DasCapytal

@Plinz @UnkleWA @mrkocnnll Based

@UnkleWA @mrkocnnll I am ok with going to prison if it keeps my family and other families safe. If you break into my sanctum, you can try again next life

2026 so far

@0xexpt Are u gonna call?

A customer just left me this note on his bill ... wtf ???

@AngelicaOung "be a dog and we'll make u rich" has always made sense to me

It’s becoming increasingly obvious to me that South Korea and Taiwan democratized not because of any organic internal drive or yearning, but because they were a part of the US alliance structure and was pressured externally to democratize. Why didn’t China democratize even as it grew rich? Well simple it simply wasn’t as vulnerable to American pressure. As a result China retained its sovereignty, avoided shock therapy, and is well-positioned to go toe-to-toe with the US as we return to the era of great power competition.

@timo_rf @thekitze absolutely bait iykyk

reading this book last year literally changed my life for the best. you will start seeing the world differently. highly recommended.

@o_wutang not lossy, just not fool-proof. but why would you want that! write with blood, ye astute observer

I must admit that every article I publish is a lossy translation. I’ve touched on this briefly in the past: multidimensional structures lose information when converted into sequential sentences. This is a property of the medium, not the writer. Scientists and philosophers have spent careers finding the best ways to translate the structure in their head. Some use math. Some use words. Some take years. Some take decades. 道可道，非常道。 Laozi documented this constraint 2500 years ago.

@Andercot about time we get a schizo physics pod

Hyperstition #5: Observer Theory, the computational universe and Stephen Wolfram's Ruliad x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@AngelicaOung @GeorgeR21234525 @timothyjwyant Its actually incredible how unphased you are towards people who are helpless triggered by your stance on you-know-what. Somehow your replies are still genuine - baffled i tell ya!

@GeorgeR21234525 @timothyjwyant Actually 2 of the three are fathers with multiple children. Try again, aww…

It’s wild to see this account, which is basically a mouthpiece for CCP talking points, come out with the conclusion that people in Finland aren’t having kids because they believe the kids’ lives will be shitty. Just copious amounts of nonsense.

@nikitabier @levelsio You'll find that the party is not sale. Downstream fom there you'll then find reluctance in selling things that the party does not want to be sold. Reluctance out of fear vs the European reluctance out of shame. Either way, a powerful human motivator.

@levelsio Everything is for sale in China. There is always a price. In Europe, nothing is for sale. If it breaks tradition, the seller would prefer to be poor then sell you it.

Someone else said "America is a socialist country pretending to be capitalist. China is a capitalist country pretending to be socialist"

@GivnerAriel you're betrayal of the alliance is noted and your address will not be elligible for future airdrops have a nice day

As a “woman in web3” I am anti the women in web3 that make being a woman in web3 their entire personality. I genuinely think this approach makes us all look bad. Just build cool things that people want to use.

@0x9212ce55 Local inference or what?

Upgrading to 128GB RAM has probably got me the highest ROI this year.

@EvgenyGaevoy @humidifi (anyone)

@humidifi ouch, could have happened to anyone (I guess)

Some real dry shit happened today. Humidifi started 6 months ago from nothing, straight from the trenches of DeFi 1.0. In those 6 months, for SOL-USD, we started quoting tighter and doing more volume than Binance. We did not kiss any ass or bend the knee to anyone. We started DeFi 2.0 with a vision of bringing liquidity to the people. The public sale today only brought liquidity to one sniper, fuck that guy. Humidifi will never turn its back on the trenches. For the public sale, a bot farm sniped the entire supply instantly and weterans were not able to participate. I shed some real humid tears and crashed out. Here is why this dry shit happened: They set up thousands of wallets, each having 1000 USDC. For each wallet, there was an instruction created, that triggered the deposit of funds into the DTF smart contract. This is like a button that says put 1000 USDC into DTF to buy WET. Then a transaction was made that pressed 6 of these buttons at the same time. Per bundle sent (a lot of bundles were sent), 4 transactions were executed. 4 transactions that triggered 6 instructions each, for a total of 24,000 USDC or ~350,000 WET for each bundle. So what’s going to happen next in the WaterWorld? We are creating a new token. All Wetlist and JUP staker buyers will receive a pro-rata airdrop. The sniper is not getting shit, fuck that guy. We will do a new public sale on Monday. The Temporal chads @cavemanloverboy and @joebuild have helped write a new DTF contract with weterans top of mind. It has been audited by @osec_io. Let’s make @solana wet again. More details soon. Billions must get wet

