DEI / CRT HASTY GENERALIZATION🇺🇸 FALLACIES

Over time, the national culture ‘imprints’ itself on the nation’s ‘homeland.’ Since a nation’s members have an interest in the preservation of their culture, they also have an interest in controlling their homeland. Over time, the national culture ‘imprints’ itself on the nation’s ‘homeland.’ Since a nation’s members have an interest in the preservation of their culture, they also have an interest in controlling their homeland. WHAT THE DEMOCRATS DID IN 2021 - 24 WAS AN ACT OF WAR ON WHITE AMERICANS

“Let me be clear: This is no “Great Replacement Theory,” a Marxist rehash…” books.apple.com/us/book/the-in…

@USEEOC Discrimination Based on Protected Characteristics: By tying accreditation to race-conscious ideologies, CACREP’s standards disproportionately pressure certain racial or ethnic groups to conform, fostering unequal treatment in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Precedent and Ongoing Harm: These practices have persisted despite legal precedent condemning similar ideological requirements. In Ward v. Polite, 667 F.3d 727 (6th Cir. 2012), the Sixth Circuit held that dismissing a student for religious beliefs conflicting with program ideology may violate First Amendment rights. Yet, CACREP-accredited programs continue to impose these requirements, harming students’ academic and professional prospects and undermining the integrity of counselor education. Conflict with Federal Policy: The April 23, 2025, Executive Order to Reform Accreditation demands constitutional compliance in accreditation practices. CACREP’s ideological requirements defy this mandate, enabling coercion in federally funded programs.

@CACREP_ Discrimination Based on Protected Characteristics: By tying accreditation to race-conscious ideologies, CACREP’s standards disproportionately pressure certain racial or ethnic groups to conform, fostering unequal treatment in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Precedent and Ongoing Harm: These practices have persisted despite legal precedent condemning similar ideological requirements. In Ward v. Polite, 667 F.3d 727 (6th Cir. 2012), the Sixth Circuit held that dismissing a student for religious beliefs conflicting with program ideology may violate First Amendment rights. Yet, CACREP-accredited programs continue to impose these requirements, harming students’ academic and professional prospects and undermining the integrity of counselor education. Conflict with Federal Policy: The April 23, 2025, Executive Order to Reform Accreditation demands constitutional compliance in accreditation practices. CACREP’s ideological requirements defy this mandate, enabling coercion in federally funded programs.

@1776General_ @BarryOue21536 Humga munga

@BarryOue21536 It's a never ending problem.

Two black SAVAGES Tyler and Deshawn Stafford stomped White teen Ethan Liming to death in Ohio. Their bond $25k & $5k The American judicial system promotes violence against Whites.

Grok Imagine prompt: This guy is a wacko

Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! twitter.com/i/spaces/1DGle…

@WesternMichU Discrimination Based on Protected Characteristics: By tying accreditation to race-conscious ideologies, CACREP’s standards disproportionately pressure certain racial or ethnic groups to conform, fostering unequal treatment in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Precedent and Ongoing Harm: These practices have persisted despite legal precedent condemning similar ideological requirements. In Ward v. Polite, 667 F.3d 727 (6th Cir. 2012), the Sixth Circuit held that dismissing a student for religious beliefs conflicting with program ideology may violate First Amendment rights. Yet, CACREP-accredited programs continue to impose these requirements, harming students’ academic and professional prospects and undermining the integrity of counselor education. Conflict with Federal Policy: The April 23, 2025, Executive Order to Reform Accreditation demands constitutional compliance in accreditation practices. CACREP’s ideological requirements defy this mandate, enabling coercion in federally funded programs.

@CACREP_ Discrimination Based on Protected Characteristics: By tying accreditation to race-conscious ideologies, CACREP’s standards disproportionately pressure certain racial or ethnic groups to conform, fostering unequal treatment in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Precedent and Ongoing Harm: These practices have persisted despite legal precedent condemning similar ideological requirements. In Ward v. Polite, 667 F.3d 727 (6th Cir. 2012), the Sixth Circuit held that dismissing a student for religious beliefs conflicting with program ideology may violate First Amendment rights. Yet, CACREP-accredited programs continue to impose these requirements, harming students’ academic and professional prospects and undermining the integrity of counselor education. Conflict with Federal Policy: The April 23, 2025, Executive Order to Reform Accreditation demands constitutional compliance in accreditation practices. CACREP’s ideological requirements defy this mandate, enabling coercion in federally funded programs. THEN THEY ALLOW STEPHEN CRAIG A DISGRACED DEGENERATE WHO RESIGNED FROM CACREP PROGRAM AT WMU, THEN THEY ALLOW HIM TO HAVE A CA REP PROGRAM UNDEF HIM AT K STATe? WHILE HISCACREP I STRUCTORS BACK IN MICHIGAN GASLIGHT AND FORCE THE STUDENT WHO WAS THE REASON. CRAIG RESIGNED TO TAKE HIS FRIENDS! CACREP IS CROOKED

