@nyneuropsych @NerdeenKiswani Zionists don’t get to define anything since they’ve committed genocide.
English
Johnnysmithereenze
27.3K posts
@NerdeenKiswani Who gets to define what it is? The Zionist or you? Can you also define Black people's movement for them? What about for LGBTQ people? The supremacy comes from the one who thinks they have a right to define another group.
English
Johnnysmithereenze retweetledi
You don’t get to say it’s acceptable to criticize Zionism but then call it antisemitic the moment that people actually define what it is. ‘Jewish supremacy’ isn’t an attack on Jews as a people. It’s a direct description of an ideology that structures power, land, and rights in a way that privileges Jews over others, particularly Palestinians.
Organizermemes@OrganizerMemes
"Jewish supremacy" is the easiest tell of when someone's Anti zionism is just antisemitism the equivalent to the right using "radical Islam" a decade ago, not distinguishing between religion and extremist ideology Especially since the vast majority of Zionists are Christian
English
Top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT), says President Trump is “flat-out lying” about diplomacy talks with Iran.
“Last Sunday, he realized, ‘Oh my God, I've got a financial cataclysm on Monday,’ so he just made it up that they’re in negotiation with the Iranians,” he says. “Underneath that statement, the Iranians have now realized they have the reins. They are controlling the Strait of Hormuz. Gasoline prices are up more than $1 a gallon.”
English
@HeerJeet Centrists try to clean up the messes, not sure today's progressives have ever wiped a counter.
English
Elite Democrats -- rather than admitting that they ran flawed, centrist campaigns in 2016 and 2024 -- are prepared to govern their selection of a presidential nominee by racism, sexism, homophobia and Christian nationalism. Good work, people.
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022
AXIOS: Some top Democrats are quietly debating a fraught question: whether the party's best bet for winning back the presidency in 2028 is to nominate a man — perhaps a straight, White, Christian man. Former first lady Michelle Obama fueled such talk recently, saying the U.S. is "not ready for a woman." Democratic strategists have put it bluntly, with several saying a version of "It has to be a white guy." axios.com/2026/03/29/som…
English
Johnnysmithereenze retweetledi
Opinion: The only way Israel can govern the Gaza Strip without becoming an external oppressor of “another people” is to remove “the other people” from the confines of the Gaza Strip itself.
jpost.com/opinion/articl…
English
Johnnysmithereenze retweetledi
I warned Biden and Harris directly: Our silence on Gaza was morally, legally, and politically wrong.
We were told it wasn't in the data. That wasn't strategy – it was risk aversion dressed up as wisdom.
Democrats cannot make that same mistake again this midterm season.
English
@austinahlman @Tyler_A_Harper Identity doesn’t matter as much as left wing populism does.
Democrats will win if they nominate a left wing populist in the mold of FDR.
English
Love this version of woke liberalism where you can’t admit that Clinton and Harris were fatally flawed candidates for reasons that had nothing to do with their gender, so now we can never have a woman president.
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022
AXIOS: Some top Democrats are quietly debating a fraught question: whether the party's best bet for winning back the presidency in 2028 is to nominate a man — perhaps a straight, White, Christian man. Former first lady Michelle Obama fueled such talk recently, saying the U.S. is "not ready for a woman." Democratic strategists have put it bluntly, with several saying a version of "It has to be a white guy." axios.com/2026/03/29/som…
English
Translation $7 a gallon on the East Coast and $9 a gallon on the West Coast if this nightmare scenario came to fruition
Polymarket@Polymarket
BREAKING: U.S. officials & Wall Street analysts are now reportedly preparing for the possibility of $200 oil.
English
@allengarvin @EyeOnStalk @HistoryBoomer Moody v Net Choice sent the case back to the lower courts.
Algorithms are no more speech than opiates, money, or explosives are.
I wouldn’t have a problem with replacing any judge, Supreme Court or otherwise, who failed to understand this.
English
@danton3wuzhere @EyeOnStalk @HistoryBoomer Moody v Net Choice was 9-0. You'll need to replace the liberals AND the conservatives, specifically choosing justices disinclined to traditional first amendment jurisprudence.
I doubt that would end well for the first amendment.
English
I'm with David.
Social media is awful (yes, I'm here, I'm part of the problem), but we can't throw out the free speech baby to get rid of some crappy social media bathwater.
Parents and schools should crack down on children's phone/screen usage, not the government.
