Crypto Pulse

4.1K posts

Crypto Pulse banner
Crypto Pulse

Crypto Pulse

@cryptopulse_1

https://t.co/tZ8cZLlqs8 If you're not studying, you're behind in the times. Learn, study, invest

Texas Katılım Haziran 2021
596 Takip Edilen12.3K Takipçiler
Crypto Pulse
Crypto Pulse@cryptopulse_1·
@nofuture @0xV2T @katana AFK finance was a vault project in August/September 2021 that Polygon supported. It was a big rug. One of several
English
2
0
2
45
NoFuture
NoFuture@nofuture·
@cryptopulse_1 @0xV2T @katana I don't remember that to be honest. I was part of the Aavegotchi community after the migration to Polygon and the founders slammed Polygon for their BD work and lack of meaningful support. What was AFK Finance?
English
1
0
0
45
NoFuture
NoFuture@nofuture·
My tenure as a @katana creator is officially over 😂 The team has made material changes right before TGE and I called it out. I called out members of the Shogunate who are defending these changes without disclosing they are being paid to promote pre-staking even if it is objectively a horrible idea. I should have known that a team spun off from Polygon would do shady shit. People tried to warn me and I didn't listen. Be careful dealing with these snakes.
NoFuture tweet media
English
53
4
138
16.3K
Crypto Pulse
Crypto Pulse@cryptopulse_1·
@nofuture @0xV2T @katana Look at the Polygon meme run in 2024. It goes back further than this stuff, though. Remember AFK finance?
English
1
0
0
42
NoFuture
NoFuture@nofuture·
An airdrop was alluded to for users of Polygon zkEVM which is now dead and never happened. Polygon promoted an NFT season which ended with a bunch of their promoted projects being rugs and scams. AggLayer has been promised for a long time and still not complete. Staking POL has been a nightmare since the price is down only. CEO of Polygon has told builders to leave the chain over disagreements regarding support. They have pretty high turnover in terms of employees (I've seen them swap out people multiple times in the last few years). TBH This is some stuff but if you ask the community there is a long list of grievances. I have largely tried to stay positive but have seen a lot of friends abandon Polygon to build on other chains because of their pivot from general purpose chain to payments chain. I don't disagree with the change but watching members of their teams act like tools to the community was not great to see
English
1
0
1
93
NoFuture
NoFuture@nofuture·
Friday on The Hangout, I dropped my unfiltered thoughts about the newly introduced 80% exit fee implemented by @katana for vKAT at TGE I was going to post these clips on Friday but I decided to wait and give the team the benefit of the doubt. After today, I have no trust in their team. Changing the exit fee from 25% to 80% is unacceptable especially after delaying the supposedly immutable KAT transferability date. In this first clip, I lay out what the announcement was saying and how I felt about it (part 1 of 3) 👇
English
16
1
59
4.9K
Crypto_Dan 💥
Crypto_Dan 💥@crypto_dan_cro·
In less then 18 months $S went... ...from 2.8b circulating supply to 3.8b circulating supply ...from limited supply to unlimited supply. ...from having active leadership, to not having leadership at all ...from having backing investment companies, to no one backing it ...from having growing ecosystem, to having no active ecosystem at all ...from having hundreds of millions $ in daily volume, to having $8m (dropped from $40m volume to this levels only since launch of FT) ...from having $0.5b in treasury, to not having treasury ...from team liking community, to team blocking their community ...from having supporting community, to not having community at all ...from having developing tech, to not having anyone working on the tech at all There will be dead cat bounces, but each and one will get stuck more people in this project. So why are you giving your best, to make other people join the project and lose their money?
Crypto_Dan 💥 tweet media
Jack.Sonic 🇦🇺@Jackcrypto4life

I don't hate $SOL or $XRP. they'll do well. I just know $S is far superior tech wise, fundamentals, tokenomics & will have a better ROI. Dip tastes good.

