dima

2.1K posts

dima

dima

@dimitry12121

Olanda Katılım Kasım 2019
129 Takip Edilen99 Takipçiler
Mat
Mat@MTradingX·
@dimitry12121 @manuelson_ @Market_Emotions @TradersYard E8 doesnt have that on 2 step, and 1 step only drawdown is configurable plus payout split Fundedelite only has max drawdown and profit split and leverage. Each firm does offer certain unique traits that others don't that's the beauty of this industry
English
1
0
0
15
MarketEmotionsFX 📉
MarketEmotionsFX 📉@Market_Emotions·
Saw this at @TradersYard, looks quite interesting. Has anyone built their own challenge yet or traded here? Might give it a go over this week 👀 With my bad luck streak, I got nothing to lose anymore 😅😂
MarketEmotionsFX 📉 tweet media
English
7
2
21
752
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@Adam_Aabaad @MyForexFunds Maybe if Pakistani stopped scamming so much, pro firms could ease their rules or whitelist them
English
0
0
1
60
Banjara
Banjara@Adam_Aabaad·
Active Firms would complain they don't get traders while their existing traders would be waiting for payouts for months while @MyForexFunds paying traders after rising from death. There is a lesson to learn if somebody wishes to learn one.
English
6
11
54
2K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@PerseusMMXM @the5erstrading Oh ye Indians prefer to side with a random Indian than a company with over 100k clients operating since 10 years 🤣
English
0
0
1
160
Perseus
Perseus@PerseusMMXM·
At this point of time I've started feeling like we won't have many options to trade with in the future. Firms like @the5erstrading have started delaying payouts and even terminating accounts for absolutely no reason. I've a pending payout too with a firm I can't name and my account is also terminated. 🫠
Sunil K.@Trader_sk09

Ever heard of a prop firm terminating a trader’s account just for speaking up about their issues? New low set by @the5erstrading Payout request date on 02/05/2026 — but right before the payout date, my funded account was terminated with zero proper explanation. Do better.@the5erstrading Silence from affiliates and managers only makes it worse,they should shove their head in mud. Easily one of the most frustrating experiences with a prop firm. And this doesn’t end here,more scrutiny on the way @the5erstrading get ready.

English
6
0
28
5.7K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@vedictrades The trader has the right, same as the company has the right to terminate you, especially when it’s clearly specified in the contract. You monkey
English
0
0
0
67
Sahil
Sahil@vedictrades·
A trader has the right to call out the firm if his payout has been delayed. The only reason I did not speak up before was because I thought it’s just a delay due to compliance issues. But terminating an account because they spoke up is bs. Selling services? Boy that’s such a dumb take. I should’ve been banned from every single futures firm for sharing how I risk to pass my evaluations or manage the risk. Affiliates are supposed to help tell people how THEY do things and that’s WHY they prefer the X firm. This payout delay is not an isolated event now. Multiple people on my feed have tweeted about it. Being a legacy firm does not mean you get to get away with this. Do better.
Maya Ivgy@MayaIvgy

We believe that You are using your Account for any commercial or marketing purposes (including but not limited to selling services based on teaching others how to pass the Evaluation stage), or makes any defamatory statements or publishes harmful content about the Company or the Services, including, without limitation, the unauthorized disclosure or publication of email correspondence or other private communications with the Company.

English
10
6
62
7.1K
RAJ
RAJ@rraytradess·
Respect the work you’ve put @stoictrader08 into building @the5erstrading community it shows. But this needs attention. The Indian trading community is watching closely, and moments like this define trust. One of our own is waiting on a payout, and it’s important this gets resolved cleanly and quickly. Let’s not let a situation like this raise doubts where clarity should exist. Do the right thing. 🤝
Sunil K.@Trader_sk09

Ever heard of a prop firm terminating a trader’s account just for speaking up about their issues? New low set by @the5erstrading Payout request date on 02/05/2026 — but right before the payout date, my funded account was terminated with zero proper explanation. Do better.@the5erstrading Silence from affiliates and managers only makes it worse,they should shove their head in mud. Easily one of the most frustrating experiences with a prop firm. And this doesn’t end here,more scrutiny on the way @the5erstrading get ready.