David French@DavidAFrench
I am alarmed by the negative influence of smartphones and social media on children. All of us should be. I am also worried that in our zeal to protect children from those negative influences that we will violate the Constitution and undermine free speech. nytimes.com/2026/03/29/opi…
English
@allengarvin @EyeOnStalk @HistoryBoomer They didn’t explicitly rule that algorithms were speech.
But easier than passing a constitutional amendment would be packing the court with justices that aren’t morons.
English
@danton3wuzhere @EyeOnStalk @HistoryBoomer "Algorithms are not speech"
SCOTUS disagrees. Feel free to pass a constitutional amendment.
English
@allengarvin @EyeOnStalk @HistoryBoomer Yes there’s a major difference between infinite scroll and the end of a feed.
Algorithms are not speech. They’re a surveillance tool that shows content based on your history.
English
@danton3wuzhere @EyeOnStalk @HistoryBoomer I don't get the fascination with infinite scroll. Is there any measurable difference between that and "You've reached the end of the feed. Hit refresh for more content"?
"Force algorithms to be less addictive" sounds like textbook compelled speech.
English
@Aintropy @MattZeitlin Even worse when the uniparty went to war in Iran and blew hundreds of billions at the expense of everyone in the country.
Netanyahu benefited though
English
@MattZeitlin Amazing when the Uniparty united to stop automation of ports as a giveaway to longshoreman at the expense of the other 99.99% of the country.
English
this is why i think the turn to post-liberal economics among both republicans and democrats will not lead to enduring consensus or popularity, people really do like cheap stuff
Greg Ip@greg_ip
Greenspan "explained what was behind [the last decade's] extraordinary slowdown in US inflation. One indicator in particular was key, he said...I couldn’t help interjecting. 'The import price of Chinese goods!'... Greenspan ... asked whether I cared to deliver the rest of the presentation." Chris Antsey @ @BW on the key difference between Internet's contribution to low inflation in the 90s, and AI's today. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
English
@EyeOnStalk @HistoryBoomer No just end infinite scroll and force algorithms to be less addictive.
English
@HistoryBoomer I’m fine having an age limit before kids can go on social media. It’s not a speech thing. There are plenty of laws about advertising to kids, plenty of movies you can’t watch until you’re a certain age.
English
@HistoryBoomer @DavidAFrench This is bullshit.
Things like infinite scroll and algorithmic feeds absolutely ARE addictive and are no more an example of “free speech” than crack cocaine.
English
@JustinWolfers @joncoopertweets It also means lower wages because the labor supply increases (otherwise businesses wouldn’t care about increasing immigration).
Low wages with high profits leads to massive wealth inequality and a political system purchased by the rich which is exactly what we have.
English
Immigrants weren’t just filling existing jobs; they were helping create them. That’s Econ 101: jobs are not a fixed pie. More people means more customers, more demand, more businesses expanding, and yes, more hiring.
English
@JoJoFromJerz They’re paid off by Israel to support this war.
English
Where the fuck is Congress?!?!
The Washington Post@washingtonpost
The Pentagon is preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, U.S. officials said. It would fall short of a full-scale invasion and could involve raids by a mixture of Special Operations forces and conventional infantry troops, said the officials. wapo.st/4sGVkjV
English
Johnnysmithereenze retweetledi
Holy shit! Iran just called out Trump for being blackmailed by Israel due to his involvement with Epstein:
“There is no doubt Trump, under pressure from the terrorist organization Mossad due to his background in the Epstein case, has become a pawn of Israel and Netanyahu.” 🔥🔥
English
Johnnysmithereenze retweetledi
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in 1982: “We have started three wars.”
Bill Maher: “No, you did not.”
CaseStudyQB@CaseStudyQB
HBO (3/27/2026): Bill Maher "Every war Israel has fought is a war of defense, every war, they were attacked first"
English
@mtracey It took Alexander the Great 10 years to conquer Persia.
English
Bannon calls for “total war” on Iran. “President Trump’s in. We’re in, too,” he says. “We’re gonna go back and re-do what Alexander the Great did 2,300 years ago.”
English
Johnnysmithereenze retweetledi
“We need to know exactly who talked him into it.”
Megyn Kelly, who opposes the Iran war, says that now that the war “is going poorly,” we need to see “some accountability” not from Trump, who decided to go to war, but from activists and journalists on the right who supposedly convinced him to do it.
Real journalism right there, acting like Trump has zero agency.
English