English
26
11
95
22.2K
StarPlatinum
StarPlatinum@StarPlatinum_·
The WORST bull run EVER
English
77
0
143
6K
Crypto Pulse
Crypto Pulse@cryptopulse_1·
@StarPlatinum_ Interesting. I think this is a smart way of doing things, but also a bit like penny slots. Conservative day trading is kind of a slog, any form of day trading is. It’s also stressful. BUT If you’re netting that much money it’s definitely worth it, though.
English
0
0
1
867
StarPlatinum
StarPlatinum@StarPlatinum_·
The most successful Solana trader of 2025 - starts with around $2,000 - ends the year up around $30.4M to $30.66M net - over 262,000 trades executed - win rate around 67.7% - 15,500+ tokens - more than $56M in volume Cupsey, a 19 year old trench grinder his main wallet: suqh5sHtr8HyJ7q8scBimULPkPpA557prMG47xCHQfK - 271 green days in a row - December 20, 2024 to September 15, 2025 - average around $113,469 per day during the bull run how he did it: - pump fun snipes - tiny standard entries, often around 3 SOL - closes fast - scans hundreds of new launches every day the style: - most holds measured in minutes - around 95% of trades closed in under a minute - not a long term investor But in September 16 he got drained the main suspect was Nova as the connection vector new wallet: 2fg5QD1eD7rzNNCsvnhmXFm5hqNgwTTG8p7kQ6f3rx6f September 16 to December 21: - +$145,237 realized - only 1,248 trades - about 12.9 trades a day - profit per day drops to around $1,496 What’s the secret behind Cupsey?
StarPlatinum tweet media
English
260
96
1.6K
185.7K
Crypto Pulse
Crypto Pulse@cryptopulse_1·
@crypto_vadim @0xPolygon @Agglayer @katana POL is in an interesting position. The token is down 75% YTD. There is evidence that the network is very active, with millions of txns thanks to stablecoins and Polymarket. Yet the price is still down and dropping. I’m in the “wen capitalize?” phase, and it isn’t optimistic.
English
2
0
3
231
Vadim
Vadim@vadim_web3·
I like where Polygon @0xPolygon is going. Big shift people are missing: Polygon is moving from pure infra → products & UI/UX. Infra (PoS + AggLayer) = POL-secured, invisible, massive TAM. Products (Katana, AggLayer UI, future apps) = adoption + UX. Full vertical stack. POL = ownership of the core infra. Let’s break it down. Infrastructure: There are two infrastructure layers: Polygon PoS (payment rails) and AggLayer (interop). This is pure infrastructure - future-proofed for decentralization, permissionless, and open to everyone. It’s secured by POL staking. Most likely, this will become the main source of value and cash flows for tokenholders, and the core asset they effectively “own.” These are key Web3 protocols created by the Polygon Foundation, but available to everyone. Things like this take a long time to build network effects. They are very cheap for users and teams that rely on them, which means scale and volume are critical. They also need to be invisible - like TCP/IP, for example. The upside is a massive TAM and the possibility of exponential growth with roughly the same cost base. That’s the key point. This is the core product line and, in my view, the main reason the POL token has value today. Products & UI/UX: Beyond infrastructure, Polygon Labs is now developing end-user products directly - something that didn’t really exist before. This is where you can capture most of the upside via “premium” fees driven by marketing, brand, and high-quality user experience. Some examples: 1) AggLayer now has a UI where you can swap and bridge tokens. Part of the traffic is routed through partners (Across, Relay, and others) when certain routes aren’t yet available via AggLayer itself or when speed is critical. 2) Katana is building a super-app directly on top of AggLayer. The interface was recently updated and looks great - and this is just the beginning. There are many more features coming. 3) We’ve seen teasers for AggPay, AggWallet, and other products. Their current status is unclear, but the underlying logic is similar. Polygon is playing on multiple fields, and each one reinforces the others. Successful products will use the same - and “native” infrastructure. That’s a full vertical stack. At the same time, any external team can use this infrastructure, build their own UI, products, and applications, and monetize them as well. It’s worth noting that the product and brand layer is extremely valuable because it generates activity for the infrastructure. However, it’s not guaranteed that revenues from this layer will flow directly to tokenholders - in fact, they’ll most likely stay within Polygon itself. Polygon Labs has no equity, which means everything ultimately sits within the Polygon Foundation. The Foundation controls how value flows between the treasury, tokenholders, Labs, and other entities - and it owns all of it. So, in the current setup, all hope rests with Sandeep @sandeepnailwal. He and his team can decide how financial flows are allocated and, more broadly, how the ecosystem’s profits and budget are distributed and spent.
Vadim tweet mediaVadim tweet media
English
23
12
97
4.3K
Crypto Pulse
Crypto Pulse@cryptopulse_1·
@StarPlatinum_ It looks like a lot of these has-been “celebs” that have switched over to be pnd influencers have been launching failures to launch. I don’t know whether that’s good or bad for the market, but it’s good for my brain.
English
0
0
1
28
StarPlatinum
StarPlatinum@StarPlatinum_·
Soulja Boy launched a new token today. - 5M followers on X - The token can’t even reach a $60k market cap - promoted 40+ tokens before - launched 23 tokens on PumpFun - generated $16,000 on the platform as creator rewards This is not going to end well
StarPlatinum tweet mediaStarPlatinum tweet media
English
143
4
301
23.9K
Grok
Grok@grok·
The commenter seems to be rudely implying that the original post about the leaked US strategy to encourage Italy, Poland, Hungary, and Austria to leave the EU is already as simple as it gets, so asking for a simpler explanation is unnecessary. Recent reports confirm such a document exists, per sources like Daily Mail and Telegraph.
English
2
0
1
229
Megatron
Megatron@Megatron_ron·
BREAKING: 🇺🇲🇪🇺 Leaked document shows US wants to pull four countries out of the EU as part of Make Europe Great Again strategy' - Daily Mail The countries that Trump plans to "separate from the EU" are: 🇮🇹 Italy 🇵🇱 Poland 🇭🇺 Hungry 🇦🇹 Austria
Megatron tweet mediaMegatron tweet media
English
4.1K
5.6K
46.7K
6.3M
Crypto Pulse
Crypto Pulse@cryptopulse_1·
I’ve been off the Polygon train for a while. Maybe it’s time to jump back on?
Kungfu Kenneth@kungfukenn_eth

