Dan Brock

@Daddyu5li @OurOwnNation You can fire if you are pinned down and punches are raining down on you. That is a life or death situation.

@OurOwnNation He can not shoot unless the 🥷 has a gun u white people are the worst kind of people like a lot of my friends are white n they know the shit this nigga doing is wrong

This was self defense no matter what people try to say.

@LordJah0 @100moneill100 @therobbieharvey If his claim is that he disengaged from the altercation, then the original approach no longer applies. Self defense is re-activated.

@100moneill100 @therobbieharvey He admitted to the police that he approached the man in the first place he’s fucked 😂

NEW: According to a source who witnessed the Chud The Builder shooting, Dalton allegedly had his weapon drawn before any physical altercation took place. Remember this happened in front of police and may explain why the self-defense claim was never considered. Chud is being held on a $1.25 Million bond. He’s charged with attempted manslaughter.

@ReclaimD1 Why does she step in at the 6 second mark and look at him like that? Weirdo behavior.

The most embarrassing demographic known to man 👑

@UnkownStatistic @0hour1 Self defense is re-activated if the person disengages from the altercation. We don't know if that is what happened, or even if he provoked it.

@0hour1 He wasn't entitled to self defense with a gun in this case he provoked someone....

Chud is entitled to self-defense under the law. If he gets charged, it's up to his attorneys to prove that deadly force was appropriate. We have a justice system for these things. Public opinion doesn't sway courts. We wait and we watch.

@Pina682J @0hour1 Yeah, his streaming schtick is over permanently even if he gets a not guilty verdict.

@0hour1 Chud either has to change his ways or this will just keep happening. Karma is a bitch.

@jason_h_1776 @LaNativePatriot There was allegedly a scuff for the firearm. There wouldn't be enough time for the cops to do anything.

@LaNativePatriot Self-defense isn't thrown out the window. It's the disproportional act of defense, i.e., shooting outside a court with cops everywhere.

This case is about random people taking a personal grievance to what they hear you say online & using that as a justification to physically assault you It’s not about what he said, it’s about someone recognizing him in public & assaulting him for what they saw online If Chud gets convicted it’ll set a precedent for any online personality to be attacked if a random “feels” offended by your words & self defense to be thrown out the window, as long as the attacker “feels” justified What kind of commie shit is this?

@British_born_ @Rightanglenews Nah, he probably hasn't made much. I wouldn't be surprised if Kick kept his earnings.

@Rightanglenews This guy could definitely afford to pay $1.25 m bond, in full, outta his own pocket!!. He's probs made millions from his viral videos. He's done a fundraiser, to demonstrate that he has support. Racist or not, the guys making big money. This shooting is another payday to him.

BREAKING - Chud the Builder has successfully raised enough money to pay 10% of his $1.25 million bond to be released from jail.

@Elton3000 @ForgiatoBlow47 You can if they have you pinned down and are raining punches on you.

@ForgiatoBlow47 Law says you can't shot someone for punching you.

Getting called a slur doesn’t allow you to assault people! Do you agree

@JetherBlaise The sucker puncher should 100% spend time in jail and likely did.

violence over words is okay when the victim is black though, whites and asians were celebrating this all over this app

@ChefJamby @fudreaper_ I'm surprised there wasn't a single person watching that didn't record the stream. We should be seeing it.

@deadbeatuni @fudreaper_ No he did, I watched the whole thing live. Pump mods scrubbed the altercation almost immediately. Thats why there isn't any clips. You really think chud turned his stream on after being detained in a fight for his life?

