Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Daniel J. Brunson
39.7K posts

Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

Out of the whole space of bad LLM applications, there is something about this specifically that upsets me on a different level, because it so fundamentally misunderstands the thing it is trying to replace that I fail to understand how the idea ever arose in the first place.
Peter J. Hasson@peterjhasson
You gotta be shitting me
English
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

my thoughts on why philosophers should be thinking about space..
endsdontjustifythemeans.com/p/what-is-the-…
English
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

We've expanded our Theory Sale!
Now featuring more titles, including preorders on upcoming theory titles, and David Harvey's The Story of Capital.
versobooks.com/blogs/news/the…
English

@PAHoyeck Start with the LoC info, end with the font attribution.
English
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

(🧵1/11) For the past year and a half, I've been investigating OpenAI and Sam Altman for @NewYorker. With my coauthor @andrewmarantz, I reviewed never-before-disclosed internal memos, obtained 200+ pages of documents related to a close colleague, including extensive private notes, and interviewed more than 100 people.
OpenAI was founded on the premise that A.I. could be the most dangerous invention in human history—and that its C.E.O. would need to be a person of uncommon integrity. We lay out the most detailed account yet of why Altman was ousted out by board members and executives who came to believe he lacked that integrity, and ask: were they right to allege that he couldn't be trusted?
A thread on some of of our findings:

English
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

This announcement arrives hours after our investigation (newyorker.com/magazine/2026/…) described how OpenAI dissolved its superalignment and AGI-readiness teams and dropped safety from the list of its most significant activities on its IRS filings—and how, when we asked to speak with researchers, working on existential safety, a representative replied "What do you mean by 'existential safety'? That's not, like, a thing."
OpenAI@OpenAI
Introducing the OpenAI Safety Fellowship, a new program supporting independent research on AI safety and alignment—and the next generation of talent. openai.com/index/introduc…
English
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

@SAAPhilosophy
I Am An American Philosopher: Scott Pratt
-An Interview Series with John Capps-
american-philosophy.org/i-am-an-americ…
English
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

@dowellml Totally agree to all of this. This ideology conflates labor market requirements with labor process requirements, as if the doing of a job is the same the doing of getting hired for a job.
English
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

This is manifestly not true. People got extremely attached to the Sojourner rover back in the day—it was plucky and clearly did its best. We saw the same kind of public affection for the Ingenuity helicopter and New Horizons when it photographed Pluto. People like probes.
Jonathan Birch@birchlse
Striking that imaginative engagement with a manned lunar mission is far, far easier for all of us than engaging with a probe or robot - even if they send back the exact same images and data.
English
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi
Daniel J. Brunson retweetledi

When an insurance company is deciding whether to pay for your medical treatment, it generates a file, which should contain all records associated with your case, including documents explaining why the claim was denied.
You have a right to see this file.
propublica.org/article/find-o…
English















