Sarven Capadisli

Published "Linked Research on the Decentralised Web": csarven.ca/linked-researc…

@w3c @studio24 curl -i w3.org/Consortium/fac… HTTP/2 200 content-location: facts.html facts (resource URI). facts.html (representation URL) Changing Consortium/facts.html (awkward) to about/facts goes counter to above, Cool URIs, persistence. Is the URL Strategy available as a URI Template?

@bianca_oli_per This may spark some ideas useful to you: csarven.ca/dokieli-rww - the Cited By section near the top that's dynamically loaded ie. back references by checking the document's own inbox. It is briefly explained under Notifying Cited Entity in #semantic-citations" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">csarven.ca/linked-researc… and elsewhere.

Motivation "What type of thought emergence would happen if our sources knew they were cited and they could 'answer back'?" 3/

Last weekend I started a new @obsdmd experiment based on the following question: "Who says links need to be locked within a PKM?" In the good spirit of #KnowledgeGraph and inspired by @csarven's efforts on Linked Research, the experiment was set like this.. 🧵👇 1/

@lysander07 SW/LD research communication disagrees :)

Nice visual metaphor :) #linkeddata

@BobSiegerink @openscience I self-publish my own creations eg. csarven.ca/presentations/… I allocate the URIs for the resources.. information is human- and machine-readable, accessible, archivable.. ad tech / surveillance software free for my readers.. get to dogfood/demo the tech that I preach about.

What could possibly be the starting bid for the first Web page (and UDI): info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/…

@azra_vi :) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_of_…

37 minutes in, dude tells the woman of the year he wants to marry her

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan re textbook/market definition of OA, no need to preprints/self-publishing in the table. Out of scope. Self-publishing/preprints are open by default, provably more human/machine-accessible, and ethical than status quo OA publishing. Table should include accessibility/ethics? 4/

@csarven @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan Ah, interesting. Indeed in this table we thinking of external research funding organizations.

Am i fighting a losing battle to correct people whenever they define Gold OA = APC? should i even borther?

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan Perhaps clarify table caption "publishing open access: author choices". When authors are required to use for- or non-profit third-parties, it's not a "choice". Self-publishing puts creators at the centre of research communication. Everything else is repackaging/colours.. =) 3/

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan Partly why I suggested always/not-applicable given dependencies. Not sure how useful it's that a research funder expects/allows personal funding but not acknowledge? You should self-publish an article on this. Table doesn't cut it.. or need a pretty complicated legend :) 2/

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan Table may need more massaging. Impossible to tell if any options fulfills an external funders requirements w/o knowing the requirements. If table is about publications dependent on external funders requiring third-party systems, it says what qualifies as research contribution 1/

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan "Web" and/or "HTTP URI" works. HTTP URI is where authors have authority/ownership/jurisdiction on the identifier. Having privileges to allocate a URI to a resource. HTTP URI can resolve to a location (URL)... So, essentially anywhere the author may be able to on the Web.

@csarven @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan Would it be more understandable and still correct to, for the 'where', say: "web, using http URI" ?

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan I interpret funder requirement in context of funder value, which can vary. If the funder is same as author (or creator..), why would another (external) party's requirement matter? I think the value should either be 'always' or 'not applicable'.

@csarven @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan You mean the funder requirement? That will likely be based on their assessment of guarantees of quality control or any proxies of that.

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan However! Giving this a second look, for 'personal' funding, the requirements are 'always' fulfilled. I think this should be corrected in the table.

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan I assume cost 'free' is to free to the author, but not to whatever is keeping it up. fulfill funder req. is 'mostly not' because funders predominantly operate within an ecosystem that required authors to transfer control (identifiers, data, applications) to third-parties. 2/

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan HTTP URI for what's under one's authority and the possibility to give any resource of significance its own URI. Still possible to provide copies to libraries and archives. When? As desired. Don't need to ask permission to publish on the Web. It doesn't entail certification. 3/

@csarven @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan Thanks. Good point. Promised that years ago. Would look like this. Question is what is holding people from choosing self publishing, esp. compared to preprints. Community norms? Lack of knowledge/expertise? Or ...?

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan re self-publishing: baseline funding may be 'personal' but it doesn't exclude private (today) or a future where institutions provide the 'infrastructure' or ~$100/year (generous!) to share unlimited number of resources (articles, reviews, data..) 1/

@jeroenbosman @Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan twitter.com/csarven/status…

@Richvn @lisalibrarian @Bibliojo @aarontay @paigecmorgan This is an overview I like to use in which I now created a separate column for diamond. BTW, the UU fund mentioned here is something specific for our institution.

@LIBEReurope What information do you want to make universally identifiable, human and machine-readable?

@csarven @g3om4c Would you like it in a different format perhaps?

Our Linked Open Data Working Group has just released a new guide titled, 'Best Practices for Library Linked Open (LOD) Publication'. The group propose 6 Steps for Publishing LOD. Read the guide here: ow.ly/EZOB50DHhh9. #library #linkeddata #linkedopendata #opendata