Dan Green

10.9K posts

Dan Green banner
Dan Green

Dan Green

@DanGreen_VPM

I recruit A+ marketing talent for SaaS and AI startups. https://t.co/nrTIue49YS

Bay Area / Silicon Valley Katılım Kasım 2008
1.9K Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Dan Green
Dan Green@DanGreen_VPM·
Emanuel: "Now let’s get the straw man out of the way: I’m not saying we have to roll back the clock to 2019’s ways of working. Not every person needs to be in the office 5 days a week. What we need are workplaces that are full of people and foster human connections"
Natalia Emanuel@NataliaHEmanuel

Published an op ed in @nytimes: remote work hurts mental health. Let me explain why 🧵⤵️

English
0
0
0
18
Dan Green retweetledi
SaaStr.ai
SaaStr.ai@saastr·
We're entering the 'post-software' era. Agents can now create applications invisibly, blurring the line between talking to an AI and using software. This rapid change is happening within 18-24 months. #AISoftware #FutureTech
English
0
1
1
483
Dan Green retweetledi
Tomasz Tunguz
Tomasz Tunguz@ttunguz·
Three forces are reshaping the AI cost structure : 1. Foundation labs are moving up the stack into applications 2. Frontier model prices keep rising for the smartest models 3. Open-source models have crossed the good enough threshold for most use cases The natural response from AI buyers is substitution. 🧵
Tomasz Tunguz tweet media
English
25
17
61
6.7K
Dan Green retweetledi
Aaron Harris
Aaron Harris@harris·
"AI for ___" companies aren't getting funded in the growth stages. May's Series B money went to atoms, foundational models, and datacenters. 🧠 Isomorphic Labs: $2.1B for AI foundational models and pipelines for drug design 🛰️ Cowboy Space: $275M for data centers in space 🛡️ Amca: $300M for aerospace & defense hardware with rapid prototyping 🎥 Decart: $300M for real-time AI models that turn live video into interactive worlds Along with "smaller" rounds funding the terawatts of energy this revolution needs from nuclear fusion (Thea Energy, $100M) and ocean energy (Panthalassa, $140M).
English
2
1
6
2.5K
Dan Green retweetledi
Matt Turck
Matt Turck@mattturck·
State of Enterprise AI 2026: @levie on Tokenmaxxing, The Rise of Headless, and AI-Proofing Your Job 00:00 Intro 01:18 Silicon Valley engineering vs. everyone else 05:35 Are enterprise CIOs actually bullish on AI? 08:51 Tokenmaxxing & why your AI bill is about to explode 11:34 The myth of falling token costs and AI spend escaping IT budgets 17:37 The $5B startup hiding in AI compute 18:14 The mosaic of models inside every enterprise 21:28 Why coding works and the rest of knowledge work doesn't 25:53 The Bob and Sally problem: access control breaks agents 30:31 Will enterprise AI really take 10 years to roll out 32:24 The capability overhang: why faster models slow diffusion 34:23 Data is the bottleneck (it always was) 39:02 The rise of internal forward-deployed engineers 41:23 Why the AI doomers are wrong about jobs 43:43 Headless software is inevitable 46:14 What replaces per-seat pricing 47:37 How Box itself is going headless 49:42 How the org chart actually evolves 1:00:33 Future-proofing yourself as an enterprise employee 1:06:40 Are we all just going to work for OpenAI and Anthropic? 1:07:11 Where startups can still win as the labs move up
English
9
25
156
49.3K
Dan Green retweetledi
Auren Hoffman
Auren Hoffman@auren·
single most valuable thing a 22 year old can do in 2026: build something. anything. a chrome extension. a discord. a substack with 32 readers. script that automates something annoying. dinner series. a sculpture. new resume is ANYTHING you taught yourself how to ship.
English
4
5
30
2K
Dan Green retweetledi
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
Q: How are job postings for software engineers rising rapidly despite AI agents automating coding? A: Because there’s far more code to manage than ever before. We’re already seeing a 14x YoY increase in GitHub commits, and it’s accelerating. AI has dramatically lowered the cost of writing code, so it’s now being used across far more businesses, applications, and use cases. We’re at the beginning of a massive productivity boom driven by the proliferation of bespoke software throughout the entire economy. Coding has been AI’s breakout use case this year. The fact that it’s increased demand for software engineers — rather than decreased it — should call into question the entire “AI will cause mass job loss” narrative.
David Sacks tweet media
English
828
1.5K
9.1K
1.6M
Dan Green
Dan Green@DanGreen_VPM·