THREE THINGS that very clearly demonstrate Dalton’s “Chud the Builder” self defense claims and why I think he’ll be found not guilty on the basis of self defense. A lot of people think this was another one of Dalton’s streams where he poses the “do you believe in free speech” gotcha question and then drops the N bomb on an unsuspecting minority. This is not at all the case, and it’s important in the context of his claim of self defense and whether or not Dalton PROVOKED the altercation. The first point is that Joshua Fox initiated contact. The story, as we know it so far, is that as Dalton was leaving the courthouse Joshua Fox recognized Dalton and starting pointing, laughing, and calling out to him. Joshua knew who Dalton was, recognized him in public, and made the initial move to invoke some sort of interaction between the two by taunting Dalton from across the street. Dalton then walked over to Joshua and, while we do not know the context of that conversation for certain, allegedly, Dalton only attempted to make small talk before Joshua told him to get on and to go away. This the second point - Dalton walked away. Dalton left Joshua, crossed the street back to the courthouse. At this point, the interaction was over and finished. However, Joshua Fox followed Dalton across the street and directly approached him. Then according to Dalton’s testimony, Joshua threatened Dalton by saying something to the effect of “I am a combat veteran. You’re not going to be saying all that “chimpin out” shit around me.” This is a clear verbal threat of physical harm. Dalton then says to Joshua, “Oh so you ARE chimping out?”. This is when Joshua punches Dalton in the face, knocks him onto the ground, and continues to strike Dalton. Dalton, 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥, fired shots, striking Joshua in the stomach and shoulder and sending another round into his own arm. The last shot further demonstrates the compromised position that Joshua had Dalton in and will undoubtedly be used as justification for Daltons fear of serious bodily harm or death. This was not “Joshua threw one punch and Dalton shot three times”. Dalton was sucker punched in the face and Joshua continued to assault him after being knocked down. This is exactly what George Zimmerman was acquitted for as continuing to be struck while on the ground meets the threshold for any reasonable person to believe that serious bodily harm was probable or that their life was in danger. This is when the video of the altercation begins, after the shots were fired, and Dalton wrestles a wounded Joshua over and down onto the ground. Cops break them up immediately after. This is when Dalton begins his stream on pump.fun. So, just to be explicitly clear: Dalton was not streaming, trying to provoke people to farm engagement. Dalton was simply walking out of the courthouse and was recognized by someone that had it out for him. Dalton WALKED AWAY. Joshua Fox FOLLOWED AFTER HIM. Joshua Fox assaults Dalton and continues to strike him after Dalton had fallen onto the ground. This is clear and decisive self defense. If it’s found to be not, it will just be another all too common blight on our Justice system.

@thedarshakrana Sounds like a load of bull shit to me.

Tibetan monks sit upright in meditation for days even after clinical death. And their dead bodies refuse to decay which breaks every rule of medicine. How? Thukdam It completely breaks the medical model of death. Tibetan monks enter this meditative state during the dying process. Their bodies remain fresh, upright, warm to the touch. No rigor mortis. No decomposition. No putrid smell. For up to 17 days after every cardiac monitor, EEG, and respiratory sensor confirms they are clinically dead. Western medicine defines death as the irreversible cessation of brain and cardiovascular function. The moment electrical activity in the brain stops, consciousness is gone. The body begins immediate decay. Cells start breaking down within minutes. The temperature drops. Muscles stiffen. Thukdam monks violate every part of that sequence. Richard Davidson at the University of Wisconsin has been documenting these cases for over a decade. Brain scans of Thukdam practitioners show organized neural activity continuing long after clinical death. Organized. Coordinated. Purposeful electrical patterns that correlate with deep meditative states. The implications shatter how we understand the relationship between mind and brain. If consciousness can persist and even direct bodily processes after clinical death, the brain cannot be the generator of consciousness. At minimum, consciousness operates through biological systems in ways that transcend current neurological models. At maximum, consciousness exists independently of the brain and uses the nervous system as an interface, a control panel, rather than its source. This connects to something neuroscientists have been quietly discovering for years: the hard problem of consciousness remains completely unsolved. We can map every neuron, track every chemical signal, stimulate every brain region with electromagnetic pulses. We still cannot explain how subjective experience arises from neural activity. Why there is an inner observer behind your eyes reading these words. Why you experience the color red as "redness" rather than just processing wavelengths of light. Thukdam suggests the hard problem is unsolvable because we have the relationship backwards. Instead of brain creating consciousness, consciousness might be using brain as a temporary biological vehicle. Death removes the vehicle but the consciousness that was operating it continues in a transition state. The monks who achieve Thukdam spend decades training their awareness through specific meditative practices. Shamatha, vipassana, and particularly the Tibetan practice of death meditation where practitioners repeatedly simulate the dying process to maintain conscious control as biological functions shut down. They are training to remain aware during the transition most humans experience as unconscious dissolution. What makes this especially disturbing for materialist neuroscience is that Thukdam practitioners can be predicted. Teachers who spend 40+ years in intensive meditation often enter this state. Novices almost never do. This suggests conscious control over the death process is a learnable skill that develops with practice. The same way you can train your body to run marathons or perform complex physical skills, you can apparently train your consciousness to maintain coherence after biological death. The preservation of the physical body during Thukdam implies consciousness was actively maintaining cellular integrity before death and continues to influence biological processes afterward. Decay is an active process involving bacterial growth, chemical breakdown, and loss of cellular organization. Something is preventing that cascade from beginning. Something operating outside normal biological control systems. Traditional Tibetan Buddhism describes Thukdam as the consciousness slowly withdrawing from the body in stages rather than departing instantly at clinical death. The practitioner remains in meditation within the corpse, gradually releasing attachment to the physical form. This matches what researchers observe: bodies that look alive but show no vital signs, maintained in meditative postures for days. Modern medicine treats death as a binary switch. Alive, then dead. Thukdam reveals death as a gradual process that consciousness can navigate deliberately. This opens therapeutic possibilities for end of life care that Western palliative medicine never considers. If consciousness persists during clinical death, dying patients might benefit from meditative guidance rather than just pain management. The deeper implications reach into fundamental questions about the nature of reality itself. If individual consciousness can persist independently of biological function, the materialist assumption that mind emerges from brain becomes untenable. Something non physical is operating through physical systems and can continue operating after those systems shut down. Thukdam forces us to consider that consciousness might be the fundamental substrate of reality, not an emergent property of complex matter arrangements. That every living being is consciousness temporarily expressing through biological form. That death is return to original nature rather than extinction of individual existence. Most people encounter this possibility as religious speculation or metaphysical wishful thinking. Thukdam provides measurable, documented evidence that challenges every assumption about consciousness, death, and the relationship between mind and matter. The monks sitting in meditation after clinical death are quietly conducting the most important consciousness research on Earth.

