Douglas Brown

2.5K posts

Douglas Brown banner
Douglas Brown

Douglas Brown

@darkwaterjack

Recovering criminal lawyer. Semi-libertarian. Free speech fanatic. Somewhat contrarian, often annoying. Opinions given freely. 🇳🇿 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 עם ישראל חי

New Zealand Katılım Ocak 2024
492 Takip Edilen429 Takipçiler
Douglas Brown
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack·
Well, that isn't true at all. Firstly, @EricaStanfordMP is busy removing parental choice on whether under-16-year-olds can access social media (while requiring their parents to provide proof of their own age to access it as well), and then, just last night, she also rammed through the House massive new regulation-making authority for the MoE over homeschooling parents. That was done without consultation, and after the Select Committee had already reported back so parents never got the chance to submit to Parliament on the changes. It seems that the @NZNationalParty is, in fact, becoming the Party of taking parental rights away, not supporting them.
English
0
1
2
14
Joseph Mooney MP
Joseph Mooney MP@JosephMooneyMP·
What do you think, should parents be responsible for their own children? The left don’t think so, the right do.
English
2
0
10
279
inspider
inspider@inspidernz·
@AlanWilkinsonNZ @darkwaterjack @FullTwatforward And that's the key point. Many people who have to compete for cash from customers get nothing like this, and none of these people have to do that or face accountability for failures that ratepayers have to fund
English
1
0
3
10
Douglas Brown
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack·
High Court Judge $518,000 Prime Minister $484,200 District Court Judge $393,700 DPM $344,100 Cabinet Minister $304,300 Minister outside Cabinet $256,800 Backbench MP $168,600 Nice to be a senior Wellington CC staffer, eh? Poor Andrew Little, though! brashandmitchell.com/post/wellingto…
Douglas Brown tweet media
English
22
36
82
3.6K
Douglas Brown retweetledi
🗣 Free Speech Union ✊
🗣 Free Speech Union ✊@NZFreeSpeech·
You cannot age-verify children without age-verifying adults.  To stop a 15-year-old creating an account, platforms must first know whether every other user is over 16. That means building identity-checking systems for the entire population - not just children.  This isn't a side effect. It's the design.  A policy sold as protecting children is, in practice, an identity infrastructure for everyone. That's the debate we should be having.
🗣 Free Speech Union ✊ tweet media
English
28
120
351
2.7K
Douglas Brown
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack·
Cynthia Hancox has a good summary of the proposals on her website. However, the short answer is that we just don't know. The Ministry, though, assures us that there will be better outcomes for everyone, although they don't know what the current outcomes are... t.co/sGbi9T2d1G
English
1
0
2
211
Douglas Brown
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack·
There are over 11,000 homeschooling kids in NZ. Most are overwhelmingly successful in their educational outcomes. But yesterday, @EricaStanfordMP, in an incredibly undemocratic move, snuck major changes to homeschooling law into a Bill after it had gone through Select Committee. By doing this, the Minister has ensured that none of the parents of those 11,000 children has had the opportunity to submit to Parliament about the proposed changes. The Minister is simply giving the Secretary for Education untrammelled power over the educational lives of those families, without their input, and in an underhanded way, by allowing for the introduction of regulations about homeschooling as the Secretary wishes. The Ministry has not shown that there is a need for this. Instead, it is simply barrelling through with changes without even telling homeschoolers about them. In fact, they flat out refused to meet with homeschoolers, despite that community's efforts to engage with them. If they had met, they could have found out that there is no need for any changes. This sort of underhanded, undemocratic behaviour is appalling, especially coming from a @NZNationalParty Minister. Erica Stanford could have been upfront about this and put the changes in the Education and Training (System Reform) Amendment Bill from the start. Instead, she is making a last-moment change when she thinks outside scrutiny has passed. The proposed amendments to this Bill relating to homeschooling are an outrageous affront to democracy. This is not tinkering around the edges; they are a fundamental change to a system that has worked brilliantly for decades. @Parmjeet_Parmar, you must not let this go unanswered by the @actparty. What has it come to, when the National Party, whose values include Individual freedom and choice, Personal responsibility, Limited government, and Strong families and caring communities, act in this sneaky, anti-democratic manner? Or is it an Erica Stanford problem? First the U16 Social Media ban, which will require every NZer to prove their age and identity in order to use social media, and now this. Either way, it seems that there is a real problem here. beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/…
English
45
117
328
10.1K
Douglas Brown retweetledi
HOPE + Health 💚🕊 🇳🇿 💙
General ERO visits to homeschoolers were canned years ago as parents were doing wonderfully well in educating their children. Wasn't worth ERO time. There was still provision for visits to be made if ERO was notified.
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack

