Daniel Remler

41 posts

Daniel Remler banner
Daniel Remler

Daniel Remler

@danielremler

Senior Fellow @CNASdc

Washington, DC Katılım Nisan 2009
1K Takip Edilen283 Takipçiler
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
@ChrisPainterYup Very likely—Italy also had a G7 AI session for leaders (with Pope Francis) when they hosted in 2024. I doubt Sam and Dario were asked to stick around and talk about Ukraine, Iran, etc… But I agree the optics are striking.
English
0
0
1
64
Chris Painter
Chris Painter@ChrisPainterYup·
@danielremler Interesting! Maybe the thing that’s striking me as odd is that this feels like “an official G7 meeting”, but I’m sure this is some kind of AI focused session?
English
1
0
2
326
Chris Painter
Chris Painter@ChrisPainterYup·
I’m no expert on protocol, but in an earlier time would it have been odd to have the leaders of companies (and most of them American) sitting as interleaved co-equals with world leaders like this? Just feels really noticeable here
Chris Painter tweet media
English
8
1
101
15.9K
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
Alibaba now accused of conducting a massive campaign of adversarial distillation against Anthropic—unsurprising considering they face the same compute and expert data constraints as the rest of the PRC AI ecosystem. The question was always when, not if they would do this.
English
3
3
7
1.5K
Daniel Remler retweetledi
CNAS
CNAS@CNASdc·
❗Tomorrow❗ @KhanSaifM, Emily Weinstein, @danielremler, and @ashleyrgold will outline potential U.S. responses to an increasingly critical challenge—the rapidly maturing Chinese AI ecosystem and its instrumentalization by the CCP.
CNAS tweet media
English
1
5
6
2K
Daniel Remler retweetledi
Evan Swarztrauber
Evan Swarztrauber@SayreEvan·
Microsoft is reportedly considering a partnership with Chinese AI firm DeepSeek. A new report from @CNASdc says "DeepSeek-based agents are 12 times more likely to follow malicious instructions than their U.S. counterparts." x.com/CNASdc/status/…
CNAS@CNASdc

Framing the emerging tech competition with China comparatively—in terms of an “AI race”—obscures the national security risks posed by the rapidly expanding Chinese AI ecosystem. A new report by @danielremler lays out a framework for understanding the absolute risks posed by frontier Chinese systems and preparing policymakers to address them.

English
1
6
15
4K
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
AI is increasingly a core pillar of China's vision of global governance, nearly always framed in terms of the centrality of the UN and supporting developing countries. The "proposed" World AI Cooperation Organization sure sounds like it will be announced soon...
Mao Ning 毛宁@SpoxCHN_MaoNing

China released a white paper titled “More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.” Full text: english.news.cn/20260617/1f771…

English
0
0
1
82
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
@dee_bosa And what kind of testing will MSFT do before they onboard the models—they haven’t disclosed doing any testing before hosting any Chinese model on Azure since DeepSeek-R1.
English
0
0
1
170
Deirdre Bosa
Deirdre Bosa@dee_bosa·
Was only a matter of time. Deepseek already hosted on hyperscaler clouds since last year… Microsoft moving closer to it for enterprise just normalizes DeepSeek and gives cover for others to embrace/adopt (which is already happening) Bigger q: does this give the Chinese stack a foot in the door in the US since DeepSeek is optimizing for Huawei chips?
Axios@axios

Microsoft eyes DeepSeek for enterprise AI axios.com/2026/06/16/mic…

English
27
28
217
66K
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
@shashj Commerce/BIS isn't immune from judicial review—Anthropic could sue and IMHO has a pretty reasonable case (APA violation, exceeding statutory authority, etc.).
English
0
0
2
91
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
Given this gap, I expect China to produce a "Mythos-class" model by or around the end of 2026, probably with open weights. That and other capabilities will mark a meaningful threshold that puts Americans at serious risk (as I argue in my new report: cnas.org/publications/r…)
English
0
0
1
79
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
That puts DeepSeek (current Chinese lead) at least 6 months behind Anthropic (current American lead). I'd add another 2+ months given China's faster product cycle (less safety testing) and limited compute. Countering adversarial distillation could soon widen this gap further.
English
1
0
1
127
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
My best guess is that China is at least ~6-8 months from producing a model as cyber-capable as the (currently export controlled) Mythos and Fable 5, based on a comparison of the leading developers on the best agentic cyber benchmark plus some additional assumptions.
English
1
0
5
726
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
The report offers 6 recommendations—rapid assessments, cybersecurity advisories, testing standards, allied coordination, and semiannual ecosystem reporting. All doable with existing authorities. Full report here: cnas.org/publications/r…
English
0
0
3
288
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
Export controls have helped maintain the U.S. lead. But the United States, our allies, and the U.S. private sector have exerted near-zero pressure on Chinese AI systems specifically. Commerce has published just three, thin assessments of Chinese systems, each delayed weeks. /8
English
1
0
3
305
Daniel Remler
Daniel Remler@danielremler·
The Western AI community has spent years scrutinizing U.S. developers while giving China a free pass—I turn the tables in my new @CNASdc report, "Red Lines: Understanding the National Security Risks of China's Advanced AI": 🧵
English
2
6
18
4K