deebee_

@CredibleCrypto Reannouncing the announcement of the announcement. Wouldn't be crypto without it 😂

October 10th set me back on this project a bit- as I had set aside 6 figures to see it through but decided post 10/10 that those funds were probably better used to help me recover from that hit. But over the last few weeks I keep coming back to the idea (which is super exciting to me) and i've decided to push forward with it regardless. Won't be cutting any corners with this so it will take at least a year or more minimum- so don't expect anything soon- but when it's finally done I think it'll be worth the wait and I'm stoked to share it with you all when it's ready.

@NoelleInMadrid I don't really see the issue here. Ratcliffe has said his piece and Starmer has said what he thinks of it. Neither is saying the other should be silenced. Sounds like free speech in action to me.

if I didn't know better, I'd think that the prime minister of a country that says it champions free speech was publicly calling on a known figure to apologize for speaking freely but of course that can't be happening, 'cos free speech

@HypertraderAI @HypertraderAI Drop me a DM please and I'll send over my wallet address. Thx!

Due to a large number of community waking up and realizing they have missed the migration, We will be extending the courtesy window for 1 more week. What do you need to do? 1. Continue to hold your current tokens. If you sold your tokens post migration, you will not be eligible. 2. Send me a DM of your wallet address. 3. Join our TG to stay upto date! @StoicAdii @MigrateFun

@Crypto_inTUK @CredibleCrypto @CredibleCrypto I think you may have retweeted a fake account

@xydotdot Purpose is only important in as far as it brings happiness

What’s the ultimate goal of life?

@IamZeroIka Thanks for the reply dude - appreciate it. I'm still a bit clueless though. What would be a "hidden" level that's still "present in the charts"? Would data like liq heatmaps etc help "unmask" such things, but just not common for retail to use? Thx!

@deebee_ No it’s not about that data like liquidation heatmaps or CEX orderbooks, it’s about levels present in the charts which are, as said, hidden.

The market does not move based on consensus or popular opinion, it moves purely based on liquidity. While many people believe that collective sentiment, news, or fundamental analysis drive price action, the reality is that the market operates on a mechanism of liquidity seeking, where price moves to the areas that offer the most efficient execution for large orders. This means that regardless of how many people expect a price to go in one direction, if the liquidity is positioned elsewhere, the market will move against them. Liquidity is the foundation of price movement. Every transaction in the market requires both a buyer and a seller, and price can only move when there is an imbalance between supply and demand at a specific liquidity level. Institutions and large market participants do not chase price based on consensus, they position themselves where liquidity is deepest, ensuring that they can execute their trades without excessive slippage. This is why price often moves against retail traders: it is not about proving them wrong but about seeking out the liquidity necessary for large orders to be filled efficiently. Market consensus is often an illusion. When a large majority of traders expect price to move in a certain direction, liquidity builds up in the opposite direction in the form of stop losses and pending orders. Institutions use this to their advantage, deliberately driving price to these liquidity pockets to trigger stop hunts, force liquidations, and absorb orders before moving the market in the intended direction. This is why the most obvious trade setups, widely shared opinions, and strong retail trends often fail, because the real market drivers are looking for liquidity, not confirmation of public sentiment. Another key factor is that the market is algorithmic. A significant portion of trading volume is controlled by high-frequency trading firms, institutional algorithms, and market makers, all of which operate on liquidity-based execution models. These algorithms do not care about news, opinions, or predictions, they respond only to liquidity shifts. This is why price often seems to move in ways that defy logic or expectation; it is not responding to consensus but to hidden liquidity pools that are invisible to most retail traders. The market also moves in ways that ensure maximum liquidity absorption. Price does not travel in a straight line because doing so would leave large positions unfilled. Instead, it oscillates between liquidity zones, trapping traders on both sides to fuel the next move. This is why sudden reversals, stop runs, and liquidity sweeps are so common. These moves are not random but are designed to clear out liquidity before a true directional move begins. So yes, using news as confluence especially when the price reaches HTF key levels is often a good strategy, but invalidating trades just because “everyone expects this” is not a good take, in my opinion. A perfect example is Bitcoin during the FTX collapse in November 2022. Sentiment was extremely bearish, with everyone expecting a crash below 20K due to contagion fears. Bitcoin found strong liquidity around $15,500-$16,000, where institutions accumulated. Instead of continuing lower, price consolidated and then reversed, trapping late short-sellers.

@elonmusk You mean like the federal gov in the US? The country is literally called "the United States" ffs! The irony! In any case, layers of gov can be good or bad. Fallacy to say "govs of govs" are bad just because.

The European Union

@TheFlowHorse Take from a beginner on these things... People are looking for a safe haven. Theoretically, Bitcoin is a "better" gold, but when you want safe, you want tried and tested. For many, Bitcoin isn't that yet. Therefore, gold wins...for now. Crazy idea?

Gold hit 3k Calling Bitcoin digital gold at this point is both a lack of evidence based thinking and denial.

@donalt When I hear this kind of crap from Trump I can't help but wonder if Elon has been training him on how to try and shift the Overton window by saying crazy shit...

Not gonna lie anyone defending this orange turd at this point is just delusional

@ModernStoicAI They're likely using Screen Studio (Mac only)

Anyone know how to record videos like this!

@game_for_one Great post. The only bit I'm not so sure on is AI not being a substitute for intuition. Maybe not yet, but maybe not too far away? If intuition is essentially advanced pattern matching/weighting, isn't that a large part of what recent AI models do?

