Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Haro
3.9K posts
Haro
@diegoharo0
mi nueva canción esta en el link de abajo 👇🏻
Torreón, Coahuila de Zaragoza Katılım Temmuz 2012
496 Takip Edilen403 Takipçiler
Haro retweetledi
I fell down a rabbit hole reading the latest Avi Loeb et al. paper and I can't shake it.
It's about the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, and it lays out a series of "coincidences" so statistically bonkers that they start to look like a plan.
A very, very smart plan.
🧵
So, 3I/ATLAS is the 3rd interstellar object we've ever seen. It's currently cruising through our solar system.
Most people assume it's a comet or asteroid from another star. Cool, right?
But the paper (by Hibberd, Crowl & Loeb) points out a few things that are just... off.
First, its orbit. It's retrograde (going the "wrong way" around the sun) but it's almost perfectly flat on the same plane as all the planets.
The odds of that happening by chance? About 0.2%.
It's like throwing a frisbee backwards across a highway and having it fly perfectly level with the cars.
Why does that matter?
The paper notes this specific orbit is TERRIBLE for us if we wanted to send a mission to it. The speeds are all wrong.
But for the object itself? It's the perfect angle to survey our entire solar system and line up shots with the planets.
Okay, weird orbit, maybe just a fluke.
But then there's the object itself. If it's an asteroid, it's ~20km wide. We should see way, way more small ones like 'Oumuamua before we see one this big. It's like finding a blue whale before you've ever seen a goldfish.
And it has no comet tail. No outgassing. It's just... dark.
But here's where it gets genuinely wild.
The trajectory of 3I/ATLAS takes it surprisingly close to Venus, Mars, AND Jupiter.
The authors calculated the probability of a random object having all three of these near-perfect alignments.
The odds are less than 0.005%.
(I had to read that number twice. It's not a typo.)
Okay, I know what you're thinking. "Aliens? Really?" I did too, but stick with me.
The paper explores the hypothesis that these aren't coincidences. They're features.
It argues this isn't a rock; it's a probe following a carefully planned route.
The paper even brings up the "Dark Forest" theory (if you know, you know).
The idea that any smart civilization would stay quiet or eliminate potential threats.
So the probe's path isn't for a friendly hello. It's for reconnaissance. And maybe more.
Plot twist: On Oct 29, 2025, 3I/ATLAS will reach its closest point to the sun.
And at that exact moment, it will be perfectly hidden from Earth, directly behind the sun.
The paper points out this is the ideal time to do a massive braking maneuver to get captured into our solar system... completely in secret.
Imagine you're designing a stealth probe.
You'd come from a direction that's hard to see (the bright galactic center ✓).
You'd pick a path that makes interception impossible (that weird orbit ✓).
You'd line up your targets in advance (the 0.005% flybys ✓).
And you'd hide your biggest move (the solar eclipse ✓).
It all... clicks.
The paper makes a testable prediction. If this is a probe with malign intent, it could launch something to intercept Earth.
The optimal arrival window? Late November to early December... 2025.
So, yeah. Mark your calendars, I guess?
The authors are clear this is a "pedagogical exercise."
The most likely answer is still "weird comet."
But the math is sound, and the argument is chillingly elegant. It's a perfect example of how you can build a terrifyingly plausible case out of a few statistical outliers.
And it makes you wonder... what else have we written off as just a coincidence?
English