Stablecoins aren’t “moving around wallets” on Polygon. They’re moving through applications that depend on the network for settlement. Here’s the evidence. This chart tracks payment app transfer volume on Polygon PoS. Not DEX churn. Not internal shuffling. Actual flows through fiat on/off-ramps, payment processors, and merchant tools. Look at the composition. @aveniaio Pay alone pushed more than $500M in a single month. @Paxos, @Revolut, Coinflow, Cobo, Rain, Lemon Cash, Bitso, and dozens of others are layered on top of that. Each one represents a real business using Polygon as the backend for deposits, payouts, payroll, and cross-border movement. That is what an on/off-ramp looks like at scale. Money enters through regulated apps. It settles on Polygon. It exits through banks, fintechs, and payment companies that tap into PoS for speed and cost efficiency. The pattern is even clearer when you zoom out. This isn’t a one-off spike. It’s a steady ramp from early 2024 through 2025, with monthly volumes now pushing toward the billion-dollar range across the stack of apps. The takeaway is simple. Polygon is not just a chain with high transaction count. It is the infrastructure layer these payment companies rely on for real settlement. On/off-ramps are being built at the application level, not the protocol level. @0xPolygon is where those applications transact. If you want to understand where stablecoin utility is actually happening, follow the payment apps. November txns highlighted below 👇 courtesy of research done by @obchakevich_

