DC

@Rawbertttttt @Truebitprotocol Nothing new. We see them constantly developing software. No news regarding $TRU. No news regarding #Truebit's implementation in any project.

I hate Truebit I hate Jason Twitch

@marryevan999 @fast2future Claude

My Wife asked why I was smiling at 4 AM. Showed her the terminal. "What are all those green numbers?" $1,129. Made while she slept. "Doing what?" Nothing. Claude scanned 14,000 wallets, found 47 that never lose, built a bot that copies them. She watched for 10 seconds: +$3.87 captured +$6.42 captured +$12.71 captured "It just keeps going?" Every few seconds. New line. New money. "How much did you start with?" $300. Now $1,429. Eleven hours. Asleep. "What does it do?" Buys at $0.48. Sells at $0.52. Pockets $0.04. Who wins doesn't matter. "That's legal?" Citadel does this on NYSE daily. 400 engineers. I have one screen. She looked at the P&L curve. Never dips. Just climbs. "Can you make me one?" Setting hers up now. She still doesn't get how it works. The bot doesn't care. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me @marryevan999 (so i can DM you)

@marryevan999 Guide

Chinese engineers wrote a Claude script that turned 1.18 into 3.3M on Polymarket Nobody tells you about them and you still think this is a person who places bets manually. Here I’ll disappoint you this is an automated script written by Chinese engineers. They called it PHANTOM X It is fully automated through Claude. Result: $1,18 → $3,300,000 37,063 trades. Win rate 71%. The biggest win: $180,000 on a single bet. I’m copying their trades here because the PRIORITY mode allows reacting to each of their actions as fast as possible, and I haven’t found any bot that can keep up. How it bots work: The bot simultaneously tracks thousands of sports markets on Polymarket and Kalshi, finds discrepancies between the platforms, and enters positions faster than any human could physically manage. Three strategies in one: -Pairs Trading the bot sees that YES on the Rockets costs $0.62, while NO on the same match is $0.41. The total = $1.03, not $1.00. That’s a 3% risk-free profit. The bot enters automatically within milliseconds. -Sentiment AI scans Twitter/X and news in real time. If a team’s coach suddenly gets injured and 50 accounts report it, the bot recalculates the probability within 2 seconds before the market factors it in. -Calendar + Volatility 15–20 minutes before the game starts, volatility spikes. The bot takes positions early and closes them after the first major price movement. Why sports is perfect? Sports O/U markets on Polymarket have clear paired contracts OVER and UNDER for a single game. They should total $1.00, but due to different reaction speeds of traders, deviations constantly occur. This is the most predictable type of arbitrage on the entire platform. Sovereign2013 built $3.3M precisely on this. Why a human wouldn’t do this? A human physically cannot monitor 50+ markets simultaneously, react in milliseconds, stay awake 24/7, avoid emotional responses after a losing streak, and simultaneously calculate Z-scores over 60 bars of data. The bot does all of this in parallel without breaks. By the time a human opens a tab, the arbitrage window has already closed. This is why, right now, you should start learning Claude and testing different methods. Manual trading is dying. The era of automation has arrived, and whoever masters it now will thank themselves in the future. If you’re interested in writing your own bot and automating it on Polymarket: 1. Comment the word 'GUIDE' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me @marryevan999 (so that I can message you) Within 24 hours, I will send you a full manual on how to write your own bot that can earn $3,200+ per month. One of my followers , after reading my article, wrote their own bot that is already showing results of $500 in 6 hours proof in the comments.

🌐 What is XDB CHAIN? It's a next-gen blockchain designed for brands, loyalty programs, and real-world assets. Think fast, low-fee, and scalable crypto infrastructure for everyday use

I hate Jason Twitch

@CoveTrader ccwcorp

🚨FREE Trend Tradingview indicator detects uptrend, downtrend and chop. You can change settings to adjust time frame. 👉Want this repost and subscribe to my channel @CoveTrader" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@CoveTrader ✅Drop your tradingview name in the comments so I can give you access, dm me it or come on my livestream and give me it there. 🚀I have more free indicators coming so make sure to follow! 🚨I am enjoying doing this if you want me to make one comment an idea and I can see what I can do. $spy $qqq $es $nq #futurestrading #indicators