@ModisTomica @gate_captain @BagMan31814 @chairmanwon @fudreaper_ Yes, that is true. These specific points will be highly scrutinized in court. If they even have evidence of any of it. I don't think Chud was streaming at the time.

@deadbeatuni @gate_captain @BagMan31814 @chairmanwon @fudreaper_ I know, but that has to happen after the first approach. If that's how it happened then yeah, the first approach does not matter. But if it isn't, then the first approach does matter.

@WaverlyPlant @Clav0Updates Holy crap, he's 36? I thought he was in early to mid 50s.

@Clav0Updates I thought black didn't crack, dude is 36, looks like hes pushing 50.

Clavicular had to respectfully CHECK Adrien Broner after he started speaking CRAZY to him for no reason 😳 “You get in the middle cause you a b*tch ass n*gga” “I take care of you every time you come to my club… why you saying that to me after all I do for you” “You know you right Clav, you always take care of me…”

@ModisTomica @gate_captain @BagMan31814 @chairmanwon @fudreaper_ The thing is, none of this matters at all. What matters is if he walked away and disengaged from the interaction. If yes, self-defense is now re-activated.

@gate_captain @BagMan31814 @chairmanwon @fudreaper_ It matter if he walked over first if he was harassing him. If I walk over to you and you start harassing me I have no claim to anything. But if you walk over to me, start harassing me, then shoot me when I do something non-lethal about it, you are in the wrong legally.

@chairmanwon @fudreaper_ Yes, it is very close to the George Zimmerman case. Really it comes down to: Was he actually disengaged and walking away (self-defense reactivated), was he attacked while pinned? If yes, he will most likely be found not guilty.

Good post. The optics are different on the surface but this is a shockingly close parallel to the Zimmerman shooting. If he is on the ground being attacked,especially with concrete under him, that is absolutely deadly force territory. Stand your ground doesn't even enter into it. What will be really interesting to me in a trial is if his streaming is even allowed to be brought into evidence. First amendment protected activity in another time and place can't be brought in to try and invalidate a legitimate self defense claim. I agree with you. I think this gets dropped or he walks after a trial.

@ChefJamby @fudreaper_ I doubt it was streamed. There would be recorded clips everywhere. I think he only turned the stream on after the altercation when talking with the police.

@fudreaper_ Chud streamed the whole altercation. The stream didn't begin while talking to the police. For whatever reason pump scrubbed everything leading up to the when to police got involved. Details are slightly off but you have it right for the most part.

@goatlave2 @AldamsScott @PipeWhiteBabies Exactly. You have to move through life differently when you have things to lose. Why risk giving all that up over the comments from some random, irrelevant person? Call me whatever you want. I already have everything.

@AldamsScott @PipeWhiteBabies You’re willing to go to jail, potentially get fired from your job, and lose a bunch of money over what some random person says to you?

This chud the builder situation really highlighted the fact that right wingers/wignats can’t fathom the concept of fighting over words. Like, anybody with backbone , of regardless of race that I know IRL will get on your ass for saying disrespectful shit.

@LokiJulianus Yes, this will be a key part of the court case. If he was walking away and got assaulted, his right to self-defence would be re-established.

If it's true that that one dude was walking away when he was attacked, I don't think he gets charged with anything.

@billybrizzle420 It comes down to one thing: Was Chud pinned to the ground with fists raining down on him, and can he prove it? If not, he is going to jail.

The Chud the Builder case is going to be interesting Both parties who think it’s a slam dunk on either side of the spectrum are wrong On the one hand he does have freedom of speech & a word isn’t legal basis for an assault On the other there’s a massive case for him instigating conflict with the intent to cause physical harm This is going to come down to who he gets as a judge

@BroElfbar216769 @1776livefr38332 @webside5 @billybrizzle420 Fighting words would be like "I'm going to beat your bitch ass up right now". A racial slur is not a fighting word.

@1776livefr38332 @webside5 @billybrizzle420