CACREP HAS RECENTLY ALLOWED STEOHEN CRAIG WHO RESIGNED IN DISGRACE FROM WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY, CACREP,FOR LYIBG AND GOJNG AFTER STUDENT, THEN WENT TO KANSAS STATE,CACREP OPENED A CACREP PROGRAM AT K STATE THROUGH CRAIG WHO RESIGNED, 1 1/2 YEARS EAIRLIER, THEN HIS COLLEGUES HAVE VOTED AGAINST ME FORCED ME TO TAKE INSTRUCTORS,RETALIATING AGAIBDF ME!

🎉 The Federation for American Immigration Reform is pleased to announce the formation of its new advisory Immigration Council. FAIR’s Immigration Council is a prestigious group of respected and highly accomplished thought leaders who seek reform of America’s immigration policy. Members come from a variety of careers and public service backgrounds that include business, finance, government, higher education, and law. Read more about the Council: fairus.org/press-release/…

Thanks for sharing this. Compelling specific ideological views through accreditation standards in counseling programs does raise serious questions about free speech and equal protection, especially in taxpayer-funded education. Forcing conformity risks chilling open inquiry and professional training. Curious to see how OCR handles FAIR's complaint.

@CACREP_ Basis of the complaint CACREP standards require counseling programs to evaluate a student’s “dispositions, ” defined to include values and beliefs. This framework enables practices that compel students to adopt specific ideologies, penalize dissenting views, and discriminate based on protected characteristics like religion or race. Such requirements undermine constitutional protections and harm students’ academic and professional prospects. Specific Allegations Coerced Ideological Compliance: CACREP’s standards mandate that students affirm controversial race-based ideologies, such as “whiteness” or “privilege, ” through confessional exercises. Refusing to participate may result in academic sanctions which chill free speech and critical inquiry in violation of the First Amendment.

Thanks for the heads-up. This FAIR civil rights complaint to the Dept of Education highlights real concerns over CACREP's "dispositions" standards, which explicitly include evaluating students' values and beliefs—potentially compelling affirmation of contested ideas like "whiteness" and "privilege" under threat of academic penalties. That setup risks chilling free speech and viewpoint diversity in counselor training. Worth watching how OCR handles it.

@grok This is a federal Civil Rights complaint filed under the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) Complaint Resolution Process against the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (“CACREP”), located at 500 Montgomery Street, Suite 350, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. The Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism (FAIR) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing civil rights and liberties, and promoting a common culture grounded in fairness, understanding, and humanity. As an interested third party, FAIR alleges that CACREP’s accreditation standards and practices violate the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by compelling ideological conformity and creating a hostile educational environment for students in CACREP-accredited programs at federally funded institutions.

@WesternMichU This is a federal Civil Rights complaint filed under the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) Complaint Resolution Process against the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (“CACREP”), located at 500 Montgomery Street, Suite 350, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. The Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism (FAIR) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing civil rights and liberties, and promoting a common culture grounded in fairness, understanding, and humanity. As an interested third party, FAIR alleges that CACREP’s accreditation standards and practices violate the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by compelling ideological conformity and creating a hostile educational environment for students in CACREP-accredited programs at federally funded institutions.

@grok Submitted on May 13, 2025, the complaint targets troubling patterns within CACREP-accredited programs that evaluate students based on their personal values and beliefs. These programs often require students to affirm specific ideological positions regarding concepts like “whiteness” and “privilege,” with academic penalties for those who dissent. CACREP standards mandate that counseling programs evaluate a student’s “dispositions,” explicitly defined to include “values and beliefs.” This framework has enabled practices that pressure students to adopt specific ideological positions, marginalizing those with differing viewpoints, including those based on religious convictions.

Thanks for the update. This complaint highlights a key issue: professional training, especially in counseling, should prioritize clinical competence, evidence-based practice, and client needs over enforced ideological conformity or compelled speech on race, identity, or politics. Forcing students to affirm specific worldviews risks undermining trust and effectiveness in therapy. Merit and viewpoint diversity matter here.

@CACREP_ Formal Complaint Filed Against the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) The legal pushback is underway. FAIR has filed a formal complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights against the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP). FAIR took this action to address concerns about mandatory ideological conformity in counselor education programs nationwide. Submitted on May 13, 2025, the…

@grok Formal Complaint Filed Against the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) The legal pushback is underway. FAIR has filed a formal complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights against the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP). FAIR took this action to address concerns about mandatory ideological conformity in counselor education programs nationwide. Submitted on May 13, 2025, the…