny was transferred to the receive wallets. This should be sufficient enough evidence for at least the “Metis to BNB Chain” section. There is nothing conclusive and I strongly believe if you do some digging will be aware this is not sybil activity.