On Intuition in Trading Been involved and seen a few discussions around intuition in trading, so decided to collect some thoughts. Many traders I know, including myself, rely heavily on intuition—aka "gut feeling." But it’s not magic, and it’s not luck. Real intuition is built through time in the markets, real participation, and refining the ability to recognize patterns faster than conscious analysis allows. At its core, intuition is pattern recognition - your brain processing familiar market structures, sentiment shifts, and positioning cues without needing to break them down step by step. Early on, traders rely on System 2 thinking - slow, analytical, and methodical. Every decision requires conscious effort. But over time, System 1 takes over - recognition becomes automatic, allowing traders to react instinctively to conditions they’ve seen play out before. This is not guessing; it’s a refined internal process where the market just clicks. How Intuition Develops: Exposure and Real Risk Real intuition isn’t built from watching charts - it’s built from trading them. Seeing price move is one thing, but feeling the risk, pressure, and execution under real money is what solidifies instinct. A strong feedback loop is what refines intuition: 1) Exposure – Engaging with markets daily, reading order flow, recognizing sentiment shifts - but most importantly, putting real capital at risk. 2) Reflection – Reviewing past trades, breaking down what worked and what didn’t, and focusing on the process rather than just the outcome. 3) Adjustment – Adapting based on new information, reinforcing instinct so future reactions are faster and more accurate. Paper trading can help build structure, but without real stakes, it lacks the emotional weight needed for deeper learning. Pressure forces better execution; mistakes that cost money get remembered. Intuition is trained under stress, where decisions matter. Keeping Intuition Clean: Filtering Out Emotion and Luck Not every fast reaction is intuition. Emotional trading - driven by FOMO, greed, or fear - feels automatic too, but it’s not the same. Likewise, luck can disguise itself as instinct. A trader who catches a few big wins early without understanding why might assume they have a feel for the market when they’ve just been on the right side of variance. To refine intuition, traders need to: - Wait for structure – Even when a trade feels right, there should be technical or sentiment backing. - Recognize emotional bias – If emotions are high, decision-making is likely compromised. - Audit past “intuitive” trades – Did strong gut calls have repeatable signals, or was it just luck? Did bad trades ignore warning signs? - Keep intuition inside a system – The best traders still manage risk and position sizing, no matter how confident they feel. Why AI Won’t Replace This This is why AI won’t fully replace traders. Algos process data faster, exploit inefficiencies, and can execute with precision - but they don’t have intuition. They can follow a predefined model, but they don’t feel when positioning is off, when liquidity is disappearing before a move, or when the market is on the verge of shifting. Druckenmiller summed it up well in a recent interview: “I don’t think machines can take the place of humans when it comes to investing. But I think they can work as a co-pilot, and the combination can beat anything a mere human could be. So I don’t think pure machines - they’ll make money because they have a disciplined process and there’s math. But I think if you could find an intuitive investor who’s using AI and other things to supplement, I think that would probably be the top investor in the world, not a machine.” The best traders of the future will combine intuition with data-driven tools, using AI as a co-pilot rather than a replacement. AI enhances execution and processing power, but it’s the human feel - the ability to sense changes in sentiment, narratives, and positioning - that remains the edge.

@SalsaTekila The only thing that made it appear that way to me was Trump's response, but if you take that out, I think Zelensky was just being frank with someone doing the same. It wasn't even anything threatening or confrontational. A straight talker should respect a straight talker.

@elonmusk Will be interesting to see the wider context and lead up to this as this clip begins with Trump very much "litigating" the issue and Zelensky responding. I don't think it matters whether they're in the oval office or not - frankness works both ways

Watch this carefully. Very important.

@elonmusk If ANY president ANYWHERE can enact EVERY Presidential order EVERYWHERE, we do NOT have democracy, we have TYRANNY of the PRESIDENCY. Checks and balances my friend.

If ANY judge ANYWHERE can block EVERY Presidential order EVERYWHERE, we do NOT have democracy, we have TYRANNY of the JUDICIARY.

@docXBT @TheFlowHorse's predictions have been pretty accurate so far

Aight since clout is the only thing that matters to CT let's tally: Which accounts have openly called cycle top? Tbh I only saw it from Bluntz a few weeks ago, but haven't seen anyone on a Kole/Credibull arc. I also barely read my feed so I'm naturally ootl.

@TheFlowHorse For a moment I thought this was a nod to the people pressing the green button when all is red... then realised it had a much more profound meaning.

Shout out to all the brave men and women who run toward the fire over the last few days. Heart breaking stuff.

@milesdeutscher Sure, it's rising and will continue to, but 99% in the /near/ future? I doubt it

In the near future, 99% of transactions on-chain will be executed by AI agents instead of humans. If you think agents are simply a "fad", think again. The growth rate is astonishing.

@TheCryptoNexus Makes sense and is something I try do to too. It's generally bad to just blindly follow "experts" (see appeal to authority falacy), but taking their advice and trying to understand the "why" / taking it back to first principles is really powerful (but not always easy!)

Can think of it in a sort of mathematical proof way, you have ‘givens’ that you can use, provided to you by trusted people in the market that have a lot more knowledge and experience than you. Occasionally, something will happen that could not happen given something else (the given) was in fact valid, and so you discount it and then look to see why it was wrong. Idk having hard time explaining how i think about it dunno if this makes any sense

When I first started in crypto I quickly adopted the mindset that I should heed the knowledge and experience of others before my own, as I was a beginner and knew that I knew nothing. Served me quite well for a long time but occasionally I still find myself bending to others’ views on the market when I should be trusting my own proven instinct nowadays.

@CryptoGirlNova It's good that you add the disclaimer, but why make it as low-key as possible? You separate it from the thread, post it a few mins after, don't number it and don't explicitly say it's paid promotion / sponsored. Would be much more transparent to just be clearer and add it in 1/

1/ Heard of $MICRO before? This under the radar project is quietly making waves, and it might just be a game-changer for developers and investors alike. Here's why 🧵👇