datom. ｲｪｨ♡

この記事、見出しの『ナフサ不足でぎょうざ危機』という言葉だけに踊らされずに、中身をよく読んでくださいね。エフピコや中央化学など容器大手4社が来月（6月1日）から20〜30%値上げと発表しました。 ぎょうざの満洲は、このコスト高騰を単なる危機で終わらせず、店都合の過剰なプラトレイを廃止して袋入り冷凍にシフトする超有能な経営判断を下しました。 トレイを無くした結果、資材コストを3割削り、1個あたり30円⇒25円への『実質値下げ』を達成して一般消費者に還元しています。消費者はお得になり、冷凍庫もゴミ箱もかさばらない。そしてプラスチックゴミも激減する。ゴミ袋も削減出来るという効果をもたらしています。 記事を読めば分かりますけど、ぎょうざの満洲は無駄なプラスチックのトレイをやめて袋入りに変えた結果、資材コストを3割削って、ギョーザ1個あたりの値段を30円から25円に値下げして一般消費者に還元してるという話なんです。

脅されたからって強盗してそこのおばあさん殺して良いって話にならんだろ やったことには責任取らんとな ◯刑

この記事は、見出し・内容ともに提言の本旨をミスリードしています。本日19日に開催された党会議で、私も取りまとめに参加した提言では、「年齢確認」についての議論はあるも、そこでの「年齢確認」は、SNS利用時ではなく、スマホ端末購入時の話です。 事業者の安全に対する取組の透明性の確保と実効性の担保を推進するため、スマホ端末購入時の年齢確認を厳格にしようという議論が行われたのです。 この記事には「SNSのサービスを利用し始める人にはSNS事業者から『適正な年齢以上なのか』を確かめることを明文化する規定も検討する」とありますが、そのようなことは議論されておらず、提言にも記載されていません。

2000年代初頭あたりの日本車は全体として秀逸なデザインが多い印象（好き嫌いの問題かもしれませんが） エルグランドもそうですが、 この頃の グランディス エスティマ レジェンド プリメーラ なども全然古さを感じません ただ単にモノフォルムデザインが好きなだけかもですが…

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

网友们真的太厉害了，这都能找出来……