Kim D. Petersen

12.2K posts

Kim D. Petersen

Kim D. Petersen

@dabelstein

President of @DADAFOdk, Director, Information Technology & Acting CFO for @INNCOorg. Programmer/consultant/syadmin, *ix/linux expert. Proud Vaper+Father.

Nørrebrogade, Vejle Katılım Temmuz 2010
1.2K Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
The Last Fire
The Last Fire@theLastFiire·
@martinmbauer Look at the broader point. There are basically no new ideas, other than the same ideas being repeated again and again.
English
2
0
0
264
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@MichaelChristph @runegreyskull Flot flytten på målstregen.. Det er sikkert også derfor folk har problemer med visdomstænder... eller folks genetiske tendens til at få huller eller svage tænder.
Dansk
0
0
1
14
Rune Bulk
Rune Bulk@runegreyskull·
Du står med 15 milliarder, de må kun bruges på en af to ting, gratis tandlæge til alle i danmark eller at fjerne topskatten. hvad prioriterer du?
Dansk
42
2
17
8.3K
Kim D. Petersen retweetledi
Clive Bates
Clive Bates@Clive_Bates·
20 million people have died from smoking-related diseases in the EU since the 1992 EU snus prohibition. Imagine if the EU had encouraged switching to snus, incentivised pouch innovation, and gone all in to migrate nicotine use to low-risk products? EU still has 94m smokers, FFS.
Arielle Selya@ArielleSelya

Rethinking Nicotine: @KatMurti moderates a discussion on the failures of prohibition, with discussion by @Tim_Andrews @ReemAmirIbrahim @SofieHamilton comparing Swedens success in reducing smoking (with snus) vs how Australia's overly restrictive approach backfired.

English
2
34
64
2.4K
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@BurgessPark2 @SchneidGabriel @CColose I will only respond once, i'm going to bed - assume equal pressure - one version of Venus consists entirely of oxygen, the other of CO2. Are you claiming the surface temperature will be the same?
English
1
0
0
18
Burgess Park
Burgess Park@BurgessPark2·
@dabelstein @SchneidGabriel @CColose I read the thread perfectly Gabriel claimed "No link between atmospheric composition and temperature" You responded by asking "whats your explanation about Venus" I replied explaining that Venus was the result of pressure and not composition Whats your problem ?
English
1
0
0
27
Chris Colose
Chris Colose@CColose·
Of all the stupid skeptic arguments, those critiquing the greenhouse effect are among the worst. The physics applies to all sort of planetary and stellar atmosphere problems, e.g. white dwarf cooling rates used in star cluster age estimates. And yes, it’s fine to say “traps heat”
Chris Gloninger, CCM, CBM@ChrisGloninger

Jim, you just described the greenhouse effect while claiming to debunk it. Impressive.\ Yes, CO₂ absorbs infrared and re-emits it in all directions, including back toward Earth's surface. That downward re-emission is exactly what warms the planet. The word "trap" is shorthand for a process you just correctly described. Your own explanation is the mechanism. This is like arguing a wool blanket doesn't keep you warm because it doesn't "trap" heat - it just slows its escape in every direction including back at your body. "CO₂ re-emits in a millionth of a second" - correct. And then the O₂ and N₂ molecules that absorbed that energy via collision also re-emit. The atmosphere is dense. Photons don't escape to space on the first try. That's the entire point. "CO₂ is essential for cooling the Earth" - this is the only interesting part of your reply. CO₂ does radiate energy to space from the upper atmosphere. But as CO₂ increases, that emission layer rises to colder altitudes, which radiates less efficiently - net result: warming. This is radiative forcing 101. You didn't catch a half-truth. You described a physical process accurately, misread its implications, and called it a gotcha. The thermometers are not propagandists, Jim.