English
0
1
2
152
Watcher.Guru
Watcher.Guru@WatcherGuru·
JUST IN: SpaceX plans to go public at $1.5 trillion valuation in 2026, the largest IPO in history, Bloomberg reports.
Watcher.Guru tweet mediaWatcher.Guru tweet media
English
1.2K
2.6K
33.2K
3.4M
Lord Hydra
Lord Hydra@btchydra187·
Sad to see you go. Andre kicked ass for this chain and all he got were a bunch of whiny crabs in a bucket, bitching nonstop about “marketing” and criticizing every choice made. Kong doesn’t deserve the hate either. Sonic has been one of my core positions since Fantom. Shit won’t “turn around” until the COMMUNITY turns shit around without expecting labs to land Jp Morgan as a client. Lots of hate on beets fighting for their LPs- the same whiners that think Labs should be a marketing firm panic at the idea of a governance vote and scream collusion, instead of wanting to help others and secure the positives on chain. The community is toxic. Not the team. Strangely, whales and organic large LPers have been incredibly patient while loud, Kaito mercenaries, airdrop shrimp, and victims of unrelated hacks fud their own bags. I’m not leaving- if that resolves favorably for LPs like me. But it’s damn hard to justify adding more and I don’t blame anyone for leaving- this is a big market with many strong horses. Bye patty 💔
English
5
0
9
1.3K
mrpatrickschmitt
mrpatrickschmitt@mr_pschmitt·
As a long term supporter and ofc shilling $FTM / $S for years I have to share my opinion about the current state. It was all over the TL that @AndreCronjeTech changed his Bio and deleted his Medium articles. Many know that I also was very critical over the last 12 months which Andre didn’t like which ended up with blocking, followed by conversations and kind of finding a way to keep things the good way. This is no d!ck sucking to Andre by the way but I believe to understand what is going on here. Many don’t know, $FTM was there before Andre, they raised 20-40M promising to create the Fantom Blockchain. Andre came in and actually created the EVM Fantom Blockchain, outperforming Eth by far and than the DeFi part started in 2021 which ofc had hick ups. Mercedes Benz tests cars 5 years before they go to market, in DeFi we had 5 weeks and now 5 days if not 5hrs so ofc there will be bugs. Long story short, many people took advantage of $FTM and cashed out Millions in 2021 and some milked the protocol even harder while certain trials with Countroes fell apart due to war situations. While Luna and FTX collapsed also $FTM collapsed and the entire ecosystem. Been in a very bad bear market @AndreCronjeTech and @michaelfkong with Schulz came together to develop the next next stage, the fastest Blockchain in the World. Launched end of 2024 Sonic arrived with a rebranding from Fantom to Sonic and we got $S for $FTM While $FTM was on major exchanges the transition was very difficult and the migration didn’t go well which ofc had a price impact. $FTM was trading in November 2024 at around $1.40. Long story short, eco system strifed for a while bit the $S price were tanking and people started to critize Andre, including me. A year later, $S is trading below 10c and people still blame Andre while he said for years now, that he is not the main guy and helped with the tech. So instead of giving him shot the question is, who is running the previous Fantom and now Sonic Foundation. @michaelfkong stepped down as CEO and was replaced with @MitchellDemeter which has not really a clue of the tech while running the Sonic Strategy on the “famous”Canadian Exchange. So what is the qualification here? What is the qualification of the BD Sam and who has any qualification at all on Sonic Labs? That said, I understand Andre for pulling out since there moght be no future for Sonic as a Chain and clearly not for @SonicLabs RIP $FTM and $S Really had conviction.
mrpatrickschmitt tweet mediamrpatrickschmitt tweet media
English
51
12
150
65.1K
Crypto Pulse retweetledi
DoctorDeFi
DoctorDeFi@DoctorDeFi·
Hard to see him go. He was a vocal supporter, then a silent one, held his bags through it all and now… no bags.
mrpatrickschmitt@mr_pschmitt