Sharing an interesting recent conversation on AI's impact on the economy. AI has been compared to various historical precedents: electricity, industrial revolution, etc., I think the strongest analogy is that of AI as a new computing paradigm (Software 2.0) because both are fundamentally about the automation of digital information processing. If you were to forecast the impact of computing on the job market in ~1980s, the most predictive feature of a task/job you'd look at is to what extent the algorithm of it is fixed, i.e. are you just mechanically transforming information according to rote, easy to specify rules (e.g. typing, bookkeeping, human calculators, etc.)? Back then, this was the class of programs that the computing capability of that era allowed us to write (by hand, manually). With AI now, we are able to write new programs that we could never hope to write by hand before. We do it by specifying objectives (e.g. classification accuracy, reward functions), and we search the program space via gradient descent to find neural networks that work well against that objective. This is my Software 2.0 blog post from a while ago. In this new programming paradigm then, the new most predictive feature to look at is verifiability. If a task/job is verifiable, then it is optimizable directly or via reinforcement learning, and a neural net can be trained to work extremely well. It's about to what extent an AI can "practice" something. The environment has to be resettable (you can start a new attempt), efficient (a lot attempts can be made), and rewardable (there is some automated process to reward any specific attempt that was made). The more a task/job is verifiable, the more amenable it is to automation in the new programming paradigm. If it is not verifiable, it has to fall out from neural net magic of generalization fingers crossed, or via weaker means like imitation. This is what's driving the "jagged" frontier of progress in LLMs. Tasks that are verifiable progress rapidly, including possibly beyond the ability of top experts (e.g. math, code, amount of time spent watching videos, anything that looks like puzzles with correct answers), while many others lag by comparison (creative, strategic, tasks that combine real-world knowledge, state, context and common sense). Software 1.0 easily automates what you can specify. Software 2.0 easily automates what you can verify.

don't let me miss the next one pls 🥺

@gregosuri @MonetSupply Monet chuckled x.com/monetsupply/st…

@MonetSupply Mortgage-backed securities are "secured loans" too. I'm afraid common sense prevails over competency here, which tells you Tether overplayed their hand with $6b in equity, coming from someone that lost a meaningful amount with $UST.

Tether has $174B in liabilities and $139B in cash to cover it; it’s a ticking time bomb at this point. I would exit $USDT to be safe.

I mean its a great find but a spotless persona is far from “doesnt feel the need to sin”. Jung’s theory isn’t “falling apart” because a man presents a flawless image for three days. It reads like Jung initially thought that this man is quite integrated to the point Jung’s considering imitating, and every day that goes by Jung doesn’t find any evidence of compensation, he’s further drawn into that narrative. But sure enough Jung finds it in the man’s wife. Now an observer could say Jung is delusional here - he had a hammer and was looking for a nail and what do you know, he finds a “nail” that’s so far fetched that it wasn’t even on the same board, which is lol, fair enough. But like any good observer we’ll hold these possibilities in mind as we explore the original topic, which Im sure is a controversial one among you scholars of the depth. So far the Jung strongman narrative would be: his models have pretty high utility, across board from art to history to psychology to human condition at large. He had to involve other women or more accurately, this woman Toni Wolff, to achieve what he achieved. Though to those not deeply acquainted with his work and their impact on numerous aspects of life, this narrative is also quite common: he is a crack and maybe has a few good ideas but the act of fucking other women (not to mention a former patient) is evidence enough to write off his character, along with his theories. Now a narrative that most of us have surely entertained: his models are great but sexually involving Toni is too reckless and then too copey for our taste, us strivers. We acknowledge the problem is far from trivial but we do not intend to imitate if we can help it. Even if this means we wont be the next big dog breakthrough psyche discoverer. What is that title to us anyway? If your solution to the Sex at Dawn problem is insist on your monk-like will, I only wish you the very best, as i do for the ones who burn in a sitting lotus.

