dormantdev

2.1K posts

dormantdev banner
dormantdev

dormantdev

@dormantdev

jobfree jack-of-all-trades, into security, cloud, AI and anything in between.

Katılım Haziran 2025
238 Takip Edilen100 Takipçiler
dormantdev
dormantdev@dormantdev·
@RAin_Meusel Welch ein Zufall, gestern erst mit Effi Briest angefangen.
dormantdev tweet mediadormantdev tweet media
Deutsch
1
0
2
39
Christiane Meusel
Christiane Meusel@RAin_Meusel·
Wer die heutige Zeit verstehen will, muss Fontanes Stechlin sehen. Und das tue ich gerade 🥳
Deutsch
5
4
26
1.2K
Wojciech Pawelczyk
Wojciech Pawelczyk@WojPawelczyk·
Communism kills people and inventions. Polish engineer and inventor Jacek Karpiński could have made Poland an IT powerhouse, but his potential was never fully realized due to the communist system he lived under. In 1970s Poland, Karpiński made an incredible technological breakthrough: the K-202. It was a computer capable of a million operations per second, yet small enough to fit into a briefcase. At a time when computers were not only slower but also the size of large cupboards, this was a remarkable accomplishment. When Karpiński debuted the K-202 at the Poznań International Fair in 1971, it drew significantly more attention than its main Polish competitor, the slow and bulky Odra. The press was ecstatic; the weekly Perspektywy wrote: "A micro-computer based on fourth-generation electronic components was made; it is the most universal machine of its kind in the world. It operates at a speed of a million operations per second, a result matched only by the American Super Nova and the English Modular One." Unfortunately, the communist regime blocked the device from mass production. Karpiński's goal was a versatile micro-computer not limited to scientific use, a device that would have been at the forefront of global development. While the Institute of Experimental Physics lacked the funds, the army also ultimately declined the project. Their decision was based on a committee's finding that the project was impossible to realize because... if it were possible, the Americans would have already done it.
Wojciech Pawelczyk tweet media
English
9
59
299
8.5K
dormantdev
dormantdev@dormantdev·
@AnonSyri @CzaPaw @Ziggydank If this post wasn't "specific" enough for you on who's doing the nuclear fearmongering, you are not informed enough to comment on this topic. x.com/dormantdev/sta…
dormantdev@dormantdev

@AnonSyri @CzaPaw @Ziggydank I find it highly naive to believe that for example a country that in year five of the war still hasn't sent Taurus because "nuclear escalation" and "historic responsibility" would bomb Russian territory. For Narva or Daugavpils.

