acc
17 posts


@YiranShi199155 @AnyaForger0_O @duanhjlt 你个傻逼,看命都来了。
那还看鸡毛网课,刷鸡毛题
考试的时候全蒙不就完了么,反正都是选择题,你说的看命么,努力有什么用🤣🤣🤣
中文
acc retweetledi

The biggest point that AI pundits are missing regarding the AI arms race isn't just that Google's latest (Gemini 3) AI model is as good or better than ChatGPT...it's that it's totally FREE. And therefore it destroys the OpenAI circular business model.
gizmodo.com/marc-benioff-j…
"Despite its excessive spending on data centers with no clear path to revenue generation in front of it, it seemed that if OpenAI had just one thing it could count on, it was audience capture"
“Holy shit. I’ve used ChatGPT every day for 3 years. Just spent 2 hours on Gemini 3. I’m not going back.”
How can OpenAI possibly pay for its massive hosting commitments when they are up against a search monopoly providing the exact same service for free?

English

@Alex8282019 如果中共國的導彈能打下飛機,那也一定是用的偷來的美國技術。任何情況都不可以低估中共的無恥,中共作惡的能力如何高估都不過分。
中文
acc retweetledi

Q2 was the worst quarter of the 2022 bear market. This bear market is proceeding much faster. If losses remain proportional and the market rolls over at this level, then the next leg down would be ~40%. And total loss from the top would be -50% by the end of this quarter. Which would essentially erase the entire AI rally.
However, I expect this to be a non-linear event as the break of support (blue line) will trigger system crash. So who knows how bad it could get.

English

@unusual_whales The rest of the world knows that China is the problem, not the US.
English

Based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the World’s Markets, I am hereby raising the Tariff charged to China by the United States of America to 125%, effective immediately. At some point, hopefully in the near future, China will realize that the days of ripping off the U.S.A., and other Countries, is no longer sustainable or acceptable. Conversely, and based on the fact that more than 75 Countries have called Representatives of the United States, including the Departments of Commerce, Treasury, and the USTR, to negotiate a solution to the subjects being discussed relative to Trade, Trade Barriers, Tariffs, Currency Manipulation, and Non Monetary Tariffs, and that these Countries have not, at my strong suggestion, retaliated in any way, shape, or form against the United States, I have authorized a 90 day PAUSE, and a substantially lowered Reciprocal Tariff during this period, of 10%, also effective immediately. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Donald Trump Truth Social 04/09/25 01:19 PM
English
acc retweetledi

公平,公平,还是他妈的公平(聊聊迫在眉睫的4/2关税政策落地日,川普这帮人到底在想什么?到底想干嘛?最后可能会如何落地?)
昨天川普政府的白宫经济顾问委员会主席斯蒂芬・米兰(Stephen Miran, chief economic advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump)在Bloomberg上接受了采访。
(reference:youtube.com/watch?v=6LnQa0…)
采访上声明了两点核心内容:
1. 川普想要的是“平等、互惠的关税政策”(fair and reciprocal tariffs)
2. 美国是全球最大的消费市场,所以在贸易谈判中美国占据优势和强势地位,美国有逼迫对手降低关税的优势和筹码
美国在二战后作为全球老大,确实对各个国家的税收比例都比较低,老美是典型的现代海洋文明思路:通过工业文明和社会制度优势,在公平贸易的框架下,进行利益攫取和扩张
但是后边陆续很多国家为了发展自己国家的工业体系,开始增加贸易壁垒,加高对美国出口来的商品的关税。但美国没有及时的管理和应对,所以其实这么多年来,老美确实是处于类似被“薅羊毛”的状态。
我举个例子:比如美国的汽车出口到某国会被收20%的关税,但是某国的汽车出口到美国只会被收5%的关税,这样确实是老美被持续的薅羊毛了。
看到这里,大家心里应该就懂了甚至是和老美共情了。
所以我理解关税、贸易战最底层的逻辑是两点:
1. 表面上:大家要公平贸易,各位不要再薅羊毛了,公平、公平还是他妈的公平!
2. 实际上:老美的国力确实不如从前,从大手大脚宽宏大量到斤斤计较过紧日子。债务高企,内政外交都碰到了很多问题。原来让小弟们薅薅羊毛也无所谓,但现在地主家也没余粮了,准备战略收缩精打细算过紧日子了
那后续关税、贸易战会如何发展呢?我估计有两种大方向:
1. 如果在川普的恐吓威胁下,其他国家确实降低了对美国的关税,那美国就真赢了,美股会向上
2. 如果在川普的恐吓威胁下,其他国家硬碰硬,川普只能被迫也加高关税,那至少短期上是双输局面,美股会向下
我倾向于短期内可能是第二种情况会更多,但长期看美国会把不平等的关税打下来。
当然,我内向也希望能打下来,不然从历史上看最后只会出现作为一个风险资产投资者最不想看到的局面:
"如果商品跨不过过境,那最后跨过国境的可能就是军靴了"
PEACE AND LOVE🙏

YouTube



中文

@Mayday117 @TrumpDailyPosts American companies can just go to other suppliers. They don't need Chinese suppliers. There's many suppliers in other countries like Taiwan, Indonesia, India, etc. This is a no-win situation for China.
English