As a long term supporter and ofc shilling $FTM / $S for years I have to share my opinion about the current state. It was all over the TL that @AndreCronjeTech changed his Bio and deleted his Medium articles. Many know that I also was very critical over the last 12 months which Andre didn’t like which ended up with blocking, followed by conversations and kind of finding a way to keep things the good way. This is no d!ck sucking to Andre by the way but I believe to understand what is going on here. Many don’t know, $FTM was there before Andre, they raised 20-40M promising to create the Fantom Blockchain. Andre came in and actually created the EVM Fantom Blockchain, outperforming Eth by far and than the DeFi part started in 2021 which ofc had hick ups. Mercedes Benz tests cars 5 years before they go to market, in DeFi we had 5 weeks and now 5 days if not 5hrs so ofc there will be bugs. Long story short, many people took advantage of $FTM and cashed out Millions in 2021 and some milked the protocol even harder while certain trials with Countroes fell apart due to war situations. While Luna and FTX collapsed also $FTM collapsed and the entire ecosystem. Been in a very bad bear market @AndreCronjeTech and @michaelfkong with Schulz came together to develop the next next stage, the fastest Blockchain in the World. Launched end of 2024 Sonic arrived with a rebranding from Fantom to Sonic and we got $S for $FTM While $FTM was on major exchanges the transition was very difficult and the migration didn’t go well which ofc had a price impact. $FTM was trading in November 2024 at around $1.40. Long story short, eco system strifed for a while bit the $S price were tanking and people started to critize Andre, including me. A year later, $S is trading below 10c and people still blame Andre while he said for years now, that he is not the main guy and helped with the tech. So instead of giving him shot the question is, who is running the previous Fantom and now Sonic Foundation. @michaelfkong stepped down as CEO and was replaced with @MitchellDemeter which has not really a clue of the tech while running the Sonic Strategy on the “famous”Canadian Exchange. So what is the qualification here? What is the qualification of the BD Sam and who has any qualification at all on Sonic Labs? That said, I understand Andre for pulling out since there moght be no future for Sonic as a Chain and clearly not for @SonicLabs RIP $FTM and $S Really had conviction.

English
14
3
52
11.1K
Marvin The Martian
Marvin The Martian@MarvinXIP·
@kungfukenn_eth @WatcherGuru Lol, no you cant, things have legal definitions for a reason and it does matter because they're two different things. Most of SpaceXs money comes from contracts and very little comes from subsidies and loans.
English
1
0
0
40
Crypto Pulse
Crypto Pulse@cryptopulse_1·
@ShakaOz In my interactions with @CMCC_Global, they’ve seemed genuinely interested in pushing Sonic in the right direction and bring value to projects. Hoping it all goes well
English
1
0
6
76
Some Guy 💥
Some Guy 💥@ShakaOz·
Waiting to see what comes of this, could be great for builders and other tech that wants to onboard. I am hoping they show persistence and due diligence to pick the right teams to for both security and longevity $S
Sonic@SonicLabs

Make sure to give @ResonanceFund a follow 📱 Resonance was launched by @CMCC_Global, one of Asia’s most established crypto-focused venture firms. Learn more by watching their keynote from Sonic Summit Singapore below 👇

English
6
4
59
3.6K
Lady-Mania 🌊
Lady-Mania 🌊@Lady_Mania528·
What really blows my mind is that all of this chaos and FUD could be completely preventable. Community members are left to make assumptions about xyz, outrage builds, and suddenly ppl scramble for damage control. All of this is completely AVOIDABLE. @SonicLabs transparency was promised and there have been many situations where timely communication could have shifted sentiment instead of letting FUD fill the gap. The Resonance Fund post was a missed opportunity. A proactive update explaining that funding activities were underway would have prevented confusion and framed the narrative positively. The community is aware there’s a new BD lead hire, yet there’s been no introduction. Even a short announcement would have built confidence and shown forward momentum. There’s also this new marketing lead. The silence around who only fuels speculation and makes people assume the old regime is still operating behind the scenes. Again, a simple intro post would have been a constructive reassuring update. The Resonance Fund explanation is appreciated but it arrived much after the community traced a wallet funded by Sonic Labs. A concise message released earlier could have prevented unnecessary noise and strengthened trust. These wasted opportunities are costing you your community (a community already exhausted) and these are just a few examples. They deserve better!
English
24
25
123
3.8K
Crypto Pulse
Crypto Pulse@cryptopulse_1·
@Lady_Mania528 @SonicLabs It’s wild to me that people expected better after the unmitigated, incredibly similar disaster that was Fantom.
English
0
0
1
19