There are over 11,000 homeschooling kids in NZ. Most are overwhelmingly successful in their educational outcomes. But yesterday, @EricaStanfordMP, in an incredibly undemocratic move, snuck major changes to homeschooling law into a Bill after it had gone through Select Committee. By doing this, the Minister has ensured that none of the parents of those 11,000 children has had the opportunity to submit to Parliament about the proposed changes. The Minister is simply giving the Secretary for Education untrammelled power over the educational lives of those families, without their input, and in an underhanded way, by allowing for the introduction of regulations about homeschooling as the Secretary wishes. The Ministry has not shown that there is a need for this. Instead, it is simply barrelling through with changes without even telling homeschoolers about them. In fact, they flat out refused to meet with homeschoolers, despite that community's efforts to engage with them. If they had met, they could have found out that there is no need for any changes. This sort of underhanded, undemocratic behaviour is appalling, especially coming from a @NZNationalParty Minister. Erica Stanford could have been upfront about this and put the changes in the Education and Training (System Reform) Amendment Bill from the start. Instead, she is making a last-moment change when she thinks outside scrutiny has passed. The proposed amendments to this Bill relating to homeschooling are an outrageous affront to democracy. This is not tinkering around the edges; they are a fundamental change to a system that has worked brilliantly for decades. @Parmjeet_Parmar, you must not let this go unanswered by the @actparty. What has it come to, when the National Party, whose values include Individual freedom and choice, Personal responsibility, Limited government, and Strong families and caring communities, act in this sneaky, anti-democratic manner? Or is it an Erica Stanford problem? First the U16 Social Media ban, which will require every NZer to prove their age and identity in order to use social media, and now this. Either way, it seems that there is a real problem here. beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/…

English
0
1
2
71
Douglas Brown
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack·
The ministry has now uploaded the regulatory impact statement on the amendment, albeit to a different location than that set out in the amendment paper. I’ll do a post later on with the effect of some of the changes they propose. Suffice to say, they’ve done no consultation and there is no evidence to support anything they are proposing.
English
0
2
24
426
Douglas Brown retweetledi
Chris
Chris@AdtebeateIoseph·
If this is correct, this is a Machiavellian manoeuvre and signals a deep distrust of parents @EricaStanfordMP. Homeschooling is a valid, legal and positive option for many. They have done nothing to deserve such underhanded tactics.
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack

There are over 11,000 homeschooling kids in NZ. Most are overwhelmingly successful in their educational outcomes. But yesterday, @EricaStanfordMP, in an incredibly undemocratic move, snuck major changes to homeschooling law into a Bill after it had gone through Select Committee. By doing this, the Minister has ensured that none of the parents of those 11,000 children has had the opportunity to submit to Parliament about the proposed changes. The Minister is simply giving the Secretary for Education untrammelled power over the educational lives of those families, without their input, and in an underhanded way, by allowing for the introduction of regulations about homeschooling as the Secretary wishes. The Ministry has not shown that there is a need for this. Instead, it is simply barrelling through with changes without even telling homeschoolers about them. In fact, they flat out refused to meet with homeschoolers, despite that community's efforts to engage with them. If they had met, they could have found out that there is no need for any changes. This sort of underhanded, undemocratic behaviour is appalling, especially coming from a @NZNationalParty Minister. Erica Stanford could have been upfront about this and put the changes in the Education and Training (System Reform) Amendment Bill from the start. Instead, she is making a last-moment change when she thinks outside scrutiny has passed. The proposed amendments to this Bill relating to homeschooling are an outrageous affront to democracy. This is not tinkering around the edges; they are a fundamental change to a system that has worked brilliantly for decades. @Parmjeet_Parmar, you must not let this go unanswered by the @actparty. What has it come to, when the National Party, whose values include Individual freedom and choice, Personal responsibility, Limited government, and Strong families and caring communities, act in this sneaky, anti-democratic manner? Or is it an Erica Stanford problem? First the U16 Social Media ban, which will require every NZer to prove their age and identity in order to use social media, and now this. Either way, it seems that there is a real problem here. beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/…

