Bryän

26.9K posts

Bryän banner
Bryän

Bryän

@ditigabelas

Opinion | Updates Macro dan Crypto | Web2 Marketer | Web3 Explorer | Indonesian

Katılım Aralık 2011
476 Takip Edilen491 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bryän
Bryän@ditigabelas·
Full of noise, stay focus! Hyperliquid
English
0
0
0
404
Bryän
Bryän@ditigabelas·
@gkisokay In your case manual switch LLM or auto switch LLM? My setup: $10 Qwen 3.5 plus daily task $20 Claude Sonnet 4.6 / Opus 4.6 for plan $20 Codex gpt 5.4 execution complex task
English
0
0
0
74
Graeme
Graeme@gkisokay·
My cheap Hermes + OpenClaw LLM setup that actually works: - Codex 5.4/mini ($20) as Hermes main brain - MiniMax M2.7 ($10) for daily execution - Opus 4.6 ($20) to plan and build new features from the desktop app Total: $50/month What’s your setup?
Graeme@gkisokay

The 'Super Self-Improving Multi-Agent Framework' for your Hermes or OpenClaw agent. The article below outlines how Hermes can watch over your Openclaw agent, so this example uses Hermes as the main agent. This idea is interchangeable based on preference. How it works: Agent 1 (Hermes) - The main agent: who operates your workflows, and who you have in the top hierarchy of agents. For simplicity, it also runs the workflows using its persistent memory and self-improving skills. Agent 2 (Hermes) - Main's Supervisor agent: who monitors the entire system, reading operations and failure logs, searches for bugs, solutions, then brings them to... Agent 3 (OpenClaw) - External Supervisor agent: who also monitors the Hermes system, and searches for issues and solutions. Multiple times per day, Agent 2 audits the system, finds errors, stale jobs, etc, proposes a fix, then tags Agent 3. Agent 3 audits the system, reads Agent 2's summary, and verifies the problem and solution. Together, they go back and forth in a dedicated channel until they find a coded solution to the problem. If it's a low-risk fix, it auto-fixes it. If it's high-risk, it's raised to Agent 1 for approval via the owner (me). The first goal is never to have to worry that the system is operating correctly. The second goal is to have two separate agents focused on recommending improvements to the system. Ideally, there are no bugs to fix, and you can have them focus on making meaningful improvements to your workflows over time. This is the basic workflow for monitoring, but you can extrapolate this framework to many more use cases. What's [redacted]? I'm cooking up something to continue working toward my goal of building more sentience in my agents. I will share more soon. Let me know in the comments if this works for you. I'll create a fleshed-out article if you are interested.

English
13
13
170
11.6K
Teknium (e/λ)
Teknium (e/λ)@Teknium·
FYI Qwen 3.6 Plus Preview is free on Nous Portal and OpenRouter in Hermes Agent right now :)
English
18
20
348
13.2K
Bryän
Bryän@ditigabelas·
@gkisokay Btw Any skill from clawhub can convert to hermes skill modul easily
English
0
0
0
85
Graeme
Graeme@gkisokay·
There are distinct advantages to using both OpenClaw and Hermes agent (see table 1). The #1 question I'm getting is "why don't you just use Hermes for everything?" The reason I don't is because I've been working on my research tool for 3+ months. In Claude Code, Codex, and eventually using OpenClaw. It works wonders for very cheap, and a Hermes rebuild would require a lot of time and credits. I'd be rebuilding what 3,500+ contributors and 5,400+ skills on ClawHub have already solved. So I asked myself, why not try to utilize both agents? Use their strengths to boost their weaknesses. OpenClaw is the fastest-growing open source project in history (339k GitHub stars). That community has built a massive tool-base. Plug in a skill, configure it, and it just runs. No code required. Hermes is fundamentally different. It's the only agent with a built-in learning loop. It creates skills from experience, improves them during use, and builds a deeper model of who you are across sessions. The way I see it, OpenClaw does the work, Hermes does the thinking and building. Together, we can build anything. Keep in mind, this is all very new and experimental. If anything, this is an important step in multi-agent frameworks working together. The possibilities only grow from here.
Graeme tweet media
Graeme@gkisokay

x.com/i/article/2037…

English
85
59
685
101.2K
Bryän
Bryän@ditigabelas·
POV After Switch Hermes from Openclaw
English
0
0
0
10
Bryän
Bryän@ditigabelas·
@gkisokay Why you not fully switch to hermes?
English
2
0
2
275
Bryän
Bryän@ditigabelas·
No Mac Mini, just old computer with Hermes Agent @NousResearch
Bryän tweet media
English
0
0
0
41
800.HL
800.HL@degennQuant·
Liquid banking app almost ready for takeoff
800.HL tweet media
English
26
6
200
6.3K
Bryän
Bryän@ditigabelas·
@satyaXBT Chatgpt 5.4 di codex bagus kok mendekati opus, jadi mungkin tier A
Indonesia
0
0
0
73
satyaxbt
satyaxbt@satyaXBT·
LLM AI tier list 2026: S: Claude A: Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok B: Kimi, Qwen, Perplexity C: MiniMax, ChatGPT D: Meta AI, Llama, Xiaomi MiMo kalian setuju nggak?
satyaxbt tweet media
Indonesia
115
68
1K
44.2K
Jay Scambler
Jay Scambler@JayScambler·
mfw I don't have to restart a gateway after every change in Hermes Agent. Makes it 100x more useable than OpenClaw
Jay Scambler tweet media
English
4
0
56
1.5K