English
7
2
50
5.8K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@salmanmunir96 This guy is completely out of his mind. He is using match prime service that offers a-book for prop firms as long as they cover the drawdown 1:1,he is not even trying to do some work and find the good traders.He is just making everyone overpay so they are covered by a third party
English
0
0
0
64
Salman Munir
Salman Munir@salmanmunir96·
If you go with this garbage. You pay $500 for no reason, the evaluation has no purpose but to make a dent in your wallet. The account is trailing dd, requirements make no sense. You pay $4000 'activation' fee. All your funded traders are simply sized down by 2.5x, if you place 10 lots the LP receives 4 lots. When you make 10k profit, the 4k deposit goes to 8k (100% DD to Profit ratio). You only get 7k out of it since DD is trailing. They keep 1k on top, even after the stupid $500 eval fee. Alternate scenario, rather than giving them $500 you can double your $500 without any limits or rules or min day. That's $1000 in WITHDRAWABLE cash. Deposit $4000 more and double the account again. That's $10,000 instead of $7000. This 'firm' has no risk or any input and when you throw in a dealing desk they'll just make fuck ton of money from YOUR MONEY. Don't be a dumb tool to go with this lame idea. If you do then maths truly isn't your stronghold.
Stan FTPrime.com || FundingTraders.com@StanFXTrading

Today I'm launching something I should have built years ago. FT Prime. A-book execution. For traders who've already proven it. If you've traded prop long enough, you know the pattern. Pass the challenge. Get funded. Start pulling consistent numbers. Then the friction starts. Delays, reviews, rule interpretations that didn't exist when you signed up. Every firm in this space, major or minor, has a list a mile long of traders who got denied, stuck in review indefinitely, or banned outright the moment they became consistently profitable. Some with legitimate cause, many without. It's an industry-wide story, and enough traders have lived it that it barely needs explaining anymore. Most prop firms run a B-book. Plain English: your trades never touch real markets. They're simulated internally and act as signals the firm could copy to live accounts but most never do. They collect challenge fees and move on. The model works fine when traders lose. When traders win consistently, the economics get complicated. That tension is baked into the structure - it's not a bug. FT Prime runs a different model. We work with a regulated Liquidity Provider who takes your positions live which means real execution, real fills, real P&L. Not a demo. Not a mirror. Your orders flow to live markets exactly the way they would with any institutional broker. The LP executes them and returns your profit or loss directly. No internal book. No conflict of interest. And because your P&L flows through the LP, there are no payout denials. No risk management reviews standing between you and your money. What you made is yours. We take our share, you take yours, and there's no internal process that can change that. Every funded account has real capital behind it. That's why this costs more. We have skin in the game on every account we activate. That's the structure as it should be. We both put money on the line and split the profits, with the majority going to the trader whose skill made them possible. 95% of our revenue is profit-share. We only win when you win. Here's how it works: ▪ $500 evaluation on a $100K account - simulated at this stage only, to verify the skill is there ▪ 10% target, 3% daily drawdown, 10% max loss ▪ Pass and pay the $4K activation - this is the moment everything goes live Real capital, real execution, real markets. This isn't our profit. It's the cost of putting your trades in front of a regulated LP. ▪ 70% split default, scaling to 85% ▪ Weekly payouts This is for the trader pulling consistent five-figure months who's started noticing the friction. FT Prime is built for that stage - where your consistency is an asset, not a problem. ftprime.com