English
1
2
13
213
Douglas Brown
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack·
Just insane. A gang member, fleeing police, riding a motorbike at 85-93km/h (or maybe more) in a 30km/h zone, blasts through a partially obstructed intersection, hits a car departing a stop sign and is killed. And the @nzpolice prosecute the driver of the car! Read the article. How on earth did the Police even decide that this passed the first stage of evidential sufficiency, let alone the second stage, the Public Interest Test, as set out in the Solicitor General's Prosecution Guidelines? Further, the prosecution has a continuing obligation to review the evidence as it comes in, to determine whether it still meets the threshold for prosecution. While it is always dangerous to rely too much on a media report, the description of the Serious Crash Unit officer's evidence seems seriously lacking, something that should have been obvious to the prosecution well before the trial began. Anybody with half a brain could see that a person travelling at 23-33 metres per second when they are supposed to be moving at 8m per second is going to take any other driver crossing that intersection completely by surprise. Nobody would be looking far enough down the road to see the bike coming. Far out, man, how punitive are we as a society that we think it is a good idea to prosecute this poor woman? I don't know. Maybe I am wrong, and she will be convicted. But, to me, this just seems like the Police being nasty. If this guy had stopped, like he was obliged to when the red and blues flashed at him, or had been doing 30km/h, like he was supposed to, he would be alive today. This man's death, unfortunate as it is, is on him. Why, @MarkMitchellMP, do the PPS not see that? The IPCA report into the McSkimming scandal showed that the PPS, even at senior levels, has issues with these basic concepts (see [219]-[305]), but this should have been quite easy, even for them. Or maybe I am just too much the defence lawyer. nzherald.co.nz/nz/trial-begin…
English
0
2
8
86
Douglas Brown
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack·
If this is true, and the New Zealand government doesn't grab it with both hands, it is nuts. Do it, do it now, and reap the benefits. Ukraine are now the world's acknowledged leader in asymmetrical drone warfare, both offensive and defensive. We should get on board ASAP. rnz.co.nz/news/political…
English
0
0
3
96
Douglas Brown
Douglas Brown@darkwaterjack·
@Dame__Jane I was never more glad than when the Law Society got the DIA to agree they didn't apply to Barristers! My solicitor colleagues grumble about them endlessly, but you are right, they end up costing the consumer more for their work.
English
1
0
1
36
Dame Jane
Dame Jane@Dame__Jane·
@darkwaterjack Yes the AML requirements seems to be an absolute nightmare. And makes everything cost more as there’s so much more paperwork to wade thru!
English
1
0
1
86
Dame Jane
Dame Jane@Dame__Jane·
Why do lawyers insist on asking people to furnish paper documents when many (most?) of us get these things electronically? It’s not like the 80s when everything was snail mailed to you. And what if I didn’t have a passport? I do, but not everyone does .. 🤷‍♀️
Dame Jane tweet media
English
19
1
21
773
Eric Crampton
Eric Crampton@EricCrampton·
[Excluding contracts specifically given to the state monopoly (govt loves some monopolies!) gambling franchise, and those specifically regulated as casino games.]
English
1
0
2
277
Douglas Brown retweetledi
Preston Byrne
Preston Byrne@prestonjbyrne·
The UK's Internet censor, Ofcom, is apparently harassing random hobby website operators in Kentucky, who have already geoblocked the UK, to get them to comply with the Online Safety Act.
Preston Byrne tweet media
English
101
585
10.2K
375.6K