Kyle😊

3.7K posts

Kyle😊 banner
Kyle😊

Kyle😊

@dochomey

pain doc, sax,flute, clarinet😊Mooney driver, Leadville rider

Central california Katılım Ağustos 2012
668 Takip Edilen129 Takipçiler
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson You’re wrong. They were mandating this vaccine when it only had EUA approval. The full approval came much later. If you’re this far off about this thing….does that mean you’re totally wrong about everything else. .?
English
2
0
12
153
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Ah yes, the Nuremberg Code—dragged in like a stage prop whenever the argument can’t stand on its own. Kelly Victory is making a grave accusation, but it dissolves on contact with reality. The COVID mRNA vaccines were not “experimental” in the conspiratorial sense. They went through large trials and were authorized, then approved, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. That is not a secret. That is the standard process. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did not violate the Nuremberg Code. That code addresses forced human experimentation without consent. School and workplace vaccine requirements are longstanding public health policy, not war crimes. “Knew the risks” is not a revelation. Of course they did. Every intervention has risks. The question is whether benefits outweigh them. By 2022, the answer was already clear in reduced hospitalizations and deaths. And when Drew Pinsky amplifies this, it is less a contribution to medicine and more the familiar clickbait reflex—turn complexity into outrage and call it insight. If everything is Nuremberg, then nothing is.
Dr. Drew@drdrew

"These were not mistakes my government made. These were lies my government told me," says @DrKellyVictory, as the Senate reveals evidence the CDC knew of mRNA's risks by 2022, but continued to coerce students into taking experimental shots — in "violation of the Nuremberg Code."

English
56
38
128
12K
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson i think Aaron Siri has more data to back up his claims than you do. not even close.
English
0
0
0
1
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
I could do a longer post on this but suffice to say , the familiar trick: take a sliver of immunology and inflate it into a grand conspiracy. Yes, the pertussis vaccine does not perfectly block colonization. No, that does not mean the vaccinated are the ones spreading it. Transmission is not a philosophical concept. It is who gets infected more, who coughs more, and who sheds more bacteria. The unvaccinated win on all three counts. If the claim were true, vaccination would worsen outbreaks. Instead, it reduced deaths dramatically, especially in infants who cannot afford your “natural immunity” experiment. So this is not brave dissent. It is the confident confusion of mechanism with reality. This is also a lawyer who thinks he can use rhetoric to substitute for clinical expertise. He has never sat in a pediatric ICU or neonatal ICU with a child who is in heart failure because some aunti didn't get her vaccination and passed it on. This is why you don't listen to him or RFK Jr when it comes to medicine.
Aaron Siri@AaronSiriSG

Who is more likely to spread the pertussis bacterium (aka, whooping cough)—those vaccinated or those unvaccinated? The reality (see FDA, industry, and pharma scientists sources below) is that it is the vaccinated. Why? Two reasons. First, those vaccinated are less likely to have symptoms if infected with the pertussis bacterium but the bacterium still multiplies in their nasopharynx and they then unknowingly spreading it to others (instead of showing symptoms and knowing to isolate). Not science fiction—the hard cold facts as detailed below. Second, and this makes the reality even worse, because after an unvaccinated person has been infected with pertussis (and is more likely to have symptoms and stay in bed) that person won’t get infected again for at least many years – but the vaccinated individual can become infected over, and over, and over again with the pertussis bacterium because of the defective immunity this vaccine generates. But don’t worry, legacy media, no doubt won’t let the facts stand in the way of their hyperbolic reporting. They will blindly, like religious adherents, seek to blame, persecute, and shame those who do not inject this product instead of facing the reality: those vaccinated are more likely to spread this pathogen. If you don’t agree with the foregoing, take it up with the FDA, industry scientists, infectious diseases societies, and the hard cold data and science: - As the FDA explained in 2024: “aP [acellular pertussis] containing vaccines induce helper T cells (TH2) memory and neutralizing antibody responses that effectively prevent symptomatic disease but fail to prevent colonization and carriage.” fda.gov/media/181937/d… - As those considered the world's leading pertussis vaccine experts, pharma consultants, and infectious disease societies explained in a consensus paper on pertussis vaccine in 2019: “Natural infection evokes both mucosal and systemic immune responses, while aPVs [acellular pertussis vaccines] induce only a systemic immune response. … Mucosal immunity is essential to prevent colonization and transmission of B. pertussis organisms. Consequently, preventive measures such as aPVs that do not induce a valid mucosal response can prevent disease but cannot avoid infection and transmission. … aPV pertussis vaccines do not prevent colonization. Consequently, they do not reduce the circulation of B. pertussis and do not exert any herd immunity effect.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31333640/ They also explained that: “Lack of mucosal immune responses after aPV administration favor infection, persistent colonization, and transmission of the pathogen.” - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29180031/ (“That vaccination does not prevent B. pertussis infection in humans, nor the circulation of the organism in human populations in any important manner, comes from the observation that the inter-epidemic intervals have not changed in a major way since the implementation of mass vaccination.”); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30793754/ (“Because of linked-epitope suppression, all children who were primed by DTaP vaccines will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes, and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility.”). For a detailed discussion with many more citations and irrefutable evidence, see Chapter 9 of Vaccines, Amen.