English
5
0
32
6.4K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@StanFXTrading AHHAHAHAHA you are basically using match prime service without even putting some skin in the game? The require 1:1 deposits based on account daily drawdown 🤣 so you are profiting still 500usd for every challenge sold and the activation fee pays for match prime 🤡
English
0
0
2
51
Stan FTPrime.com || FundingTraders.com
Today I'm launching something I should have built years ago. FT Prime. A-book execution. For traders who've already proven it. If you've traded prop long enough, you know the pattern. Pass the challenge. Get funded. Start pulling consistent numbers. Then the friction starts. Delays, reviews, rule interpretations that didn't exist when you signed up. Every firm in this space, major or minor, has a list a mile long of traders who got denied, stuck in review indefinitely, or banned outright the moment they became consistently profitable. Some with legitimate cause, many without. It's an industry-wide story, and enough traders have lived it that it barely needs explaining anymore. Most prop firms run a B-book. Plain English: your trades never touch real markets. They're simulated internally and act as signals the firm could copy to live accounts but most never do. They collect challenge fees and move on. The model works fine when traders lose. When traders win consistently, the economics get complicated. That tension is baked into the structure - it's not a bug. FT Prime runs a different model. We work with a regulated Liquidity Provider who takes your positions live which means real execution, real fills, real P&L. Not a demo. Not a mirror. Your orders flow to live markets exactly the way they would with any institutional broker. The LP executes them and returns your profit or loss directly. No internal book. No conflict of interest. And because your P&L flows through the LP, there are no payout denials. No risk management reviews standing between you and your money. What you made is yours. We take our share, you take yours, and there's no internal process that can change that. Every funded account has real capital behind it. That's why this costs more. We have skin in the game on every account we activate. That's the structure as it should be. We both put money on the line and split the profits, with the majority going to the trader whose skill made them possible. 95% of our revenue is profit-share. We only win when you win. Here's how it works: ▪ $500 evaluation on a $100K account - simulated at this stage only, to verify the skill is there ▪ 10% target, 3% daily drawdown, 10% max loss ▪ Pass and pay the $4K activation - this is the moment everything goes live Real capital, real execution, real markets. This isn't our profit. It's the cost of putting your trades in front of a regulated LP. ▪ 70% split default, scaling to 85% ▪ Weekly payouts This is for the trader pulling consistent five-figure months who's started noticing the friction. FT Prime is built for that stage - where your consistency is an asset, not a problem. ftprime.com
English
19
4
34
1.3M
dima retweetledi
Mat
Mat@MTradingX·
😂 I am sorry but I had to call this out onto a post. Please do not believe this A-book bullshit. It does not work, I have seen millions of data points and on average there is around 5 traders per 100,000 that you can actually A-book aka copy their trades. Also do you want to copy a trader 1:1 especially if they have a large account? No. You would have to be mentally disabled to do this. I would like to see your LP bridge, have access to your backend etc, only then I will take your word for it.
Arrash@0xarrash

the problem is prop firms have worked off burn and churn traders, believing that they can reduce pass rate then reduce pricing. Trader does well? cap them or deny payout. This whole model is broken. The only way to have trader trust is to be open-source so everyone can review everything, to have payments be onchain so it’s easily verifiable, and A-book your traders. No need for 3rd parties who can be paid off to show payouts. @VantaTrading

English
4
1
25
3.8K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@MTradingX Those going public are most likely the ones who are most scared of being found out so they are trying to create a mess and get their payout processed asap 🤡
English
0
0
2
51
Mat
Mat@MTradingX·
Just a quick one to all you people who are only waiting 4-5 business days for a payout, you do realise going public just makes the delays longer in nature? Speak to the firm directly and only once you exhausted all options, go public. If 7 business days pass, and you get stone walled then explore other options, try and use influencers and partners to help. You have no idea how many people I managed to help in private to get their payouts, refunds etc by speaking to the businesses in dms. Once you go public especially with with firms like the5ers etc, expect to get a ban as it is against their TOS (if you care to read it). Side note: Firms doing digs whilst living in glass houses are also pathetic, especially if its portrayed as 'sincere', its not, you're only posting for engagement farming.
English
4
0
32
1.7K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@MTradingX @ckcapitaluk_ What a fucking loser, still has the balls to trash talk FTMO while running scam courses, firms and services
English
0
0
1
50
Mat
Mat@MTradingX·
See wannabe fucking chump, the difference between me and you is that I could bury you within a few minutes I chose not to because I genuinely thought that maybe a few people will get paid from your scam @ckcapitaluk_ You are a degenerate, just like TJR and a few other jokers.
Mat tweet mediaMat tweet mediaMat tweet mediaMat tweet media
English
18
3
102
9.3K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@IncrlgzTrader Turkey is banned, how are you trading with them?
English
0
0
1
167
Çınar
Çınar@IncrlgzTrader·
Funded olduktan 70 gün sonra hesabı yolladılar. Bakalım payout’u kaç yıl sonra ödeyecekler. Bu hikaye bana bir yerden tanıdık geliyor. Haftaya payout’unu yollayacağım çınarımm kdkdkdkd
Çınar tweet media
Çınar@IncrlgzTrader

I got funded with $400K at @FundedElite 30 days ago, and for 30 days I haven’t received any response — positive or negative. If you’re not going to provide the funded account, couldn’t you at least review 4 trades in 30 days? I just told support in chat, “I got funded 30 days ago,” and they replied, “No, it was 29 days ago.” ;) Low-quality scammers. 🤡

