Deadalus4700

@_CryMiaRiver It’s hard to take seriously when you all use the same talking points about homosexuality but change the words. You rely on people’s fear of change and fear of being wrong to get away with it and that is just not right.

Many people in the replies to this have totally missed the point. The original post was about a 17-year-old with a “stable gender identity.” What that actually means is a young man who has always been extremely gender nonconforming and in this mad era has been told that means he has a “female gender identity” and is therefore a girl. Decades of research shows that extreme gender nonconformity in childhood is a strong indicator of homosexuality in adulthood. Of course most trans-identified men are heterosexual — autogynephilic to be precise. But for the kids sucked into this, most of the boys would grow up to be gay if they weren’t being chemically and surgically castrated. That’s where the phrase “trans away the gay” comes from.

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell Damn another person who thinks blocking people makes them right

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell It is not a fact, facts don't care about your feelings bud. Next time you are in a discussion keep your points concise, otherwise you come across as not having a firm point.

Homosexuality has been found in over 500 different animal species. Is that also not normal? Isn't normal defined as "being found in nature."

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell The definition you highlight is open to interpretation though for example what it means to be "normal" has changed over time, hence, it is not an objective matter.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell In linguistics, an objective definition is a well known definition that everyone agrees with - in other words, the definitions you see in dictionaries are objective definitions. Subjective definitions are slang and/or idiosyncratic definitions. You should stop now.

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell What is objective about that definition? Do you know what objective means? How can a “typical” guy have so many issues with understanding definitions?

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell No, that is actually the objective definition of the word. You live in a little woke bubble that is detached from the other 95% of the global population.

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell Actually I didn’t read your examples because you went on a massive irrelevant tangent that I didn’t care enough to sift through. Also it was about both as you called being gay mental illness.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell No, the overall conversation was about homosexuality and you derailed it in psychology. And again, many of those examples I gave was on psychology, but instead of addressing those you decided to have a hissy fit about the ones that aren't on psychology. FOYG

@0Tamahawk3 @maybe_ellen @alley_robin_ @One_Supernova @poz_woods I mean the same take could be said about decriminalizing homosexuality, you think straight people were happy sharing these spaces with gay people even though they are the same gender. You reuse old talking points without even realizing, quite fascinating.

@deadalus4700 @maybe_ellen @alley_robin_ @One_Supernova @poz_woods No, it's a simplistic take. You don't understand human nature; if you did, you'd see why ppl are exceedingly uncomfortable sharing certain spaces w/the opp. sex. You may not like it or agree with it, but so what? That's the way it is, & it won't go away.

"Talk to trans people" they say. "Then you'll understand. Then you'll stop being a TERF." Well, I tried. Operation #LetThemSpeak

@0Tamahawk3 @maybe_ellen @alley_robin_ @One_Supernova @poz_woods A popular opinion doesn’t mean a right opinion first of all. My view comes from what the research says and I attempt to ignore logical fallacies and fear mongering. But that’s just me I guess.

@deadalus4700 @maybe_ellen @alley_robin_ @One_Supernova @poz_woods Know what stance the world doesn't agree with? The stance that members of the male sex should have the right to use women/girls' locker rooms etc., but who cares if that doesn't fit your narrative?

@0Tamahawk3 @maybe_ellen @alley_robin_ @One_Supernova @poz_woods But just to tie it all together, for the case of criminality you are willing to expand your world view beyond biology. But, in the case of trans people you will solely focus on biology and disregard everything else. Is that an accurate take on your opinion?

@deadalus4700 @maybe_ellen @alley_robin_ @One_Supernova @poz_woods The notion of "convictions based on biology" doesn't make sense to me. Two things can be true at the same time: -I'm aware that testosterone plays a role in aggressive behavior. -The fact someone decided to commit a crime matters less to me than what influenced the decision.

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell A very broad subjective definition that you shape to meet your requirements. Like I said, you are so idolizing to such an insane degree and don’t see it as a problem but it’s not my responsibility to teach you that.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell No, I am normal according to the definition of normal and of norms. Normal - in accordance with norms. Norm - something that is usual, typical, or standard. In case you didn't know, woke idiots like you are only 5% of the population. Abnormal by definition.

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell The overall question was about psychology, you had to derail into into broader disciplines to prove your point instead of keeping it to psychology.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell No. It's not my fault you can't follow the conversation. You can stop now btw - you have already proven your ignorance on the topic.

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell You are normal according to your definition of normal. If you are ao egotistical that you think you are at the central of normalcy then I’m more than happy to leave you to your delusion. It’s not my responsibility to break your illusion.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell "....you are sad that your characteristics are not at the forefront of what's being shown and that makes you emotional...." All my characteristics are normal, and normality is in the spotlight on the forefront everywhere. Your whole movement exist because you are not included.

@Allomar_Nexus @ArielleScarcell Well when we discuss psychology and I ask for psychology examples and then you inflate your response with non psychological examples then yeah I’ll lose interest. If you feel the need to inflate your examples maybe you don’t have enough good examples.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell Me: "Academia has been infiltrated by woke zealots." You: "You got any examples....?" Me: <Give examples> You: "REEEEE that's not psychology". Yeah, that's why I said academia..... And some of it is on psychology, but you haven't been doing well on the psych bits so far anyway..

@0Tamahawk3 @maybe_ellen @alley_robin_ @One_Supernova @poz_woods If you believe this then why aren’t convictions based on biology, if it’s such an influential factor?

@deadalus4700 @maybe_ellen @alley_robin_ @One_Supernova @poz_woods Because it's extremely unusual for both to think & act the same under similar circumstances. I've never meant to suggest nurture doesn't play a role. I'm saying the innate differences between the two sexes--& human nature overall--cannot be ignored no matter how hard you try.

@YEGLeonidas @ArielleScarcell You're the kind of guy to be surprised when he finds out Dante didn't actually walk through hell. That's the level of understanding you are showing me right now.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell Again. Your assertion that foot washing meant sex pretty much voids anything else you have to say. You probably think there are ancient power plants under the Pyramids.

@YEGLeonidas @ArielleScarcell You are yet to disprove it. You think to literally to be able to truly appreciate the classics.

@YEGLeonidas @ArielleScarcell I think an important part of the classics is talking to others who have read the materials because they might have context that you are missing. Studying the classics doesn't happen in isolation its a conversation between people.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell You are saying I should Google shit when I have read the original materials and viewed the archeological sources and read the historical record. You're a soft brain who thinks Gemini or Grok has the right answer because you are too dumb to read.

@YEGLeonidas @ArielleScarcell You chose a terrible example, Icarus' fall is a metaphor. The story isn't that a boy literally fall from the sky and thats it. You are so illiterate its ridiculous.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell No there isn't. Icarus is a story of hubris. There is no hidden meaning. Most are about the risks of impiety. There sure as shit aren't any hidden sexual themes. You are inserting degenerate modern ideas.

@YEGLeonidas @ArielleScarcell Convenient for your argument no? You are so funny.

@deadalus4700 @ArielleScarcell Google has almost no reliable info on Classics. That's why you are stupid and confused. As I said, r/GayFeverDreams is not a reliable source.