BREAKING 🅱️:
Brazil, Australia, and Canada fined 𝕏, but it refused to censor users. Now the EU’s trying the same—𝕏 will stand for free speech.
Do you firmly stand with Elon Musk and his X team?
A. Huge Yes
B. No
IF Yes, Give me a THUMBS-UP👍!!
MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏
Trump and Albanese
I am absolutely Guttered that Trump said Albanese was a good Prime Minister.
A Prime Minister that is striping Australian citizens of all their rights.
A Prime Minister that is a communist 🚩 and in bed with Xi Jinping
Maybe Trump is part of the WEF
As of today, how would you rate your level of support for President Trump?
A. Very Strong Support (100%)
B. Strong Support (75%)
C. Moderate Support (50%)
D. Limited Support (25%)
E. No Support (0%)
New laws to control speech?
The new AFP Commissioner, Krissy Barrett, has made it clear that her top priority is “social cohesion.” She’s warned that individuals or groups who “cause hatred or fear” or “tear at our social fabric” are on notice and that the AFP “will be taking action.”
So who are these groups? Is it the Palestine protestors, Muslin clerics, Soverign Citizens, the NSN, or just you voicing your concerns?
It all sounds noble at first, but what does it actually mean. Who decides what counts as “hatred,” “fear,” or “disruption”.
In a democracy, disagreement and dissent are part of the social fabric. Policing emotion or perception is a dangerous road and history shows where that road leads.
When “social cohesion” becomes the yardstick for law enforcement, freedom of speech quickly becomes conditional.
One person’s “hate” is another’s “truth.” One group’s “division” is another’s demand for accountability.
Barrett’s comments might have been meant to reassure, but to many Australians, they sound more like a warning not just to “chaos agents,” but to anyone who dares to challenge the approved narrative.
1984 thought police, here we come.