Debbie👁️

17.7K posts

Debbie👁️ banner
Debbie👁️

Debbie👁️

@debbie_eye

Katılım Temmuz 2014
2.4K Takip Edilen450 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Debbie👁️
Debbie👁️@debbie_eye·
Pinning this cuz i have to relike it every day cuz “they” continue to scrub the likes off of it. Down to 249K as of this pinning
Tulsi Gabbard 🌺@TulsiGabbard

Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain. From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a ...

English
3
1
8
0
Debbie👁️ retweetledi
Eric Moutsos
Eric Moutsos@realericmoutsos·
The black pill has been fully digested. Thank you @RepThomasMassie for giving it your all.
English
571
1.6K
8K
66.9K
Debbie👁️
Debbie👁️@debbie_eye·
@RealJamesWoods Nah. The money will always decide. The only way he becomes president as if he follows the money rule
English
0
0
1
3
Debbie👁️ retweetledi
Eric Moutsos
Eric Moutsos@realericmoutsos·
Regarding AI, the CEO of Citadel said he came home “fairly depressed" for what’s on the horizon with this technology. Are you awake yet?
English
164
947
3.3K
43.6K
Debbie👁️
Debbie👁️@debbie_eye·
@EdGallrein Voting against the Iran strike IS America first. He did NOT vote against proof if cicizenship but against the house bill which had added other bills attached to it that he disagreed with. He didn’t vote for the govt to open because it was kicking the can to the next resolution
English
1
0
0
28
Clavicular Updates
Clavicular Updates@Clav0Updates·
Clavicular’s girlfriend was FURIOUS and started arguing with him outside of his club after he M*DE OUT with multiple girls 💀 “I don’t even know their names, but I love you so how does that compare?… You could leave if you want, but I love you” “Why would I leave you. I’m never leaving you” “Exactly”
English
1.3K
290
15.4K
965K
Debbie👁️ retweetledi
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
Walmart is selling you an unprofitable TV that watches everything you do and reports it back to their $6.4 billion advertising machine. And the TV literally won't turn on until you give them permission. This is one of the most sophisticated consumer surveillance operations in history and 150 million people walk into their stores every single week with no idea it's happening. Here's the full story: In December 2024, Walmart bought Vizio for $2.3 billion. Everyone assumed it was about selling more TVs. But it had nothing to do with TVs. Vizio's TV hardware business was actually LOSING money, posting a $6.7 million loss in its final quarter as an independent company. The advertising division made $115.8 million in profit that same quarter. Walmart bought 19 million living rooms - not a TV company. In March 2026, Walmart flipped the switch. Every new Vizio TV now requires a mandatory Walmart account before you can access any smart features. No account, no streaming apps. Without signing in, your TV is useless. The moment you create that account, something called Automatic Content Recognition activates. ACR runs silently in the background, taking screenshots of everything displayed on your screen and comparing them against a database to identify exactly what you're watching, second by second, across 700 TV networks and over 100 streaming apps. It knows what you watched, when you watched it, how long you watched it, and what you did afterward. Now here's the part that makes this genuinely unprecedented in the history of retail: Walmart ALREADY knows what 150 million Americans buy every week. They know your grocery habits, your clothing preferences, your pharmacy purchases, your financial behavior through Walmart Pay, and your location data from the app. But what they couldn't see was the 4 to 6 hours a day Americans spend staring at their television screens. By connecting your Walmart account to your Vizio TV, they've closed that loop. They can now prove that you saw a 30 second ad for gardening soil Sunday night and bought that exact brand at Walmart Monday morning. L'Oréal is already signed on as a launch partner for this kind of targeting. The math on this is just insane: Walmart Connect, their advertising arm, generated $6.4 billion last year with 46% year-over-year growth. Advertising runs at 70 to 90% profit margins compared to traditional retail's 3 to 4%. Their CFO admitted that ads and membership fees already account for one-third of Walmart's total operating income. The advertising business is now more important to Walmart's bottom line than entire product categories in their stores. And they're just getting started. Analysts calculated that Walmart's ad revenue currently represents only 1% of total sales. Amazon's ad business runs at 8% of sales. The gap between where Walmart is and where Amazon is represents roughly $50 billion in untapped advertising revenue. The Vizio deal is the bridge to get there. This is WHY they're selling certain TVs at a loss. When you break down the $2.3 billion acquisition across 19 million households, Walmart paid $121 per living room. A lifetime of behavioral viewing data from a household that also shops at Walmart is worth infinitely more than that. The cheap TV is a trojan horse. Vizio has already been fined $2.2 million by the FTC for secretly collecting viewing data on 11 million TVs without consent. The Texas Attorney General sued them for "spying on Texans." Walmart bought them anyway and made the surveillance MANDATORY. The company that built its empire promising everyday low prices is becoming the most powerful advertising platform in the world, and the TV in your living room is the entry point. What do you think?
