Sabitlenmiş Tweet
display
9K posts

display
@displaySverige
/ Ny media för en ny tid / Med sanna Journalister Följ oss Vi följer verkligheten
Sweden Katılım Ekim 2024
181 Takip Edilen202 Takipçiler

@jondelarroz woke cultural marxism reframed marxism to subvert affluent, stable societies by making culture the battlefield - everything is done to take you down . . .
!
English
display retweetledi

Melt. Extract. Fuel. Repeat. 🚀
To build an affordable, sustainable presence on the Moon, we must learn to live off the land. Air Pioneer is a scalable, modular system that creates purified oxygen to reduce dependency on supplies from Earth. Using Moon-extracted oxygen for propellant, fuel cells, and breathing reduces our lunar landers’ load by many metric tons of mass. Launching less mass from Earth lowers the cost of our Moon base, fueling a future cislunar economy. 🌕


English
display retweetledi

@jjjesti @PlanetOfMemes If u confuse ur self - no one will know ur next move - not even u 😅🫡
English


@PlanetOfMemes This truly is a superior strategy 🫡 We're in awe
English
display retweetledi

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s wife has been charged with influence peddling and private-sector corruption. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
English
display retweetledi

President Trump voices frustration with NATO, says Iranian navy ‘destroyed’ as US preps for blockade
foxnews.com/politics/trump…
English

The Moon Rocks. Moon Landing Denial Killers.
If you missed my previous post, we covered the Lunar Laser Ranging Retroreflector - the device Buzz Aldrin personally placed and aligned on the lunar surface on July 21, 1969, which independent observatories on multiple continents have been ranging ever since. MoLDs - moon landing deniers - had no credible answer for it. They will have no credible answer for this either.
Between Apollo 11 and Apollo 17, astronauts returned 382 kilograms of lunar soil and rock to Earth.
These were documented geologic samples collected from known lunar locations, photographed in place, cataloged, and distributed to laboratories worldwide - including in Cold War rival nations.
The material includes mare basalts, highland anorthosites, impact breccias formed in vacuum, glass spherules from micrometeorite bombardment, and solar wind particles implanted directly into surface grains. These samples show extremely low volatile and water content, no atmospheric oxidation, micrometeorite impact features consistent only with an airless environment, and cosmic ray exposure consistent with long surface residence.
Here is where it gets technically decisive.
Oxygen isotope ratios in the Apollo samples fall on the terrestrial fractionation line - confirming the shared Earth-Moon origin - yet they show distinct trace-element partitioning, siderophile depletion, and titanium isotope variations consistent with lunar differentiation and early magma ocean crystallization. These signatures were independently measured worldwide using high-precision mass spectrometry and are internally consistent across samples from multiple sites and multiple missions.
You cannot fake that. Not in 1969. Not now.
Now, MoLDs will raise their standard objections. Here they are, and here is why they fail.
OBJECTION 1: NASA faked the rocks using Earth materials or meteorites.
No terrestrial material matches the full suite of characteristics found in Apollo samples. The combination of vacuum-formed impact breccias, solar wind implantation, zero hydration, and the specific isotopic signatures described above cannot be replicated in any laboratory on Earth - then or now. As for the claim that NASA secretly gathered lunar meteorites found on Earth - Apollo samples established the scientific baseline that later allowed researchers to identify lunar meteorites in the first place. The rocks came first. The identification method came from them.
OBJECTION 2: The Soviet Union could have supplied the samples.
Before Apollo 11, there were zero successful lunar sample-return missions anywhere on Earth. The Soviet Union’s first was Luna 16 in 1970 - returning just 101 grams. Apollo 11 alone returned 21.5 kilograms. There was no prior sample-return capability. There was no hidden precursor. There was nothing to steal, borrow, or fake from.
OBJECTION 3: The stolen and fake rock cases prove NASA can’t be trusted.
MoLDs occasionally cite the petrified wood case in the Netherlands or the stolen goodwill rock from Honduras as evidence of NASA deception. These involved small diplomatic display plaques - decorative items, not scientific samples. They have nothing to do with NASA’s curated research collection or the Astronauts. The 382 kilograms of cataloged Apollo material remain secured, documented, and continuously studied to this day.
The samples match orbital spectroscopy. They match later robotic missions. They match Soviet sample returns. They were analyzed by independent laboratories across multiple nations, including nations that had every geopolitical reason to expose a fraud if one existed.
There was no prior sample-return capability.
There was no terrestrial substitute.
There was no hiding this from the world.
Independent tracking. Independent laboratories. Independent nations. Incontrovertible proof.
MoLDs have no credible answer for any of it. A dozen men walked on the moon. Soon, more will return and do even more.



English



