Yesterday, China issued Retaliatory Tariffs of 34%, on top of their already record setting Tariffs, Non-Monetary Tariffs, Illegal Subsidization of companies, and massive long term Currency Manipulation, despite my warning that any country that Retaliates against the U.S. by issuing additional Tariffs, above and beyond their already existing long term Tariff abuse of our Nation, will be immediately met with new and substantially higher Tariffs, over and above those initially set. Therefore, if China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long term trading abuses by tomorrow, April 8th, 2025, the United States will impose ADDITIONAL Tariffs on China of 50%, effective April 9th. Additionally, all talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated! Negotiations with other countries, which have also requested meetings, will begin taking place immediately. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Donald Trump Truth Social 04/07/25 11:14 AM
English
acc retweetledi

在vivi这个帖子基础上,谈谈凌晨的FOMC会议:
1、Fed当前面临的难题
1)外部风险:滞涨风险与政治不确定性风险,此外还有金融机构的流动性紧缩带来的危机
2)数据风险:数据滞后(关税冲击和供应链变化不会实时显现)
3)内部分歧:尽管整体偏鸽,但鹰和鸽分歧较大
因此,在上述约束条件下,联储和鲍威尔的决策逻辑和立场有一些变化
2、联储的决策逻辑
战略、战术两个层面上,分别进行了一些优化。
战略上,利率继续保持观望模式,同时拒绝给出清晰的降息承诺,传递决策的数据依赖。
战术上,做个三个调整:
1)强调纽约联储5y的预期稳定,防止市场对通胀预期脱锚,同时淡化并抛弃密歇根指数。本质上,美联储是选择了有利于引导预期的数据。
2)强调关税的一次性通胀的剧本,重提“暂时性通胀”为降息作铺垫。这样的目的有三:
⭐️强调暂时性,给FOMC回旋余地以此弥合点阵图的分歧
⭐️ 淡化SEP给出滞涨信号,换言之,这是在暗示,下调GDP,上调cpi不是长期滞涨,Fed仍会在通胀下行时降息。
⭐️ 对冲关税带来预期脱锚风险,因此他明确强调如果经济增长放缓,关税相关的通胀可能会被部分抵消。换句话说,即便关税上行,美联储也不会因为这个不降息。
1和2主要是防止市场对关税引发的通胀有过度反应,以至于市场预期脱锚。
3)调整缩表节奏,战术性的对冲因为债务上限等问题导致的流动性冲击。尤其是鲍威尔提到市场指标继续表明储备质量充足,但已有收紧加剧迹象。这句话的直接意思就是:这次QT的调整是战术性的应对市场环境的变化。
上述三点,清晰的给出的联储的核心目标:应对特朗普政策的冲击、确保金融稳定、对冲滞涨风险。
以此整个策略倾向于格林斯潘式的温和紧缩+控制通胀。接受一定程度的经济放缓,同时防止市场过度定价降息(点阵图),根本上目的是不让市场的预期失控。
或者更通俗的讲:用战术让步换取战略空间,短暂的平息市场焦虑。
3、对市场的影响是什么
1)很显然这个鸽中带鹰的申明依然延续了鲍威尔式的预期管理风格,但偏向上毫无疑问是鸽的。毕竟不仅没有更激进的鹰派信号,同时在流动性上做了一定的让步。
2)债券市场的收益率尽管同步下行,但短端下行斜率更大,曲线趋陡,换句话说市场认为市场认为短期降息概率上升,但长期通胀风险仍存。
3)支撑短期市场,但是长期路径仍需要根据数据和市场博弈演进决定,重大的变量是4月的对等关税。
vivienna.btc@viviennaBTC
【当前市场的交易基准与变盘的节点】 3.19美联储维持基准利率不变,基本符合市场预期。 议息决议中的要点包括: 调高通胀预期;降低GDP增速预期;缩减QT规模——于4月1日开始放缓资产负债表缩减步伐。将美债减持上限从250亿美元/月放缓至50亿美元/月,MBS减持上限维持在350亿美元/月。 鲍威尔的新闻发布会发言透露出多种不确定性信号,主要是担忧关税对通胀的影响,认为关税带来的通胀是暂时的(P.S. COVID-19后、加息之前他也是这么说的)。对通胀的担忧和维持点阵图降息预期不变说明美联储仍对“滞胀”风险保持谨慎态度。 所以点阵图对于今年降息的预期没有发生变化,大约为2.6次。但从市场反应来看,似乎更多的押注未来的降息幅度会大于点阵图预期。直接反应是美股和美债市场同时上涨,也反映出市场对于“滞胀”风险已经price in。 缩表节奏放缓对债市也是利好。但市场基本已经price in这一点。分结构来观察的话,收益率曲线继续陡峭。长债本应受益于缩表节奏放缓(供应减少),但从收益率表现来看,短债下行更大,一个原因是市场对短期未来经济增长的预期较为悲观,投资者倾向于购买短期债券,推动其价格上涨,收益率下降,另一个原因可能是市场仍预期通胀上行,使得长债收益率下行受阻。 因此,当前的市场基础是:降息两次,有可能6月降息一次,下半年再选择机会降息一次。在这一交易预期基础之上,任何经济、通胀、劳动力市场数据的变化,都可能让降息预期提前、或者力度更大。比如通胀超预期下行,或者是经济超预期上行。 通胀如果超预期下行,那么交易通胀上行的美债收益率有可能回归(即利好美债)。而经济超预期回升,则交易衰退的美股市场将进行修正(即利好相关美股)。
中文





