English
301
2.8K
4.5K
424.1K
Big Brother Tea
Big Brother Tea@TheBigBroTea·
Out of all 50 seasons, what season of Survivor is the best rewatch? I want to rewatch a season of Survivor this week. #suvivor50
Big Brother Tea tweet media
English
124
5
327
42.7K
Debbie👁️ retweetledi
Greg J. Marchand MD
Greg J. Marchand MD@MarchandSurgery·
I'm a board certified OBGYN. I've practiced for 20+ years. Here's what's actually happening with mifepristone, because the coverage of it has been a mess. On May 1, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the FDA overstepped its authority in 2023 when it eliminated the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone and allowed the drug to be mailed. On May 4, the Supreme Court issued a temporary administrative stay restoring mail-order access while it reviews the emergency appeals from Danco and GenBioPro. That stay expired May 11. We're waiting on the Court. Let me say this clearly: I don't want mifepristone banned. Almost no OBGYN I know does. It has a legitimate place in our practice. What's being argued in Louisiana v. FDA is not whether the drug exists. It's whether the FDA's safety protocol "the REMS" should include the in-person dispensing safeguard the FDA itself required for the first 23 years this drug was on the market. Here's what an in-person visit does that a telehealth call cannot: 1. It confirms gestational age by ultrasound. Patients are not always accurate about their dates. They are sometimes weeks off. Without imaging, no one knows. 2. It rules out ectopic pregnancy. Mifepristone does not treat an ectopic. If you take it and your pregnancy is in your fallopian tube, the tube will still rupture. Women die from this. 3. It creates a local physician who is accountable when something goes wrong — hemorrhage, sepsis, incomplete abortion requiring surgery. A doctor in another state on a video call cannot manage a bleeding patient at 2 a.m. The 2023 REMS change removed all three. And here is the part the mainstream media will not tell you: it is entirely predictable that a partner, a parent, or a boyfriend will substitute themselves on the telehealth visit to spare the patient an awkward conversation. That means the person actually taking the drug may never be seen, never be examined, and never have her dates verified. If she is further along than she said, the outcome can be a severely preterm infant. This is a child who may live decades with profound disability, at a public cost in the tens of millions of dollars over a lifetime. This is why the FDA itself opened a safety review in September 2025. Real-world claims data is suggesting complication rates well above what is on the drug label. Secretary Kennedy and Commissioner Makary launched that review for a reason. Until it's finished, returning to in-person dispensing is the conservative clinical position. And by "conservative" I mean cautious. Careful. The standard of care. The Fifth Circuit didn't ban anything. It restored the same safeguard the FDA enforced under Clinton, Bush, Obama, and the first Trump administration. That's not extremism. That's medicine.
English
82
680
2.2K
67.4K
Debbie👁️ retweetledi
Murray Hill Guy
Murray Hill Guy@MurrayHillGuy1·
> be Spencer Pratt > grow up in LA > go to USC > become Brody Jenner’s menace friend on MTV > get cast on The Hills > steal Lauren Conrad’s friend > marry beautiful midwestern mid angel Heidi Montag > become the most hated man on TV > blow millions on fame, crystals and elite delusion > disappear for a decade > come back as a hummingbird conservative dad > LA turns into tents, crime and $22 matcha > everyone who hated you now looks insane > chad > run for mayor > somehow become the most normal guy in the race
Murray Hill Guy tweet media
English
353
992
19.7K
975.7K
Cosmic Kitten 🐈‍⬛💫
@TheKevinDalton Just the fact that all these problems not only exist, but are getting worse under decades of democrat control, should be enough to tell voters who to vote for.
English
2
0
7
160
Kevin Dalton
Kevin Dalton@TheKevinDalton·
A question about saving downtown Los Angeles from its current doom spiral ends with Spencer Pratt absolutely obliterating Nithya Raman for endorsing Karen Bass moments before deciding to run for mayor herself
English
489
673
9.3K
83.6K
Debbie👁️ retweetledi
Dustin Grage
Dustin Grage@GrageDustin·
🚨 LA MAYOR POLL: A whopping 88% say that @spencerpratt WON the Mayoral debate last night. Spencer Pratt: 88% Karen Bass: 7% Nithya Rama: 5% It wasn’t even close.