English
17
17
78
3.7K
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson appeal to authority by claiming you’re an MD has been totally debunked now. An MD isn’t much different than any other vo-tech certification.
English
0
0
0
272
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Don't assume you know more than a doctor because you heard we took four days of nutrition class. Remember, medical students take anatomy, physioloby, and GI physiology at a graduate level more than you take. They will be taking out the cancers, they will be treating the cancers - to start out saying you know more because you think you understand medical school curriculum is an overly confident place.
🩺 Jude RN 🩺@Rockenjud

Got in trouble again for telling a patient with cancer to cut down on sugars, carbs, junk food, eat healthy, organic food. I was told I'm a nurse not a nutritionist or dietician. Ok Felicia but in my nursing program I took more the 4 days of nutrition classes then medical students take. That alone makes me more qualified then a doctors nutrition advice

English
31
26
592
53.6K
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@MohammedAlo When you were on the Paul Saladino podcast I was surprised you had no ability to discern the truth. You obviously haven’t changed at all…… or you just get paid to spread BS.
English
0
0
2
47
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@MurseDarius @bfacedplague @JeromeAdamsMD It doesn’t matter what he says. It’s all BS. No one has done a cost benefit analysis of any vaccine and probably never will. Vaccines are just another religion to these people.
English
0
0
3
8
Darius Sharpe
Darius Sharpe@MurseDarius·
The article says "costs" not "state budget," which is what was stated in the post. So is "state budget" a comparison, or is he saying that amount of taxpayer money was spent? Some expenditures are surely Medicaid, some are private insurance, but how these "costs" itemized? An average hospital stay is $15,000. So that would be $300,000 for 20 stays for measles. The other cases are just supportive care at home (rest and fluids), and maybe a doctor visit. So tell me where $35 million is spent? I say this as someone who is generally supportive of kids getting vaccinated. But I don't like when people make the argument by throwing out wildly inaccurate statistics.
Carmichael, CA 🇺🇸 English
4
0
6
221
Jerome Adams
Jerome Adams@JeromeAdamsMD·
A measles outbreak in South Carolina (993 cases, 20 hospitalizations, 5 months) cost an estimated $35.5M- about 6.7% of the state public health budget! Vaccinating the same group? Just $66K–$134K. Every $1 spent on vaccines could’ve saved $536. Prevention isn’t just smarter- it’s dramatically cheaper. Put another way, more measles outbreaks means higher taxes - for everyone. 🤷🏽‍♂️ americanactionforum.org/weekly-checkup…
English
168
1.6K
3.3K
184.3K
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson You probably also believe vaccines are safe and effective. Obviously you can’t read the literature that might show problems. This is just another religion.
English
0
0
1
14
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@MohammedAlo Are you sure the data you rely on doesn’t come from statin manufacturers. They wouldn’t have ANY conflict of interests, would they ?
English
0
0
0
41
Dr Alo, DO, FACC
Dr Alo, DO, FACC@MohammedAlo·
You realize he's not a cardiologist and relies on studies from the 1970s? We have 50 more years of data that he cours6es to ignore. Tabas & Williams published 3 papers to disprove an his claims starting in 1995. You keep finding the worst grifters to follow. Maybe in a few years you'll discover Paul Saladino, Gary Brecka, Dr Boz, Ken Berry, Sean Baker, Ovadia, and others. Maybe ChatGpt can help you pull up their old posts from 2015 to help you grift faster.
Dr. Ammous@AmmousMD

Summary of the actual truth about cholesterol by .@malcolmken: 1️⃣ Dietary fat does not affect blood cholesterol. 2️⃣ Even if it did, it wouldn’t matter much. 3️⃣ High cholesterol doesn’t cause heart disease. 4️⃣ Statins don’t protect by lowering cholesterol (if they help), it’s through other mechanisms. 5️⃣ The benefit of statins is tiny and massively exaggerated. 6️⃣ Side effects are more common and serious than admitted. 7️⃣ Many “experts” promoting them are funded by the companies making them.

