Don_p

65 posts

Don_p

Don_p

@don__ps

Katılım Haziran 2012
2.9K Takip Edilen56 Takipçiler
Don_p
Don_p@don__ps·
@brl11 Great post - TY
English
1
0
2
345
Bryan Lawrence
Bryan Lawrence@brl11·
Nvidia is the world’s most valuable company, generating $120 billion of annualized net income selling highly engineered chips and software that have required decades to perfect. So why have they felt it necessary to issue a rebuttal to short sellers like Michael Burry? Three reasons: 1. It is difficult to sustain 75% gross margins when some of your biggest customers are unprofitable, and your chips are 80% of their costs. 2. Those unprofitable customers are dependent on investors to fund their losses. Investors can move in herds, and their confidence about AI has been made fragile by OpenAI’s "manifestly ridiculous" $1.4 trillion of compute commitments. 3. More broadly, Nvidia is unsure where value will land in the AI business. Anyone using the latest models knows how they can lower the cost of legal advice or reading an MRI. Our own work finds that reading an MRI costs $150 for a human doctor compared to $0.15 for an AI model. This 99.9% spread is the biggest we have ever seen in business. But who gets it? The chip maker? The model maker? An application maker? The doctor? The patient? Nvidia’s real competitor is Google, which generates $140 billion of annualized net income and owns important assets across the full stack of AI: TPU chips; Gemini models; data from 3.5 billion humans using its services; and distribution across multiple surfaces like Search, YouTube and Cloud. Nvidia’s strategy is to support its customers’ efforts to raise investor capital until their businesses capture enough of that 99.9% spread to be self-sustaining, and to hope that its own 75% gross margins are sustainable. A loss of investor confidence impairs this strategy, which why the rebuttal was issued. Google’s strategy is to drive costs down across the full stack, to protect Search's advertising business and to generate profits wherever they end up landing. Its founders have said they are willing to bankrupt the company rather than lose in AI. Investors chasing winner-take-all outcomes across the AI stack may be disappointed. Based on how unit economics look today, much of AI looks like a commodity business in which low cost wins. Nvidia’s and Google’s strategies are in obvious conflict. Some investors will make a lot of money and others will lose a lot. More will be revealed as this unfolds. Pass the popcorn.
English
60
122
746
259.7K
Don_p
Don_p@don__ps·
$NVDA Looking at that H100 price chart, I see we're in a terrible supply crunch. Prices absolutely skyrocketing to... $1.97.
Don_p tweet media
English
0
0
1
47
Nozz
Nozz@NoahEpstein_·
Just sold my digital hitman for $7K + 20% of every dollar it prints forever. Basically armed robbery with a laptop, but when you see this thing convert cold leads into meetings, you'll call me a saint. What this AI assassin does: - Stalks prospects across the entire internet - Finds emails on websites - Crafts messages so personal they think you're psychic - Closes deals while you're asleep / at a strip club / or both My client's about to print millions and I'm just gonna act like I didn't just finesse the deal of the century. Hope he never finds this tweet. Follow + RT + Comment "hitman" and I'll send you the link to my free Skool community where you can download the files, cheat sheets, and watch sales bros everywhere panic.
Nozz tweet media
English
491
298
782
98.1K
Don_p
Don_p@don__ps·
@theblockupdates Which one is compromised, Gensler or SEC account?🤡
English
0
0
0
119
The Block Pro Headlines
The Block Pro Headlines@theblockupdates·
*GENSLER SAYS SEC 'TWITTER ACCOUNT WAS COMPROMISED, AND AN UNAUTHORIZED TWEET WAS POSTED' - THE BLOCK PRO
English
3
4
34
4.9K
SEC Chair Gary Gensler Archive
SEC Chair Gary Gensler Archive@GenslerArchive·
The @SECGov twitter account was compromised, and an unauthorized tweet was posted. The SEC has not approved the listing and trading of spot bitcoin exchange-traded products.
English
26.3K
9.6K
28K
30.9M
Jens Christiansen
Jens Christiansen@jenshigh·
Surprised to see how unstable Solar is performing in Germany This is from a 153 MW solar farm The production is very unsmooth, I guess because of drifting clouds? This increasing costs for consumers, not the owners @EnerginetDK sheds light on the matter: energinet.dk/om-nyheder/nyh…
Jens Christiansen tweet media
English
19
6
60
7.9K
Ryan Scott (Horse)
Ryan Scott (Horse)@TheFlowHorse·
Oh wow Tesla CyberTruck beat a Porsche? Cool, I'll still take the Porsche. You can take back your truck that looks like it was the result of a Kindergarten drawing competition.
English
85
7
497
57.6K
Don_p
Don_p@don__ps·
@gurgavin Agree. Also, someone go check on $PYPL hodlers
English
3
0
0
435
GURGAVIN
GURGAVIN@gurgavin·
S&P 500 CLOSED AT A NEW YEARLY HIGH TODAY SOMEONE GO CHECK ON THE PEOPLE CALLING FOR A 80% CRASH THIS YEAR $SPX
GURGAVIN tweet media
English
133
164
1.8K
212.3K
Aporia
Aporia@0xaporia·
"proprietary data" USM2+(ECONOMICS:CNM2/USDCNY)+(ECONOMICS:JPM2/USDJPY)+(ECONOMICS:EUM2/USDEUR)
Aporia tweet mediaAporia tweet media
Raoul Pal@RaoulGMI

@PeterAngel2019 No, its proprietary data

Indonesia
16
46
408
69K
friend.tech
friend.tech@friendtech·
Get an invite code from a friend and try the app at friend.tech on any phone
English
10.8K
808
3K
1.7M
Don_p
Don_p@don__ps·
@realXRPwhale Asking for a friend, what is happening below 0.56$?
English
0
0
0
139
Don_p
Don_p@don__ps·
@gurgavin Yes, please. I don’t see a single reason to buy PYPL
English
0
0
0
42
GURGAVIN
GURGAVIN@gurgavin·
SHOULD I DO A THREAD ON WHY I LIKE PAYPAL SO MUCH AT THESE CURRENT PRICES $PYPL ??
GEOFF WOO@geoffreywoo

@gurgavin Why so much conviction on Paypal? What's a quick summary on your thesis?

English
344
34
1.8K
355.9K
Assad Tannous
Assad Tannous@AsennaWealth·
Open a $TSLA chart on TradingView and see what happens. Hopefully this is a one off. Lol
English
5
0
8
19.9K
Assad Tannous
Assad Tannous@AsennaWealth·
As you're coming out of a stage 1 base on indicies the underlying instruments that have already broken out of their bases and are creating higher bases (already trending) tend to be where the explosive moves come from on the next breaks because money will be concentrated on stocks making 52week highs (relative strength). They're consolidating above the 200d in a weak tape.
Assad Tannous tweet media
English
6
2
60
12.3K