English
1
0
0
18
Very Annoyed
Very Annoyed@AnonSyri·
@dormantdev @CzaPaw @Ziggydank You literally brought up nuclear escalation and the fearmongering around them by an unspecified “them” (the people who do that are those in power). We won’t have any nuclear war. The threats are for deterrence.
English
1
0
0
14
dormantdev
dormantdev@dormantdev·
@AnonSyri @CzaPaw @Ziggydank Which of course will never happen without key alleys like the US, Germany and France joining, which they won't, hence "wishful thinking". Scholz is not chancellor anymore, his successor explicitly campaigned on sending Taurus, and guess who still hasn't got Taurus.
dormantdev tweet mediadormantdev tweet media
English
1
0
0
21
Very Annoyed
Very Annoyed@AnonSyri·
@dormantdev @CzaPaw @Ziggydank I didn’t just say bombing. We border Russia. Should they invade the Baltics, we should invade, annex Królewiec, and once/if they are repelled from the Baltics then move north to occupy St Petersburg and cut the Russians off from the Baltic Sea.
English
2
0
0
24
Very Annoyed
Very Annoyed@AnonSyri·
@dormantdev @CzaPaw @Ziggydank None of them are committed to fire an atomic weapon should Russia carry out an invasion. Nuclear weapons are a last resort due to the threat of mutual annihilation. Since nobody wants to be obliterated in nuclear hellfire, they won’t actually press the button.
English
1
0
0
16
dormantdev
dormantdev@dormantdev·
@AnonSyri @CzaPaw @Ziggydank Whether or not NATO members bombing Russian territory to defend the Baltics is "wishful thinking", we will find out when the day has come. Which, again, I hope we never see.
dormantdev tweet media
English
1
0
0
24
Very Annoyed
Very Annoyed@AnonSyri·
@dormantdev @CzaPaw @Ziggydank I see, you’re using a VPN to appear in America. This isn’t wishful thinking. I’m saying they are ours to protect because they’re just as much of a victim of the partitions as we were, and the Russians are never again to annex them.
English
1
0
0
21
dormantdev
dormantdev@dormantdev·
@AnonSyri @CzaPaw @Ziggydank You're arguing with the wrong person. It's not me who's been scaring the population about a "nuclear escalation". If you want to address me, you'd have to convince me why in case of a Russian invasion of a Baltic country, those decisionmakers would radically change their minds.
English
1
0
0
18
Very Annoyed
Very Annoyed@AnonSyri·
@dormantdev @CzaPaw @Ziggydank There isn’t going to be a nuclear war. If Russia invades, nobody will press that button. It’ll be a conventional world war like the last two had been.
English
1
0
1
21
dormantdev
dormantdev@dormantdev·
@AnonSyri @CzaPaw @Ziggydank I'm not American and nothing about my profile indicates so. But yes, I am convinced it would not happen. And that nobody is helped by such unrealistic wishful thinking. Not that any of us would get to make the decision.
English
1
0
0
19
Very Annoyed
Very Annoyed@AnonSyri·
@dormantdev @CzaPaw @Ziggydank I’m saying that we (Poland) should, and that you (America) have an obligation to do so as well. Nobody knows the future so you aren’t saying that this (intervention) won’t happen, but rather that you believe that it won’t. I’m saying that we absolutely should intervene.
English
2
0
0
29
dormantdev
dormantdev@dormantdev·
@AnonSyri @CzaPaw @Ziggydank I find it highly naive to believe that for example a country that in year five of the war still hasn't sent Taurus because "nuclear escalation" and "historic responsibility" would bomb Russian territory. For Narva or Daugavpils.
English
1
0
0
60
Very Annoyed
Very Annoyed@AnonSyri·
@dormantdev @CzaPaw @Ziggydank We should. I support our intervention should the Russians invade. Not only are they fellow NATO states so we (AND YOU!) have an obligation to defend them, but they are also *our* kin. We shared the Commonwealth with the Lithuanians and Latvians. Their home was once our home too
English
2
0
5
80
dormantdev
dormantdev@dormantdev·
@CzaPaw @Ziggydank Poland will not attack a nuclear power to defend the Baltics, outside of the attacked country's territory. Neither will any other NATO state, in particular not France, the US or Germany.
English
1
0
7
179
Paw_Cza🇵🇱
Paw_Cza🇵🇱@CzaPaw·
@Ziggydank IF this happens, I hope Poland will act as it ahould be (Destroying Kaliningrad to the last military asset).
English
1
0
34
1K
Adam Blackhall
Adam Blackhall@AdamBlackhall·
@OrdinaryInds @wackie Sheesh. Is that where we're at now. Artificially slow load times to give the impression the AI is "thinking" 🤦‍♂️
English
3
0
28
1.7K
Ellie Huxtable
Ellie Huxtable@ellie_huxtable·
spot the error from a younger, dumber me
Ellie Huxtable tweet media
English
184
15
1.4K
1M
Institut für Realitätsabgleich
@eerdappel @dormantdev @glr_berlin Mit Argumenten auf diesem Niveau kriegen wir das AfD-Problem nicht in den Griff. Jeder Demokrat wird Ihnen sagen, dass eine Partei die nicht verboten ist Wahlplakate aufhängen darf und sich Ihnen entgegen stellen. Versuchen Sie es doch mal mit solchen Argumenten hier ...
Institut für Realitätsabgleich tweet media
Deutsch
1
0
0
13
julius geiler
julius geiler@glr_berlin·
Der mit Abstand dümmste Account mit den mit Abstand dümmsten Followern auf dieser dummen Dumm-App
julius geiler tweet media
Deutsch
646
176
5.4K
142.9K