SimplicityFx

@t0mbfx So you can profit off of the affiliates.

If you’re a profitable trader, you shouldn’t be spending months on one funded challenge If you are, you’re probably under-leveraging Risk 2% per trade, and either pass it fast, or fail it fast Worst comes to worst you fail the challenge and have to buy another one - risk 2% per trade again and try to pass it in decent time This is much better than having the same funded account for months, or even a year and risking 0.5% per trade trying to escape from drawdown Fair enough if you’re not profitable yet But if you ARE, then you lose much more in opportunity cost by staying on these challenges forever than you do in actual cost by failing 1 or 2

@imantradingYT Check out Lance Breitstein a sophisticated Conman that's on the Market Wizards book. Happy to share some infos.

one of the more pathetic things someone can get caught doing — glazing themselves from an alt account but forgetting to actually SWITCH to the alt. Reminds me of how ICT got banned on Babypips for sockpuppeting (alt accounts). Clown world.

@rotrade93 Funded accounts are not worth anymore, Too much Bs rules and Even the Top firms are banning consistent traders and not paying them.

A 50K funded account is all you need to start changing your life. Do the reps and you'll be rewarded !

@sherman_trades @t0mbfx Golf every day hahaha

@t0mbfx Dudes making $10k a trade are not going to do $20 jobs - they go golfing

Profitable trading is boring I know guys who make 6 figures a year from trading who go back to working part-time just to fill their day Dudes will literally make $10k in a trade then go an work a $20/hour job for a few hours 😂 That’s why I started my Discord lol - before that I would just trade for 1-2 hours a day then just be bored for the rest of it At least now I can talk to my members and help people with their trading

@baynkr If you’re a writer, you’re expected to actually write your own work. The Text feels like it was generated cheaply by AI just comes off unnatural and doesn’t really make sense.

No system will make you profitable. Trading can be taught as a way of thinking, but not as a fixed rule set that transfers cleanly from one person to another. The setup is only the trigger. The real decision is state → action → size → review. Patterns get your attention. Policy makes the decision.

@TheDisruptorX @joker_szn After having an edge, You need Consistency Not Disicpline. Disicpline will eventually blow up, it's not the solution.

@joker_szn This is a real conversation worth having. But it works both ways. An edge without discipline still gets destroyed. Discipline without an edge just means you lose slowly and consistently instead of chaotically. You need both. The question is which one you are actually missing.

most of you suck because you've got no edge not because you lack discipline because being disciplined is easy when having an actual edge

@TraderSumo1 Enough talking.

It should be painfully obvious to you all by now: Funded prop firms do not actually want profitable traders. They eval ban you. Constantly tighten rules. Push you out of their ecosystem. Now they are taxing you to come back. It's crazy that I'm building the only prop firm with a model that actually wants to find good traders. These firms are making it too easy for me. You're never getting banned for being too profitable.

@TheTobyAce Dumb take,They are probably right, you're not trading well lol. In fact they would like to keep you if you trade well bcz consistent traders will land them consistent commissions.

Always thought broker bans were a myth. Until the email landed today Trade too well, and suddenly you're the problem.

@fundedtraderx23 @propwarzx @wannabechamp @FTMO_com Maybe I tend to run away from people who bring religion or God into business conversations. Your beliefs are your own, and I respect that but I’m here for high-quality, professional service. Otherwise, it’s a major red flag for me.

@draftplus77 @propwarzx @wannabechamp @FTMO_com Maybe by becoming Muslim he can attract more muslim to take his courses.

Champ, you say today you’re back at max allocation with FTMO @wannabechamp However, in your video here you say you’re banned by @FTMO_com When you scan the QR code it says your last live account was in Nov 2025 Dan, you’re better at trolling than me 😈

@simo_vanov High Impact News is nothing but a catalyst, It's just more volatile PA, If your PA read is correct, 90% of the time it will follow through, The remaining times it could be influenced by uncontrollable events such as black swan.