English
10
3
28
2.3K
Michael Albert, MD
Michael Albert, MD@MichaelAlbertMD·
I'm 36. I'm a physician. I take a statin—and ezetimibe—every day. No symptoms. No cardiac history. Just an honest read of the evidence. Here's what I found—and why I stopped waiting for a reason to act.
English
506
211
2K
2.2M
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson Wrong! Where did you got to med school. What’s that thing, the hypocritical oath? Didn’t you have to take that one too?
English
0
0
0
3
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
If you demand zero harm before acting in public health, you are not raising the ethical bar. You are abolishing action altogether. And in medicine, as in life, inaction is not neutral—it is simply harm by neglect wearing a clean white coat.
Dr. Drew@drdrew

Accurate. But everyone needs to be aware that public health does not have the same ethical standard as practicing physicians to DO NO HARM. In fact, many are not even clinicians and have such mandate.

English
3
1
7
393
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson Apparently it doesn’t matter what we tell you. You’re impervious to the truth. So you’ll just keep spewing BS all day anyway.
English
0
0
0
11
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@SeeFisch yes, but it’s true🤷🏻‍♂️
English
0
0
2
92
Conrad Fischer
Conrad Fischer@SeeFisch·
I find it utterly repulsive that conspiracy-theory hacks throw out statements that Pediatricians are giving vaccines to profit off children. Or that NIH scientists are covering up ADHD or autism or Alzheimer's cures. Revolting nonsense to take the most generous people and turn them into villains. Wrong!
English
2
5
35
3.2K
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson That’s funny. I don’t recall those classes from my med school, and I’m pretty sure I graduated many years after you did. Most of those vaccines didn’t even exist then. So you’re obviously just gaslighting some more.
English
0
0
0
3
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
I do love how people who have never gone to medical school are curriculum experts - yes we do study vaccines, immunology, virology, microbiology and yes we are the clinical experts who see disease.
Scott Pitkeathly@PitkeathlyScott

@drterrysimpson You’re are one of them Terry

English
74
190
1.8K
50.5K
Simon Maechling
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling·
MAHA is the Dunning-Kruger movement. People who understand the least speaking with the most certainty about science, medicine, and public health.
English
60
108
732
16.2K
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@JeromeAdamsMD @NoToAllGMOs What happens if the vaccines are dangerous. Who will take responsibility then? Certainly not you or your ilk. I just wish you guy would try telling the truth just once.
English
0
0
1
10
Jerome Adams
Jerome Adams@JeromeAdamsMD·
Which has in fact always been the case. But in the Bible and in life, choices come with consequences. You can choose not to get vaccinated, but that doesn’t mean you have the right to harm other people in public places (eg schools). As the saying goes, you’re right to swing your fist ends at the tip of my nose. 👊🏾 👃🏽
English
3
0
20
273
Jerome Adams
Jerome Adams@JeromeAdamsMD·
Never had 'Catholic Church stronger on vaccines than Surgeon General nominee' on my 2026 bingo card. Pontifical Academy for Life: Catholic parents should vaccinate kids 'for the good of their children and the community.’ cathstan.org/us-world/amid-…
English
31
383
1.5K
24.1K
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson The data doesn’t care what you think. Explain the results from Paul Thomas’s and the Henry Ford Hospital papers. They seem to indicate that safety and efficacy aren’t really a slam dunk. And, if that’s the case, it’s most likely that the standard research papers are corrupted.
English
0
0
0
46
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
No matter how carefully you explain the data to anti-vaccine activists, the result is always the same. If you show randomized trials, they say the trials were rigged. If you show population data, they say the numbers were faked. If you explain rates vs raw counts, they ignore the denominator. It isn’t a debate about evidence. It’s a belief system that only accepts information confirming the conclusion they started with.
English
138
143
738
18.2K
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@NightShiftMD You’re an idiot. Why don’t you engage with facts. Vaccines are dangerous. If you think the benefits exceed the risks (they probably don’t ) then show us why.
English
0
0
0
25
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@IanCopeland5 Nope. All vaccines are toxic. Good thing that the studies are coming to light that show this.
English
0
0
0
8
Kyle😊
Kyle😊@dochomey·
@drterrysimpson My hospital was almost empty, and they wouldn’t let me do elective cases. It was total BS
English
0
0
0
19
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Sorry - you may think it is a lie, but it is not and administrators cannot empty a hospital, that is a doctor who can discharge a patient. And since I was there, and you were not- you are just a conspiracy nut spreading nonsense
English
110
40
283
79.2K