Ris retweetledi
Ris
4.9K posts
Ris retweetledi
Belda IMB ngehajar turis Rusia yg ngelecehin perempuan 🔥🔥
E X X ➠A L E R T S@ExxAlerts
NEW: MMA trainer chokes out Russian tourist in a headlock who was allegedly touching local girls inappropriately. Belda Brig Sando, who is a Balinese Fighter and gym owner, is seen putting a Russian tourist in a headlock and choking him until he passes out. Sando claims the man was drunk, touching people, walking in the middle of the road, and even slapping people on the head. Sando said on his Instagram post of the video, “I’m tired of seeing some foreigners come here and act without respect.” 📹belda_brig_sando | IG
Indonesia
Ris retweetledi
Indonesia has a stupid, treacherous and despicable leadership for agreeing to partake in the Gaza Holocaust for a phonecall from Eric Trump. Disgusting
Dimitri Lascaris@dimitrilascaris
I’m guessing that Indonesia won’t be contributing troops to the Gaza ‘stabilization force’.
English
@cryptorisman Kak kalo tampilannya begini mending tunggu atau refresh ya?
Indonesia
@cryptorisman @Charlestommy18 Berarti sebagian orang ada yg udh berhasil dftr? Sedih bgt drtd begini
Indonesia
Ada yg ikut nge war upacara 17 Agustus di istana negara ngga ya? Open nya besok guys tgl 4, pantengin yuk di web ini pandang.istanapresiden.go.id
Indonesia
@lastvender_ @Charlestommy18 Biasanya ini udah d buka tapi cuma allowed IP aja, which is oral lagi pada registration..
Indonesia
Say it louder for those in the back: zero‑knowledge proofs are the solution!
Traditional KYC laws create risky data honeypots and massive costs.
@punk6052 breaks down why KYC is broken and how ZKPs can fix it.
CoinGape@CoinGapeMedia
#BrandTalk Opinion Alert🗣️ Aztec General Counsel Andre Omietanski (@punk6052) Writes on the Solution to rampant Data Security Breaches!⤵️ @aztecnetwork @Zac_Aztec coingape.com/brandtalk/opin…
English
Follow Fridays
- founders
@jaosef, @Zac_Aztec
- marketing
@clairekart, @kelsey0x, @0xdavid, @jschxyz
product
- @savio_sou, @0xrafi, @Amin_3X, @omw_to_the_moon
BD
- @stakedeve, @Hazbobo1
devrel
- @critesjosh_ , @cryptobuilder_, @zkpedrongmi
general counselor
- @punk6052
opperations
- @lisacuesta
English
Friendly reminder that you can just build things.
Private Bill Splitting
Private Auctions
Private Stablecoins
Private Betting
Private Glassdoor
Private Yelp
Private Fog of War gaming
Private on-chain card shuffling
Private Voting Systems
Private NFTs
Private Voting Systems
Get started building on Aztec Testnet: aztec.network/developers
English
@aztecnetwork lol @nillion needs their community to wear blindfolds because if they got to see the tech at @aztecnetwork they would abandon the "army" and come running over here
Aztec puts Privacy first
English
@MichelMaria671 @anoma It’s about aligning actors, assets, and intents across domains. The chain is just the foundation.
English
@cryptorisman @anoma I think it is not chain, it is a solution for Coordination
English
Is Anoma capable of truly mitigating these risks, solver manipulation, hidden liquidity, failed execution?
Let’s hear from the @anoma team!!
Ris@cryptorisman
Everyone’s praising @anoma for making intent-based trading seamless. Set your logic, stay private, and let solvers do the work. Say you want to swap 10 SOL for 0.1 BTC, privately, at a fair rate. It sounds effortless. You don’t choose the DEX, worry about slippage, or pick a counterparty. But behind that simplicity, there’s a hidden layer of complexity, and risk. Anoma solver network is the backbone of intent execution, but it’s also a new trust layer. Solvers compete to match intents, yet they control how and when those trades happen. A malicious solver could delay execution just long enough to benefit from price movement, all while staying inside your rules. The logic is respected, but your outcome still suffers.
English
@cryptorisman @anoma Great point 🧐 Intent trading feels like magic but trusting solvers is key we need strong incentives and checks so they work for users not against them ✨ #Anoma
English
Everyone’s praising @anoma for making intent-based trading seamless.
Set your logic, stay private, and let solvers do the work. Say you want to swap 10 SOL for 0.1 BTC, privately, at a fair rate. It sounds effortless.
You don’t choose the DEX, worry about slippage, or pick a counterparty. But behind that simplicity, there’s a hidden layer of complexity, and risk.
Anoma solver network is the backbone of intent execution, but it’s also a new trust layer. Solvers compete to match intents, yet they control how and when those trades happen.
A malicious solver could delay execution just long enough to benefit from price movement, all while staying inside your rules. The logic is respected, but your outcome still suffers.
English
Anoma doesn’t just ask what you want to trade, it asks how, when, where, with whom, and under what terms. That’s power. But power always comes with tradeoffs!!
Ris@cryptorisman
Everyone’s praising @anoma for making intent-based trading seamless. Set your logic, stay private, and let solvers do the work. Say you want to swap 10 SOL for 0.1 BTC, privately, at a fair rate. It sounds effortless. You don’t choose the DEX, worry about slippage, or pick a counterparty. But behind that simplicity, there’s a hidden layer of complexity, and risk. Anoma solver network is the backbone of intent execution, but it’s also a new trust layer. Solvers compete to match intents, yet they control how and when those trades happen. A malicious solver could delay execution just long enough to benefit from price movement, all while staying inside your rules. The logic is respected, but your outcome still suffers.
English
English
@jogi_kenedi @anoma Closer to MEV searchers, but with constraints. They don’t just race for profit, they have to honor the intent’s logic.
English
English
Intent-based markets are powerful, but they shift trust, expose new attack surfaces, and introduce subtle trade-offs.
So the real question is:
Is Anoma capable of truly mitigating these risks, solver manipulation, hidden liquidity, failed execution?
Let’s hear from the @anoma team!!
English
Then there’s privacy. While shielding trade data protects you from front-running and liquidation games, it also obscures price signals. If too many intents stay private, liquidity becomes invisible.
Price discovery breaks down. And if your constraints are too strict, like only matching with “trusted” parties. You might never find a match at all. The system stays secure, but you walk away with nothing.
English