English
10
13
66
8.9K
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@BurgessPark2 @SchneidGabriel @CColose Lets see .... what were the two first pictograms you started your "response" to me with? And you apparently didn't read the thread... Hmmm ... misplaced condescension ... hmmm ... ah well, you might be right - sorry about that. /S
English
1
0
0
20
Burgess Park
Burgess Park@BurgessPark2·
@dabelstein @SchneidGabriel @CColose He said - 'No link between atmospheric composition and temperature" I agree, my explanation was about atmospheric PRESSURE and not compostion Instead of responding with misplaced condescension - perhaps think a little longer !
English
1
0
0
26
Burgess Park
Burgess Park@BurgessPark2·
@dabelstein @SchneidGabriel @CColose 😂🤣 In what way is "the atmosphere not a factor" in the greenhouse effect ? This sub thread is discussing CO2 absorption and you are ridiculously claiming its the cause of Venus temperature I am just correcting your nonsense (again)
English
1
0
0
43
Burgess Park
Burgess Park@BurgessPark2·
@dabelstein @SchneidGabriel @CColose Heat on Venus is mostly the result of high pressure The Gas Laws (PV=nRT) As gas is compressed its temp increases dramatically Because of its dense atmosphere, the surface of Venus only gets 20W/m2 of solar energy (342W/m2 on earth) So the GHE is weak on Venus Why is Mars so cold
Burgess Park tweet media
English
2
0
1
98
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@DamoceK @riisagermerete Det bliver ikke rigtigt af at gentage det. Islam er absolut ikke forbudt ifølge grundloven.... Jeg antager at du mener at nogle muslimske forordninger vil være i strid med grundloven, hvis de blev udført i praksis .... men det gælder faktisk også kristendom, jødedom oa.
Dansk
1
0
0
7
Damoce kay
Damoce kay@DamoceK·
@riisagermerete Islam er forbudt ifølge grundloven og alligevel har de Muslimske friskoler?!
Dansk
1
0
2
40
Merete Riisager
Merete Riisager@riisagermerete·
Hvorfor sagde Socialdemokraterne at de ville “lukke alle muslimske friskoler”, når de ikke har lukket en eneste? Det er da noget mærkeligt noget at sige, hvis man ikke har tænkt sig at gøre det?
Dansk
37
37
366
8.2K
Gabriel Schneider
Gabriel Schneider@SchneidGabriel·
@CColose Comparing the planetary data is the easiest way to show that there is no link between atmospheric composition and temperature.
English
1
0
3
257
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@zexpe ..... but ... but ... the second one is a so much better headline... and it makes our enemies so much more barbaric. 😋
English
0
0
1
14
Ross ☄️ 𝕏
Ross ☄️ 𝕏@zexpe·
It’s interesting why we call them kamikaze drones. We don’t call missiles kamikaze. I guess because they all are and not all drones are. But they aren’t anything new - the V1 ‘doodlebug’ was essentially the same thing but without GPS targeting. thetimes.com/world/middle-e…
English
1
0
0
155
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@zexpe Yep, i was thinking about the doodlebug (V-1) as well. "Suicide" flying bomb 😋
English
1
0
0
23
Ross ☄️ 𝕏
The term fighter plane has remained in use to describe both what we had in WW2 as well as what we have today. I suggest flying bomb is no different in this case.
Ross ☄️ 𝕏 tweet media
English
1
0
0
186
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@22toGod @JJ03massive @theyondan @zexpe @OldMackIsBack Incorrect. Missiles can be guided or unguided. And while its common today to only refer to rocket or jet powered missiles as missiles.. the broad definition includes more. But once more, what does the propulsion have to do with "suicide" or not?
English
2
0
0
27
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@22toGod @JJ03massive @theyondan @zexpe @OldMackIsBack So missiles are suicide missiles? Why use a word such as suicide? One-way would have been more accurate and discriptive... The simple explanation is that it is a "loaded" word, that carries with it an implicit context that they want to exploit... hence propaganda term.
English
1
0
0
42
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@22toGod @JJ03massive @theyondan @zexpe @OldMackIsBack Wrt powered. Several people have said this in this thread, but that is actually not correct. Rocket artillery is a good example. "Suicide" is the part that is confusing, since there is no suicide involved at all. Seems to be entirely a propaganda means in this context.
English
2
0
1
37
axfaxf
axfaxf@StratGamerDK·
@dabelstein @PkayOksy @sonderby Vi har åbenlyst en forskellig opfattelse af, hvad ordene betyder. Jeg tog hverken fejl, eller "lader som om" at venstrefløjen ikke er misundelige. Apropos modenhed.
Dansk
1
0
0
19
axfaxf
axfaxf@StratGamerDK·
@PkayOksy @dabelstein @sonderby Når den ekstreme venstrefløj holder op med at tale til den indre svinehund i form af misundelse. Dine eksempler giver ingen mening i kontekst.
Dansk
2
0
0
23
Kim D. Petersen
Kim D. Petersen@dabelstein·
@StratGamerDK @PkayOksy @sonderby Det du skrev var forkert. Det var det min post handlede om... I stedet for at indrømme at du tog fejl, vælger du så at lade som om at det er alle andre der har "indgroet, ideologisk modstand mod andres velstand" Meget voksent 😉
Dansk
1
0
1
20
axfaxf
axfaxf@StratGamerDK·
@dabelstein @PkayOksy @sonderby "Danskerne samlet set". Det er helt fint at have en indgroet, ideologisk modstand mod andres velstand. Det er bare latterligt.
Dansk
3
0
0
25