
David L. Nash
3.2K posts

David L. Nash
@davidlogannash
Classical Christian School Teacher | Reformed Southern Baptist | Filioque Confessor | Postmill | Husband | Father | IC XC NIKA
Katılım Mart 2013
402 Takip Edilen179 Takipçiler

@brandon_d_smith If so, I agree with you, Heiser’s understanding of divinity/elohim is just plain wrong.
English

@brandon_d_smith Is the metaphysics issue that Heiser’s understanding makes divinity into a genus of which God is a species (the supreme species but a species none-the-less)?
English

I’ve been saying for years that theologies that include the divine council and divine mediatory figures are (1) not coherent with a biblical metaphysic, (2) drawn from a methodology that prioritizes extrabiblical sources over the Bible, and (3) far too Mormon-friendly.
Well, here’s a Mormon apologist using these ideas to support his polytheism. (It’s not quite right to bring Bauckham into this though).
English

@jenniferwilkin We should allow the Irish a pass to say things like, "Me potato is lovely".
English

@proginosko @facebook They have you confused with Steven Anderson.
English

This is truly bizarre. I tried to create a Facebook account yesterday. I kept getting a "confirmation error" message during the account creation process, so I gave up. A few hours later I got this email, with zero explanation.
What on earth is going on, @facebook?

English

@dgh5391 The answers to what this refers fascinates me. Since John warns his immediate, first century audience of it, it can't be a futuristic, final great tribulation. Since it hasn't started yet, it can't be an idealist, general tribulation all Christians go through.
English

🚨 COOLEST GIVEAWAY EVER! 📜
I am giving away one of @WesleyLHuff ’s P52 New Testament Manuscript Replicas.
Entering is simple. Just…
• Follow @JoshuaBarzon & @WesleyLHuff
• Like & Share the post
• Tag someone below
I’ll pick the winner a week from today on 4/17/26.

English

@dgh5391 @jesserandolph_ Exegesis is never done in a vacuum.
English

This is precisely backwards. 🔁 Theology is built upon exegesis, not the other way around. When building a house, you start with the foundation, not with the roof.
𝐌𝐢𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐞𝐥 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐨 ⛪︎ 🌲@MichaelCarlino
But someone will say, “You have theology; and I have exegesis.” Show me your exegesis without theology, and I will show you my exegesis by my theology.
English


@davidlogannash Sorry it is currently not very cheap. I got it on sale for 20 bucks last year.
English

Get a Jerusalem Cross necklace and you too can make liberals look like idiots.

evan loves worf@esjesjesj
Nazi shit
English

@PerGratiamDei @RHB_Books What’s the name of the book store near Myrtle Beach?
English

Haul.
3 from @RHB_Books for $3
The rest from a used book section of a Christian store in Myrtle Beach for pretty cheap

English
David L. Nash retweetledi

@MasonSCraig Either he is unaware that the creed isn't saying that Jesus descended into the lake of fire, or he rejects the descent/harrowing of hell outright. Either case, it's the ignorant fruit of biblicism.
English


@Stephen_Angliss You might want to read the creed in it's original language. Plus, in older English, hell was the name for hades/sheol.
English
David L. Nash retweetledi

There's nothing more stupid in the church today than evangelicals doing a play-acting "Seder Supper."
First, we don't need to do a fake Passover. The church already has the Lord's Supper which is (among other things) the fulfillment of the old covenant Passover. Jesus gave us a meal. Why do something other than what he commanded? Why do another religious meal when Jesus already gave us one?
The reason some evangelicals get interested is the Seder is that, having eviscerated the true sacraments of their meaning and efficacy, they go looking for substitutes. They have emptied the true sacraments (baptism and the Lord's Supper) of mystery, yet, being human, they still yearn for meaningful and mysterious rituals, so they either borrow from Jewish tradition (the Seder as a substitute for the Lord's Supper) or they create their own (such as the altar call). The answer to this longing for meaningful rituals should be satisfied by reclaiming and understanding what Jesus gave us. Doing a Seder is not a way to return to the church's roots; it is the church engaging in idolatrous syncretism, no matter how well intentioned.
Second, most of the Seder is not actually rooted in Scripture. It's not the ritual described in Exodus 12 or later OT Scripture. Most of it comes from later extra-biblical traditions; indeed, most of it comes from rabbinic Judaism, and was established long after Christian faith and Judaism were clearly distinct and very different faiths. Even if those rabbinic traditions get infused with Christian symbolism, they are not "our" traditions and symbols. They comes from the Talmud, not the Bible. Christians have no more business doing a Seder than than they do keeping Ramadan or celebrating Kwanza. The church has her own meal, her own traditions, her own calendar, her own story. Why borrow from apostate Judaism? Why syncretize the Christian faith with a rival?
I have argued elsewhere that one deep-seated reason dispensational evangelicals are attracted to modern Israel is because they have rejected Christendom but still long to have an earthy, embodied cultural manifestation of the faith. The same thing is happening here - having minimized the power of the Christian sacraments, these same evangelicals look to Judaism to provide what they (wrongly) think their own religion lacks.
Third, for Christians to try to perform an old covenant Passover in any way is virtually blasphemous - and it's impossible anyway. Will the Seder meal only be for the circumcised per Exodus 12, and those who keep the cleanness laws of Leviticus? Where are are Levitical priests going to be found to administer the ritual? How does taking this pseudo-Passover meal outside of Jerusalem get justified in light of Deuteronomy 16? How will a lamb be sacrificed at the temple, per the old covenant requirement, since the temple was destroyed in 70AD? Will 2 year olds be welcome to eat the Seder since the Passover meal was for the whole household and obviously included young children? What about the shedding of blood after Jesus' death on the cross - on what basis could any Christian revert to an animal sacrifice when the final sacrifice has been offered?
The Passover was part of a system that God ended in 70AD. To turn back to it (especially in rabbinic/Talmudic form) is no better and no different from turning to paganism (cf. Gal. 4:8-11). The whole point of the Last Supper is that Jesus has transformed the old covenant Passover into something better - the new covenant meal of the Lord's Supper. Doing a Seder is participating in a religious system that rejected Jesus as Messiah.
There's more that could be said, but these reasons are fully sufficient for Christians to reject the Seder. Do the meal Jesus gave us. Do it every Lord's Day, like the apostles did. Read Calvin on the real (Spiritual) presence and embrace a theology of sacramental efficacy. Use good bread and real wine. We don't need weird non-Christian rituals to give the season meaning.
English