Türkçe
8
1
71
9.8K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@harypips You are so fking cringe sharing everything written in confidential emails on socials, I really hope most prop firms ban you. There is a different between tracking your progress on firms and sharing everything written by public companies online 🤡
English
0
0
1
9
Harry Pips
Harry Pips@harypips·
Further Update: I was restricted to 1% risk per position because I changed Copytrading website from PropFirmOne to TradeCopyOnline. Though I took prior approval for using both of these website from their risk team. Strange that I received couple of payouts as well after that. I have responded to their email and looking forward to lift this restriction. In nutshell, I have not violated any of their rules.
Harry Pips tweet mediaHarry Pips tweet mediaHarry Pips tweet media
Harry Pips@harypips

As I was getting near to 10 payouts in number to be eligible for ALPHA PRIME, my excitement level was exponentionally increasing with @AlphaCapitalUK But today, it decreased to zero in impulsive wave as I have been restricted to 1% risk/trade after 7 payouts from the same account which is active for last 6 months stating that my trading style is gambling. I have also shared my history from last payout based on which they have restricted me. I have taken total 96 trades in 6 months with risk 1% and average reward 2%. My account never went below -4% in drawdown since start. I don't know why they restricted me. Honestly I have mixed feeling, happy for payout approved and sad for this strange restriction.

English
10
1
37
14.5K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@j_intradaytrade This is the reality of any company offering services to retail clients. If they see shady stuff they will lock you out of their services, nothing wrong with that 🤷‍♂️
English
1
0
1
171
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@SithHaters Are you really quoting a statement made by a guy who filed his claim himself with AI 🤣🤣🤣 The fuck are you even writing
English
0
0
1
416
SithTrader
SithTrader@SithHaters·
Forget everything else about this lawsuit... This one yellow highlighted line will forever change the landscape of the #propfirm industry. It was only a matter of time before we got a judicial claim that prop firms are "unlicensed commodity pool" I would go a step further, and outrigh call them "off exchange futures brokers" (equally as damning under US regulation). This will set a literally precedent for legal recourse against firms, as well as their status under the law as either roff sechange brokers or unlicensed commodity pools... Either designation by a court renders an entire industry in a regulatory quagmire, and the majority of firms will be left scrambling. Honestly, it's about damn time.
SithTrader tweet media
Jmu@jmutrades

🚨Breaking: Trader sues @Topstep in US District Court Complaint alleges Topstep "systematic and deceptive scheme to extract subscription fees, commissions, exchange fees, and trading data from futures traders while employing an ever-shifting set of rules, restrictions, and account structures specifically designed to prevent those traders from achieving sustainable profitability or accessing funds they have legitimately earned." "Defendants have repeatedly changed the rules of engagement-imposing increasingly restrictive trading parameters, prematurely forcing Plaintiff into "live" accounts with oppressive conditions; and locking earned capital in an inaccessible "reserve" requiring mathematically near-impossible returns to unlock." 🧵

English
19
5
60
20.6K
Salman Munir
Salman Munir@salmanmunir96·
Okay @revonetrading how exactly am I receiving promotional emails when I never signed up on your website or provided you with the email? Not what I expected and really killed any shred of interest I had.
English
13
0
41
5.4K
dima
dima@dimitry12121·
@hotaru_trader No, but those that are too profitable are obviously restricted after a while otherwise the company is stupid and doesn’t know how to run properly
English
1
0
1
47
hotaru prop_trader
hotaru prop_trader@hotaru_trader·
It pains me a great deal to have to say this about them. I say that because I traded with them for more than a year and a half, and I received over $65,000 in payouts. I also received more than $15,000 in payouts in just the first three months of this year. Their support was always very fast and polite, and every payout was processed within a few hours to half a day. However, they placed a restriction on me, limiting my maximum allocation to $25,000. (There were also restrictions related to news trading and a 1% risk limit, but those were rules I had already been following from the beginning.) I asked them for the reason. They told me that I had no violations and was not even under suspicion. That is in fact true, because I take full responsibility for my trading. The condition for removing the restriction is making $50,000 in profit. But the maximum drawdown on a $25,000 account is $2,500. That means I would need to make a 2000% profit. I was also terminated by FTMO, Blueberry, and The Trading Pit without sufficient explanation. Then, one week to one month later, I started seeing more complaints about those companies on social media. FundedNext may end up the same way. @Flynn3624 @FundedNext @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMedia @PropJournalist
hotaru prop_trader tweet media
English
20
1
56
8.6K