@[email protected]&BlueSky

I plan to delete my account soon. I am now dr2chase at ohai.social, you should look for me there, and you should also migrate there yourself.

Anyone who follows me who is still here, Bluesky & Mastodon are both fine alternatives. Here's a Mastodon (ohai.social) invite: ohai.social/invite/TjdQth6u Just in case you did not know, Musk is making Nazi salutes, & then editing them out here: mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…

I encourage all the other rats to abandon this stinking ship and use some other social media. If Mastodon is not for you, perhaps Bluesky; it picked up a lot of people earlier this month (for some reason), if you looked earlier and thought "nah", look again.

Some of you may be considering sitting this election out, or voting for a third-party candidate, because you strongly disagree with Kamala Harris about Gaza. This thread is for you 🧵

Do it, America.

i think this is legitimately what’s happening to voters as Election Day inches closer and closer

@DrawsMiguel that check comes from state variables in the function containing the loop, so the iterator cannot block it. I recall (maybe correctly) that the Bad Iterator panic was regarded as "not the loop body" and thus does not trigger the swallowed-panic panic. Performance also matters.

@DrawsMiguel the inner loop panic is basically "if the loop body panics, then a panic must appear in the function containing the loop". It's not picky about panic identity, but the non-intuitive "this code should have panicked but I cannot see it" is not allowed to happen. /

@DrawsMiguel Given that you had to defer-recover to stop it from panicking at you, I think the answer is obvious. Parallel for loops won't work and are explicitly not supposed to work.

@DrawsMiguel does the race detector hate on this?

@DrawsMiguel I think also if we promoted the iterator misuse panic into a "loop body panic", thus inflicting it on anyone using the iterator, that it your little trick would work less well. And/or the return path could check the state variable, and *it* would throw().

@DrawsMiguel you may also get a WAI response. Or we could change that parallel-execution panic into a throw(), that'll fix it.

It occurred to me that there are actually young men who might be voting for Trump. I have one simple question for them: Do you like sex with women? Because one way to get less of that, is to make it harder for women to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Also, paternity tests, a thing.

Disgraced QB involved in Mississippi's largest public embezzlement scheme to join convicted felon and adulterer in final pitch for fascist American future.

Looks like an immigrant worked illegally, tsk, tsk. Can we deport him? washingtonpost.com/business/2024/…

@NC_FYB @NCDemParty @SteveTroxlerNC Bless your lil heart. You may want to get your prescription checked on your glasses we want you to see the ratio since you didn't see the grape leafs...

@NC_FYB @NCDemParty @SteveTroxlerNC Those are muscadine grapes. Are you that dumb?