Dustin Grage tweet media
English
821
6.6K
43.6K
602.1K
War Correspondent
War Correspondent@warDaniel47·
🚨🔥 **HOLY SMOKES, AMERICA — THIS IS THE BOMBSHELL WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR!!!** 🔥🚨 DNI @TulsiGabbard just CONFIRMED on The Megyn Kelly Show that she’s leading a full investigation into Anthony Fauci for **alleged perjury** and his direct links to U.S.-funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab as part of the COVID-19 origins probe! Finally… **accountability is coming**. The truth about what really happened is about to explode! 🇺🇸💥 Here’s the **FULL video transcript** so you don’t miss a single word: ☑️Tulsi Gabbard:** “But the thing that we are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on, as well as Secretary Kennedy, is looking at the gain-of-function research that in the case of the Wuhan lab, as well as many others — many of these other bio labs around the world — was actually U.S.-funded and leads to this dangerous kind of research that in many examples has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.” ☑️Megyn Kelly:** “Let me ask you specifically… we already know that EcoHealth Alliance was partnering with this Wuhan lab to do gain-of-function research. We just have never been able to have somebody say, ‘And it was that exact experiment that led to this COVID bug.’ But have we gotten there? What’s the new thing you’re digging into?” ☑️Tulsi Gabbard:** “We are working on it with Jay Bhattacharya and look forward to being able to share that hopefully very soon — that specific link between the gain-of-function research and what we saw with COVID-19. I mean, that would be extraordinary. Because just so the audience knows, if it was Peter Daszak’s research with the Wuhan so-called ‘bat lady’ that caused this pandemic, then Anthony Fauci helped fund the thing he denied over and over and over to Senator Rand Paul… under oath. So is it any wonder that he sought a preemptive pardon… by President Biden before he left office? And then strong-armed and smeared people like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya — anybody who came out and said ‘I don’t know if that’s natural. This actually smacks of lab.’ And the reason why this is so important is not just what happened in the past, it’s because this research is happening in bio labs around the world… Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another COVID-like pandemic… But in order to protect the American people’s best interest, we have to bring about an end to it.” ☑️☑️This is **huge**, y’all. The American people deserve the full truth! Who else is fired up for real justice?! Drop your thoughts below and RT if you’re ready for answers! ☑️☑️
English
1.5K
11.6K
38.3K
864.9K
kathleen keirsbilck
kathleen keirsbilck@KKeirsbilc9584·
@MCarbonaraFL I have yet to find anywhere in America where Sharia Law is in effect. It is found in Mosques only and does not apply to Americans or non Muslims. Anybody know where a community of Sharia followers have made it law?
English
7
1
12
831
Michael Carbonara
Michael Carbonara@MCarbonaraFL·
🚨 WOW: FL has BANNED the oppressive Sharia Law statewide. Well done, Gov. DeSantis.
English
1K
8.2K
51.8K
472.2K
Goya Oxion
Goya Oxion@Will_KaBlock_U·
@MAGAVoice FUCK OFF CUNT! WHITE PEOPLE, WHAT DID BLACK PEOPLE DO TO YALL? YOU enslaved us. YOU tortured us. YOU murdered bloodlines and you still feel that we must suffer? Everything that this administration has done is make it clear that they hate black people so deeply. FUCK Y’ALL
English
317
3
39
15.7K
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
🚨BREAKING: Obama just came out very panicked after the Supreme Court said Districts being drawn on race is unconstitutional THIS IS HOW WE STOP THE STEAL KEEP GETTING LOUD
English
2.7K
9.4K
47.3K
949.4K
Frontierism
Frontierism@frontierism·
@IAPolls2022 As a lifelong Democrat, this is a fantastic idea. Kamala has the most support across the board and she’s the only one I trust to defeat the MAGAts. She has my vote!
English
25
1
121
3.3K
InteractivePolls
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022·
Harvard Harris: Dem Primary Crosstabs Black Dems 🔵 Harris: 71% (+8) 🔵 Newsom: 15% (-8) 🔵 Pritzker: 5% 🔵 Shapiro: 4% 🔵 AOC: 3% —— White Dems 🔵 Harris: 41% (+10) 🔵 Newsom: 26% (-6) 🔵 Shapiro: 11% 🔵 Pritzker: 10% 🔵 AOC: 7% —— Hispanic Dems 🔵 Harris: 50% (+13) 🔵 Newsom: 23% (+2) 🔵 AOC: 11% (-13) 🔵 Shapiro: 8% 🔵 Pritzker: 5% —— Asian Dems 🔵 Harris: 50% (-4) 🔵 Shapiro: 16% (+1) 🔵 Newsom: 12% (-7) 🔵 AOC: 9% 🔵 Pritzker: 0% Harvard/Harris | 4/23-26 | (+/- vs Mar)
InteractivePolls tweet media
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022

📊 2028 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES 🔵 Harris: 50% (+9) 🔵 Newsom: 22% (-4) 🔵 Shapiro: 9% (-1) 🔵 AOC: 8% (=) 🔵 Pritzker: 6% ⚪ Other: 6% —— 🔴 Vance: 48% (+6) 🔴 Trump Jr: 18% (-2) 🔴 Rubio: 16% 🔴 DeSantis: 9% 🔴 Carlson: 4% ⚪ Other: 5% Harvard/Harris | 4/23-26 | RV

English
314
186
858
1M