@CossamKapi11915 Liquidity

FREE LIQUIDITY INDICATOR

@TheTrue_bitcoin Inside job I suspect

Truebit’s silence for more than seven weeks following the incident has seriously damaged trust within the community. Many token holders contributed significant capital to support the development of the protocol and its verification infrastructure. When an incident occurs and communication stops, it raises legitimate concerns about transparency and accountability. The issue is not speculation about motives. The issue is responsibility to the community that funded the system. At a minimum, the community deserves: a clear incident report an explanation of what failed a defined recovery or migration plan clarity on the current security model Without these answers, it becomes increasingly difficult for participants, node operators, and developers to maintain confidence in the platform. Trust in decentralized infrastructure depends on communication and transparency. After seven weeks of silence, the community is left asking whether that trust can be restored in Truebit team members and Jason Teutsch. IF WE CANNOT TRUST THE TRUEBIT TEAM, HOW DO WE TRUST THE PROJECT. How can participants confidently support future projects involving the same team if communication and accountability during critical moments remain unclear?

Truebit Verify Patent. The recent update showing a final rejection of the Truebit patent application raises serious questions for the verification ecosystem. For years, described TRU as the economic security layer protecting verification integrity. Yet the system now appears to be operating without that mechanism functioning as originally described. This creates an important discussion for the broader verifiable-computation community. If the architecture originally relied on a staking-based security model, and that model is no longer active, then the community deserves clarity about: how verification security is currently maintained whether the original architecture has changed what implementation path the platform now follows The patent office’s rejection does not mean the application cannot be amended or appealed. But it does reinforce the importance of careful technical and legal scrutiny of claims in this space. Developers working on verifiable computation, fraud proofs, and off-chain verification systems should continue documenting prior art and architectural approaches. Open discussion and transparent examination of these systems is healthy for the ecosystem. The goal should not be conflict. The goal should be clarity, transparency, and robust verification infrastructure that the entire Web3 ecosystem can trust. After these events and the unresolved questions around the security model, the community is left asking: can Truebit Verify still be trusted as originally described?

Open letter from tru.watch to @Truebitprotocol and @JasonTeutsch #Truebit tru.watch/community-stat…

@TrueCryptoPower Where is my tokens?

If you run a node for #Truebit, you can now update it to the latest version: 1.120.0-beta.274

@TrueCryptoPower Is anyone there to throw rotten eggs? Does he dare to appear live in public?

10th Workshop on Trusted Smart Contracts March 6th, 2026 Program Committee: Jason Teutsch #Truebit, USA Will a remedial program for $TRU be announced there? 😉🥲 ifca.ai/fc26/wtsc/cfp.…

@TrueCryptoPower @Richarddd102 Huh? Boom? Where are my tokens? Are they going to recover my losses?

More updates on devs.truebit 👀❕ Mainly API & Dynamic Oracles #what-is-dynamic-oracles" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">devs.truebit.io/developing-tru… Found by @Richarddd102 👏 #Truebit also work dynamically on software ⬇️

@Truebitprotocol I hate Truebit

Truebit is continuing to work with US law enforcement and external cybersecurity specialists to investigate the recent attack on the TRU smart contracts. Truebit’s new platform, Truebit Verify, has been in development over the last four years. The recent attack on the TRU smart contracts did not compromise Truebit Verify’s operation. TRU interfaces with Truebit Verify as a staking-based countermeasure intended to protect against Sybil attacks and faulty behavior. These protections remain in effect, including managing Node operator participation, auditable dispute resolution, and deregistration of identified faulty Nodes. Truebit Verify’s API tasks, Dynamic Oracles, and Verified Orchestration features also remain fully functional.

I hate Truebit

@TrueCryptoPower I hate Truebit

✍️Worth noting. A milestone in the development of #DAC.

@TrueCryptoPower I hate Truebit

Currently, version 1.120.0-beta.257 of the Truebit node software is in operation. The next version, 1.120.0-beta.262, is under development. 👀

@TrueCryptoPower @Truebitprotocol Fat hope

😐Today marks the monthly anniversary of the sad event that was the #Truebit hack. It would be nice to hear something from @Truebitprotocol 🙄

@TrueCryptoPower They are hiding

@csdwj Notice that in this tweet I wrote that by mid-March the TRU situation should be clarified. I didn’t say whether it would be resolved positively or negatively. The only thing I’m certain of is that by mid-March we will know more.

#DAC will launch around mid-March. By that time, everything should also be clarified regarding $TRU.