Yesterday my system closed a EURUSD long 30 minutes before the US PPI print. All five confluence factors had confirmed. Higher-timeframe structure was bullish across all timeframes. The key level interaction was clean. Session context was aligned. Momentum was in the trade's favor. The USD weakness thesis, which had been the foundation of the setup, remained intact. The trade had been running since the London open and it was up on the session. And the AI closed it. The reasoning was straightforward: PPI at 15:30 is a binary event. Holding through it means accepting a coin-flip on a news spike against a position that's already delivered. Banking the profit and waiting for the post-data structure to settle is the cleaner play. Re-entering with fresh context after the print is a better setup than gambling on which direction 30 seconds of volatility resolves. This is one of the things that took me a while to build into the system correctly. The intuition when a trade is working is to let it run. But letting it run through a scheduled macro event isn't confidence, it's just exposure. There's a difference between holding through normal price fluctuation within a defined structure and holding through a data release that can print 40 pips in either direction before you can react. The system exited at 1.17959. PPI came out soft. EURUSD continued higher afterward. Exiting early left something on the table in this case. The process was right regardless. Outcome and process aren't the same thing, and conflating them is how you end up holding through the next data release when it doesn't go your way.

@jackschwager So buy High, Sell Low?

Stock Market Wizards Quotes (2/117) The hardest thing to do is to buy a high-flying stock or to sell a stock that has gone down a lot, but I always find that the hardest thing to do is the right thing to do. Stuart Walton bit.ly/4mkVwmg

@simo_vanov Love your posts man, keep them coming.

My 30-day win rate is 38%. 21 trades, 8 wins, 13 losses. Here's what that number actually means. --- The win rate isn't the problem. The asymmetry is. My average winner over the period was 22.79 EUR. Average loser was 56.50 EUR. When your average loss is 2.5x your average win, a 38% win rate produces negative expectancy. That's what the data shows. Not that the setups were wrong, but that exits and loss management produced unfavorable R-ratios across a specific period. --- The concentrated source of that asymmetry: two setup types that underperformed in March and early April. Counter-trend index shorts during a strong risk recovery phase. Counter-trend EURUSD entries in a week where the pair was building clear bullish structure above key daily levels. Both directional call errors, not execution errors. The entries were placed where the playbooks indicated. The playbooks were reflecting the wrong bias for the prevailing macro environment. --- This is what the systematic review is for. You don't override the system during a losing streak. You collect enough trades to identify whether underperformance is variance or a signal. When the pattern is clear enough, you update the playbooks. That update ran after the March run. April 7, 9, and 10 came back positive. --- 38% over 30 days is a real number from a real account. I post it because trading publicly means showing the full picture. The transparency isn't about the result. It's about having the actual data to work with when something needs to change.

@TraderSumo1 Best of luck.

@draftplus77 What if: Rules were CME rules? No extra fluff. Payout risk was removed completely. No evaluation banning. Unlimited amount of concurrent evaluations accounts? And more... Would that change anything?

After 15 years of trading my personal accounts, I've been watching the prop firm industry. I successfully and briefly traded with a few prop firms and took somewhere around 500K in payouts. I was ultimately evaluation banned. The industry is massively misaligned against their trader customers. All the large firms operate in a predatory manner, profiting solely off a large portion of their customer base's failure. This is ponzi territory. At best, they operate with an insurance company model. After many months of studying the industry, my partners and I have formulated a way to innovate and operate a firm morally and ethically, with the customer's best interest in mind. Yesterday, we closed our first investment round. Many of you that know me well, know that I'm coming. If legal let's me build this, the ponzi firm models are in trouble. Follow for more to come.

This whole anonymous trader act is cringe. They think they’re somebody special, but there are literally countless millionaires out there and nobody gives a damn. The hate and jealousy are mostly just an illusion. No one cares.

@t0mbfx This whole anonymous trader act is cringe. They think they’re somebody special, but there are literally countless millionaires out there and nobody gives a damn. The hate and jealousy are mostly just an illusion. No one cares.

Most people from my area still don’t know I do trading My family and close friends do But if anyone else asks I say I’m still a bricklayer as I used to do bricklaying with my dad before trading I’m mostly anonymous on this account too People don’t need to know you do trading - all you’ll do is invite jealousy into your life

@kenoski69 Hindsight 🖕

$GBPUSD Turtle Entry was missed by 2 pips 😴💔

@Purusho89829236 @chariq2p3829 @ScarfaceTrades_ Lance didn't make shit, There is no public verified proof.

@chariq2p3829 @ScarfaceTrades_ You can't be sure about it. LanceBreistein is still doing mentorship even after having made $100 million in verified profits.

$35,000 this month. It took me 3 years to learn how to trade. 3 years of losses made back in 2 days.

@I_Am_The_ICT Someone who has failed to prove his legitimacy shouldn't be advising others.

How much effort are you prepared to put in? Some have already considered quitting without ample time and energy spent on this craft. When some tap out, give up or whine it is complicated; I don't pity them. That is a testimony to laziness. If you don't believe it is for you, I agree.