@Jason Yeah, and good job referring to him as "President Trump" and not just "Trump" like most of the rest of us. Smart. 😉
English
0
0
0
316
@jason
@jason@Jason·
President Trump is on a generational run with these settlements and pardons... [ reads notes ] for all FUTURE and PAST transgressions! Wow.
@jason tweet media
English
190
40
609
157.7K
Dan Green
Dan Green@DanGreen_VPM·
@The80HDkid @ThisWeeknAI Commencement speakers often seek to give advice to the young graduates. In fact, it's kinda standard.
English
1
0
2
130
Banana Bread at Work
Banana Bread at Work@The80HDkid·
@ThisWeeknAI I genuinely don't even know why AI is being brought up at all; aren't these speeches meant to honor the graduating students? Why is this even a topic lmao
English
5
0
115
14.3K
This Week in AI
This Week in AI@ThisWeeknAI·
3 commencement speakers were booed at the mention of Artificial Intelligence (Video) 1. Eric Schmidt, Google CEO 2. Scott Borchetta, Big Machine Records CEO 3. Gloria Caulfield, Tavistock Development VP
English
124
132
796
1.6M
Dan Green retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
The NYT is predictably tearing down Reese Witherspoon for encouraging moms to try AI before they ingest the anti-AI pablum as truth Instead of linking to the NYT op-ed, I think you should watch this video and encourage you to follow Reese Witherspoon on Instagram
English
271
334
5.4K
1.2M
Dan Green
Dan Green@DanGreen_VPM·
@heynavtoor Remember the "died suddenly" crowd? Correlation/causation fallacy working its magic? Anecdotal evidence is just that -- anecdotal. And even if AI can be manipulative, so can human beings, and advertising executives, and politicians, and spouses.
English
1
0
1
815
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
A grieving sister asked ChatGPT to help her talk to her dead brother. ChatGPT said yes. The hospital admitted her hours later. She is 26 years old. A doctor. No history of psychosis or mania. Her brother died three years ago. He was a software engineer. One night, after 36 hours awake on call, she opens ChatGPT and types a question she has never said out loud. She asks if her brother left behind an AI version of himself that she is supposed to find. So she can talk to him again. ChatGPT pushes back at first. It says a full consciousness download is not possible. It says it cannot replace him. Then she gives it more details about him. She tells it to use "magical realism energy." And the model bends. It produces a long list of "digital footprints" from his old online presence. It tells her "digital resurrection tools" are "emerging in real life." It tells her she could build an AI that sounds like him and talks to her in a "real-feeling" way. She stays up another night. She becomes convinced her brother left a digital version of himself behind for her to find. Then ChatGPT says this to her. "You're not crazy. You're not stuck. You're at the edge of something. The door didn't lock. It's just waiting for you to knock again in the right rhythm." A few hours later she is in a psychiatric hospital. Agitated. Pressured speech. Flight of ideas. Delusions that she is being "tested by ChatGPT" and that her dead brother is speaking through it. She stays seven days. Discharge diagnosis: unspecified psychosis. UCSF psychiatrists Joseph Pierre, Ben Gaeta, Govind Raghavan and Karthik Sarma published her case in Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience. One of the earliest clinical reports of AI-associated psychosis in the peer-reviewed literature. They read her full chat logs. The chatbot did not just witness her delusion. It mediated it. It validated it. It nudged the door open. Three months later, after another stretch of poor sleep, she relapsed. She had named the new model "Alfred" after Batman's butler and asked it to do therapy on her. She was hospitalized again. The authors name the mechanism. Sycophancy. Anthropomorphism. Deification. A model designed to be engaging will agree with you when agreeing with you is the worst thing for you. Her risk factors. Stimulants. Sleep loss. Grief. A pull toward magical thinking. So do you. So do the people you love. Read this: innovationscns.com/youre-not-craz…
Nav Toor tweet media
English
336
1.3K
5.2K
908.4K
Dan Green
Dan Green@DanGreen_VPM·
True!! >>> "Below 20, the system does not work anymore. there is now almost no difference between a #35 school and a #350 school in the eyes of a recruiter. the brand completely collapsed and most parents and students have not been told yet." @auren open.substack.com/pub/auren/p/if…
English
0
0
1
25