dmscoon
13.4K posts


@pwilsondtf how so? if inmates gets credit for killing them in prison, surely the government would get some credit for each one since they put the pedophiles in prison with their wouldbe murderers
English

@DelbridgeMark1 @mickitiki famously... it and ruby ridge radicalised thousands of americans
it directly caused the Oklahoma city bombing
English

@Truth_matters20 1. who says that cant happen?
2. we know for a fact that life is made of non-living stuff, the hydrogen in our bodies is the same that powers the sun
3. "order" is subjective, complexity is guaranteed by entropy
4. we regularly make rocks think by injecting them with lightning...
English

@NThompson_3 @Rothmus as i said, they're a type of government thats lacks the power and the monopoly over violence that "the state" has
do you think they should be allowed, or not?
im not asking whether you would join one, im asking if you think people should be allowed to if they wish
English

@NThompson_3 @Rothmus we're talking about political theory... semantics actually matter here
please read carefully, i said "ruler" meaning a person who is given power over others, not "rule" meaning the concept of law
English

@NThompson_3 @Rothmus incorrect, you're describing the "state of nature" and it would immediately fail as soon as two or more people agree to work together...
do you think that people should be able to form things like voluntary HOAs? because thats a type of government thats lack the power of a state
English

@NThompson_3 @Rothmus and no, the word anarchy means "without a ruler" not "without authority"
anarchists want authority over their own lives
English

@YisraelOfficial no one is saying that jews arent indigenous to israel, rather that most israelis arent the type of jews who are
but to answer the question
the bible tells us that god lead the jews to israel and told them to exterminate the existing population
palestinians are their descendants
English

@NThompson_3 @Rothmus again, one scale is who has control, the other is how much control they have
and in theory yeah, they're completely opposed, but i dont think that either type of anarchy could actually work and that right-anarchy would inevitably lead to totalitarianism and techno-feudalism
English

@ADF_11F_C1_Dux @PrussianBert @Rothmus you should look into "Civil asset forfeiture"
no conviction nor compensation required
English

@dmscoon @PrussianBert @Rothmus No, it's not the same, an average democracy would not only do it when it's ABSOLUTELY neccesary, but would also compensate you for taking it (Most of the time w money for a % of the property value)
During nazism not only it happened frequently, but also there was no compensation.
English

@NThompson_3 @Rothmus its a spectrum based on the context, a groups of elites was better than one person
and no, right-anarchists want absolute power over themselves (and usually their families), they're just delusional enough to think society could actually function if everyone acted like that
English

@cafehead @JumpOutRetard @grok @EvanLuthra @elonmusk ahh, the classic signs you're winning an argument, going after my spelling
English

@dmscoon @JumpOutRetard @grok @EvanLuthra @elonmusk And doesn't have an education system, apparently. *Country's... Yw.
English























