Dmitriy Stepanov

1.3K posts

Dmitriy Stepanov banner
Dmitriy Stepanov

Dmitriy Stepanov

@dmitriystepanof

Crypto investor since 2017. Degen, drophunter, sybil, abuser 😁

Россия Katılım Kasım 2018
1.1K Takip Edilen908 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dmitriy Stepanov
Dmitriy Stepanov@dmitriystepanof·
Earn 30% of all fees from direct referrals, and 10% of fees for all indirect referrals: polymarket.com/?r=stepanov Earnings are calculated in real-time as your referrals trade. Payouts are deposited directly into your Polymarket balance, where you can trade with them or withdraw.
English
0
0
1
91
Dmitriy Stepanov retweetledi
Ryan McConnell - COO of DeAura
@Polymarket you gotta fix this man, he said all these words and the proof is there. The UMA voting system is clearly broken
Ryan McConnell - COO of DeAura tweet media
English
0
1
8
54
Dmitriy Stepanov
Dmitriy Stepanov@dmitriystepanof·
🚨 MEGA-FRAUD & MARKET MANIPULATION ON POLYMARKET / UMA ORACLE: MILLIONS STOLEN FROM RETAIL TRADERS! A massive, coordinated execution is happening right now on @Polymarket and @UMAprotocol.
English
8
15
219
394
Dmitriy Stepanov retweetledi
kaulboy
kaulboy@kaulboy·
@shayne_coplan @Polymarket your oracle just resolved the trump-xi iran/nuclear market NO trump's exact quote: "we did discuss iran. we don't want them to have a nuclear weapon" - WH pool note #5, filed 11:55 AM Beijing (Danny Kemp, AFP, on-camera real time) - TVB Hong Kong yt metadata: was_live, timestamp 11:56:11 AM Beijing - every major broadcaster ran LIVE chyrons - kalshi resolved the same market correctly UMA voted NO because the pavilion was "closed press." brother the broadcast happened. on live tv. it's on youtube right now with was_live attached to it. and this is not the first time we're doing this: - ukraine mineral deal: $7M market, resolved YES with no deal signed, one wallet swung it with ~5M UMA - zelensky suit: $160M+ market, every outlet AND POLYMARKET'S OWN ACCOUNT called it a suit, resolved NO, ~$25M staked by whales to make it happen - now this: $31M currently, the most active market on your platform, flipped by a low-turnout governance vote UMA's market cap is smaller than the volume of a single disputed market on your venue. top 10 wallets control >50% of voting power in disputes. ~95% of supply held by large holders. you are running a $9B platform on top of an oracle a handful of retards can rug for eight figures you already override baseball payouts when umpires fuck up. add a human/AI last resort layer for high volume markets with primary source evidence. it's not philosophically harder than what you're already doing kalshi is eating your volume every week because of exactly this. traders don't want to gamble on whether a UMA whale woke up short. fix it or watch the centralized competitor win the entire prediction market category ngmi
English
37
38
80
21.4K
Dmitriy Stepanov retweetledi
Eternity
Eternity@ParetoPrincipl·
$25,000,000 involved in financial fraud on Polymarket! We need your attention on this matter. The game is rigged by UMA Rocks whales, and regular traders got scammed. Chronology: First, at the summit, Trump says "Iran", "Strait", and "Nuclear". The market instantly reacts, and YES skyrockets to 99.5%—fully aligned with logic and truth. Period. Then, something strange happens. Some bad actors start spreading the idea that this was not a LIVE stream but a pre-recorded video broadcast, thus leading to a resolution of NO. This is possible, okay, but only after a scrutiny examination of all possible sources of translation, which requires a large amount of work and analytics. Obviously, not all evidence had been gathered at the point in time before the clarification. Then, the Polymarket team issues a clarification stating that this was not a LIVE stream, but that is NOT TRUE - no proper examination has been done! From this moment on, the scam starts spreading, and the market flips to NO, costing 99%. UMA Rocks provides no self-correction to this situation and only blindly copies the Polymarket team's clarification (which is definitely WRONG)! Our Answer: At the moment the Polymarket team issued the clarification, not all evidence had been gathered, making it a completely unprofessional move leading to catastrophic FINANCIAL FRAUD. Furthermore, UMA Rocks only facilitates the error, not providing any meaningful discussion, and aligns with the Polymarket team's clarification (which is WRONG). WE ASK FOR AN IMMEDIATE RE-EVALUATION OF THE INCORRECT CLARIFICATION THAT LED TO FRAUD INVOLVING 25,000,000 DOLLARS
English
60
74
243
248.6K
Dmitriy Stepanov retweetledi
Forte Protocol
Forte Protocol@ForteProtocol·
1/ We’re building a perpetual protocol around a simple idea: outcomes should come from market direction and position management, not from hard-to-model exchange mechanics.
English
501
15.8K
18K
203.1K