David Potes - retweeted over 8 times

It is diabolical that rent control is not means-tested. Rent control in SF is determined not by a tenant’s income, but by the building’s structure and the year it was built. Was it built before June 1979? It’s probably rent controlled. If Marc Andreessen or Garry Tan signed a lease in a duplex built in 1978, their landlord would not be allowed to increase their rent by more than 60% of Bay Area CPI/year (1.6% this year) Meanwhile, an elementary school teacher living in a single family unit built just two years later in 1980 can see a 40% annual rent increase. There are no rules against that! 1 in 5 rent-controlled tenants in SF pays less than 50% of market rent. No income analysis. No verification. No one even asks! We means-test food stamps. We means-test Medicaid. We means-test student aid. But the biggest housing subsidy in San Francisco? Yeah, we’re gonna base that one on whether your building was framed before or after June 1979. Unrelated: does anyone know why the rent is so damn high?

Finally fully moved to San Francisco! So excited for this next chapter!

At last night’s forum, Keisha shared why she’s running for governor to fight for YOU by: ✔️ expanding Medicaid ✔️ addressing the affordability crisis ✔️ creating a pathway to free technical and community college ✔️ eliminating state income taxes for teachers

0% state income tax for California families making under $100,000. That’s thousands of dollars back in your pocket where it belongs. As Governor, I’ll work the issue at both ends—lowering taxes for those who are struggling and raising them on the biggest corporations that can afford to pay.

0% state income tax for California families making under $100,000. That’s thousands of dollars back in your pocket where it belongs. As Governor, I’ll work the issue at both ends—lowering taxes for those who are struggling and raising them on the biggest corporations that can afford to pay.

0% state income tax for California families making under $100,000. That’s thousands of dollars back in your pocket where it belongs. As Governor, I’ll work the issue at both ends—lowering taxes for those who are struggling and raising them on the biggest corporations that can afford to pay.

0% state income tax for California families making under $100,000. That’s thousands of dollars back in your pocket where it belongs. As Governor, I’ll work the issue at both ends—lowering taxes for those who are struggling and raising them on the biggest corporations that can afford to pay.

0% state income tax for California families making under $100,000. That’s thousands of dollars back in your pocket where it belongs. As Governor, I’ll work the issue at both ends—lowering taxes for those who are struggling and raising them on the biggest corporations that can afford to pay.

0% state income tax for California families making under $100,000. That’s thousands of dollars back in your pocket where it belongs. As Governor, I’ll work the issue at both ends—lowering taxes for those who are struggling and raising them on the biggest corporations that can afford to pay.

Reminder that giving gavels out based primarily on seniority is not a law of nature - it’s a practice that was pushed by Reps like Clyburn. It punishes younger Members, who bring updated knowledge, new ideas, and energy, & favors safe seats over those who make majorities.