Dan Brehmer

@minhokim 100% - SODAX has the right architecture, partners, priorities, and experience to be the dominant platform for cross chain applications with real utility. And it is about to hit a scaling inflection point. Let's see it go!

This is why SODAX is positioned to win. SODAX is an open protocol designed to work with any chain, any CEX/DEX/AMM, and any GMP/bridge standard. SODAX doesn't compete with Axelar, LayerZero, or other messaging/bridge networks. It simply strengthens existing infrastructure. By eliminating liquidity fragmentation and reducing operational friction, SODAX creates a unified, optimized cross-chain environment without requiring anyone to rebuild or migrate away from what already works. SODAX further opens the entire ecosystem.

@MarioNawfal Why are you stoking outrage with deceptive posts? Please stop. You are not helping your country. this sort of post is actively damaging us as a nation. Please be better. x.com/i/grok/share/K…

🇺🇸 DEMS TO MILITARY: "DISOBEY THE PRESIDENT, TRUST US" A group of Democrat politicians who used to wear uniforms are now telling the actual military to maybe… not listen to their bosses? They dropped a dramatic video warning that “threats to our Constitution” are coming from inside the house. But here’s the twist: they didn’t name a single real-world order to ignore.! So now troops are supposed to guess what’s legal mid-mission? Imagine risking court-martial because Congress Dems are starving for attention. Source: Washington Examiner

@PatriotVerity @ericswalwell Grok admits it made a deceptive answer: x.com/i/grok/share/Y…

@ericswalwell x.com/i/grok/share/R…

Checkmate, Mr. President

@PatriotVerity @ericswalwell Grok confirms that Swalwell is only referring to the FBI investigative files in that statement, so the above post is deceptive. Please be careful about piling on when someone is trying to stoke your outrage... x.com/i/grok/share/i…

Build on SODAX Build on Sonic Build on!

@BrianRoemmele No way, man. You are going in an interesting direction, but that captures what it feels like to watch a video recorded in 1973, not what it felt like to be there. Our experience of reality was not determined by the quality of 1973 video recording technology or style.

The AI I am training for you will not just understand the images of an epoch, but also the “feel” of an epoch. I have 100s and 1000s of hours of contextual video that I also connect with real time context. Few understand why this is vital today and the future. This is 1973…

Verifying my clone(dbrehmer): personas.omi.me/u/dbrehmer

Woo! @BalancedDeFi gettin' some love on SUI! #poweredbyicx

With a foundation built over the last 1-2 years of consistent execution, ICON is ready for lift off. Hang on folks! 🚀

ICON Solver is 🔥! Check it out:

I’m all in to build on Sui Walrus! @SuiFamOfficial

Seamless access for developers to build with the latest technology from connected chains => A combinatoric explosion of innovation opportunity. Check it out, then Build!

@bryan_johnson No doubt. An endorsement for AG1 is a black mark against anyone who gives one. Thanks for showing the evidence and openly seeking and sharing the truth @bryan_johnson Really appreciate your work.

AG1 is an empty promise. Why am I poasting about AG1? To highlight the depths of our societal sickness. Insurance companies actively avoid being helpful. Government recommendations are lobby-led. Fast food is on every corner. Algorithms do with you as they please. The environment is polluted. Our food supply is dirty AF. The supplement market is a disaster. Where do we find refuge? AG1, a nutrition company, surely has your back? It promises “75 vitamins, minerals, whole-food sourced superfoods, probiotics and adaptogens” in one scoop. Meanwhile, AG1: + Pixie-dusting: providing a fraction of clinically effective doses + 49 out of ~70 ingredients (70%) have an unknown dose - that’s insane + 20% of your monthly AG1 payment ($16) goes to the influencer directly, and in perpetuity + After over fourteen years in the market, AG1 has done one small study looking at subjective feelings. Nothing measuring clinically relevant biomarkers. No medical doctors on their research team. This is about more than AG1. This is about companies leveraging clever marketing, paying authority figures (influencers) to parrot their talking points, and taking advantage of the individual to spend their hard earned money trying to navigate the gauntlet of our current Die society.

@ylecun @boazbaraktcs Genes may not have been the main driver for human evolution in the last few millennia. Consider how the ability to store, process, and propagate the most worthy memes drives our technological progress, as defined by Richard Dawkins and Susan Blackmore susanblackmore.uk/memetics/about…

Yes, I totally agree! AI systems will not be competing with us for the same resources. Obviously, their ultimate objective will not be gene propagation. Hence it won't be "survival" either, even as an instrumental objective. They will be designed to be in symbiosis with humanity,

Once AI systems become more intelligent than humans, humans we will *still* be the "apex species." Equating intelligence with dominance is the main fallacy of the whole debate about AI existential risk. It's just wrong. Even *within* the human species It's wrong: it's *not* the smartest among us who dominate the others. More importantly, it's not the smartest among us who *want* to dominate others and who set the agenda. We are subservient to our drives, built into us by evolution. Because evolution made us a social species with a hierarchical social structure, some of us have a drive to dominate, and others not so much. But that drive has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence: chimpanzees, baboons, and wolves have similar drives. Orangutans do not because they are not a social species. And they are pretty darn smart. AI systems will become more intelligent than humans, but they will still be subservient to us. They same way the members of the staff of politicians or business leaders are often smarter than their leader. But their leader still calls the shot, and most staff members have no desire to take their place. We will design AI to be like the supersmart-but-non-dominating staff member. The "apex species" is not the smartest but the one that sets the overall agenda. That will be us.

@aakashgupta Thanks for an excellent thread! Shows that Zuck underestimates Apple's formula. 1. Put high polish on the UX for a platform product 2. Launch with support of major partners 3. Succeed at the high end, build an image 4. Scale as costs come down Risky, but proven with the watch.

Summary - Zuck’s thoughts on Vision Pro: 1. He was as surprised as the rest of us 2. He called out how expensive it is 3. He made a dig on the solo usage 4. He called out the wire + battery 5. He didn’t see any new tech He’s basically saying, “It’s fine.” 🤦🏽‍♂️

🚨 LEAKED: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s thoughts on the Apple Vision Pro. He e-mailed this to the company. 1. The reveal was news to him as much as anybody:

Buidlers gotta Buidl! Keep up the good work!

@engineers_feed When the plane tries to take off and moves forward a little the wheels begin to turn and the conveyor begins moving. The plane does not move wrt the air, but all of the energy from the engines is deposited in the wheels and tires as friction. You can guess what happens next.

We should all get the same answer folks 💪🏼

nostr: npub1yccc4e2e2x6nfw6zmwa073kvkpxekwvl3yp7z5fgf8pfwq6z97mqukumxd

@jack @dylanleclair Any specific downside risks you have an eye on?

@dylanleclair far from it

Bottom is not in.

Hear about all the latest work happening in the Polkadot ecosystem directly from the builders in the REIMAGINE V13.0 conference going on now. Watch the livestream here - twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1… @REIMAGINE_2021 @helloiceworld @icenetwork_io #Polkadot