Jung’s anecdote in Collected Works, vol. 7 Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, in the essay “The Relations between the Ego and the Unconscious,” §306–307. The set-up is exactly as you remembered: Jung meets a man so “saintly” he can’t spot a single flaw for three days; on the fourth day the man’s wife arrives, and Jung realizes the husband’s shadow is being carried by (and expressed through) the wife. Here’s a short, compliant excerpt (emphasis mine): “I stalked round him for three whole days… never a mortal failing did I find. On the fourth day, his wife came to consult me.” jungiancenter.org Jung then explains (paraphrasing to stay within quoting limits): when someone identifies with a spotless persona, the psyche “compensates” so that the disowned disturbances show up at home—often through the spouse, who pays for it with a bad neurosis. That’s the line people summarize as “all the dark aspects were in the wife,” i.e., she is made to carry the husband’s shadow. (Same passage, §306–307.) jungiancenter.org Exact source & where to read it C.G. Jung, The Relations between the Ego and the Unconscious, in CW 7, §306–307. The passage is visible on pp. 265–266 in this edition (Princeton/Bollingen, trans. R.F.C. Hull). Scans of the exact pages: p. 265 (start of §306) and p. 266 (the anecdote and §307) ------------------------------------------------------- I think the man bonded to the wrong woman and if was better informed/wiser would have avoided marrying a harpy, and would have had a much much more ecstatic/happier life...

Jung cheated on his wife with several female patients to integrate his anima.

We think effective coordination is insane because it’s basically the most unstable chemical our species ever cooked up, a fucking miracle compound that lets a few schizos briefly share a brain and start building god-engines before some stray ego triggers a Chernobyl meltdown, or worse, the persona cunts inevitably show up and scramble the whole thing into a soup of bureaucratic dark matter. Meanwhile they think it’s like free wifi bro just hit connect bro, and some magical protocol takes deeply profound solution and automatically herds ten trillion neurons into alignment.

insane the number of posts that are just like “just spin up a rare earth mineral supply chain. how hard could it be?”

@lexfridman @durov Lost it

Here's my 4+ hour conversation with Pavel Durov (@durov), founder and CEO of Telegram. This was one of the most fascinating and powerful conversations I've ever had in my life. We discuss everything from his philosophy on freedom to government bureaucracies, intelligence agencies, human nature, mathematics, encryption, great engineering & design, education, family, and his philosophy on life. It's here on X in full and is up everywhere else (see comment). It is translated and dubbed into Russian, Ukrainian, French, and Hindi. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:07 - Philosophy of freedom 6:15 - No alcohol 14:20 - No phone 20:16 - Discipline 41:28 - Telegram: Lean philosophy, privacy, and geopolitics 56:50 - Arrest in France 1:13:01 - Romanian elections 1:23:56 - Power and corruption 1:33:29 - Intense education 1:45:29 - Nikolai Durov 1:49:58 - Programming and video games 1:54:11 - VK origins & engineering 2:11:24 - Hiring a great team 2:20:40 - Telegram engineering & design 2:39:42 - Encryption 2:44:39 - Open source 2:49:26 - Edward Snowden 2:51:58 - Intelligence agencies 2:53:10 - Iran and Russia government pressure 2:56:19 - Apple 3:03:16 - Poisoning 3:29:28 - Elon Musk 3:35:31 - Money 3:44:23 - TON 3:54:13 - Bitcoin 3:57:12 - Two chairs dilemma 4:03:52 - Children 4:15:02 - Father 4:19:33 - Quantum immortality 4:26:05 - Kafka

@diomuarr you cant even delete that shit what fking world do we live in

@elonmusk wawaweewa very nice i like

Starlink now available in Kazakhstan 🇰🇿