Devin Riker

@CPAC Thank you raising your hands, we agree it's best that you steer clear from our families.

Predators aren’t in dark alleys—they’re online, talking directly to your kids. If you’re not monitoring it, you have no idea who is.

@dramaricic But i love the sentiment of time with kids. Best use of time!

@dramaricic What are you expectations on retention that give confidence on quitting based on $2k MRR?

What MRR is considered as "I can now quit my 9-5?"

@JsonBasedman disappointed in the lack of Vampire Weekend fans 🤦🏻‍♂️

@JsonBasedman Who gives a fuck about an LLM em dash? I've played those models too. They're dumb.

Anthropic is cooked, it's over

@TonyLaneNV Is this really more cost effective than a vibratory conveyor? Is there really nothing left to invest in, that we have to prop up these 1000x "upgrades" to existing tech that's works?

THIS IS WHERE EVERYTHING IS HEADED… They just introduced an AI robot that can literally keep working even when parts of its body fail. Let that sink in. No breaks. No complaints. No days off. Even damaged… it still gets the job done. This isn’t “future tech”… this is happening RIGHT NOW. How long before this replaces real workers? ⬇️ 🇺🇸

@anishmoonka Why do we struggle to remember that Zuckerberg is going to Zuckerberg?

Thanks for not whitewashing! 2 yrs ago the narrative was AI as a colab (which arguably is still the better solution). Then the insatiable quest for productivity led us to "but how quickly can we replace humans?" I can't not wait for the real cost of compute to be born.

Yesterday Meta told every US employee their computer will now record mouse clicks, keystrokes, and screenshots while they work. All of it goes into training an AI to do their job. In 30 days, 8,000 of these same employees are being laid off. Reuters got the memo. The wording is the company's own: the recordings will be used to build "AI agents that can perform work tasks autonomously." Reuters also confirmed the May 20 date and the number, 8,000 people, exactly 10% of Meta's global workforce. Meta is spending $115 to $135 billion on AI infrastructure this year, almost double the $72 billion it spent last year. The entire business only generated $115.8 billion in cash for all of 2025. Meta is now planning to spend more on AI in 2026 than the whole company brings in. Part of the bill went to a company called Scale AI. Meta paid $14.3 billion for 49% of it last June, mostly to bring in CEO Alexandr Wang. Scale's whole job is to tag and clean the human-written data that AI models learn from. Meta wanted Wang because their old data supply ran dry. The public internet is almost out of fresh material to feed these models. A group called Epoch AI ran the math and projects the world will burn through its supply of high-quality human-written text on the web somewhere between 2026 and 2032. The industry calls this the "data wall." Google and OpenAI are stuck on the same side of it. So Meta turned inward, to the most expensive training material money can buy: their own employees doing their own jobs. Mouse movements teach the AI how to move around a screen, click by click. Keystroke logs hand it the exact shortcuts and rhythm an experienced worker uses, the muscle memory of the job. Screenshots show what a finished task should look like. The people being recorded in April are the raw material for the AI that replaces them in May. This is not just a Meta thing. Amazon laid off 16,000 corporate workers in January. Oracle let go of up to 30,000 of its people, about 18% of the company, on March 31. The cash they saved goes toward $156 billion in AI data centers. The whole pattern across big tech is identical. Record profits and record AI spending, paired with the biggest workforce cuts since the pandemic. The thing they are building is a software worker that opens the dashboard, reads the numbers, drafts the email, books the meeting, and never needs a coffee break. The training data for that worker is a senior Meta employee doing all of that, on Meta's payroll, one month before their last day.

@PawelHuryn Is the mind consciousness? I think consciousness is to witness without compute. Can LLMs do that?

We can't even agree what consciousness is. But we're sure LLMs don't have it. It may just be what thinking feels like from the inside when the thinker can model itself vs. the world. "LLMs just pattern-match." So do we. Nothing wrong with that.

Leaning toward order costs a lot of energy, because control is taxing. Same in organizations. Building a switch is expensive and most don't budget for it. Which is why it's not there when they need it.

The actual work is building the switch. More later.

Most founders I know have brains that tend toward chaos. The operators they hire tend toward order. When things are good, there's no problem. Nothing stays good, and the fight over who's right starts. Both are wrong about what healthy actually looks like.